In short
Consular notice for a foreign detainee is entered from that line if the request was written on the minute. If the line is empty, the request is not read from the minute. The consulate does not take the place of the Turkish court. A period is not frozen in this text. Flight and concealing the notice line are not narrated.
The request is written on the minute
The request for notice is a separate line on the detention or statement minute. The line should show from whom the request came and which state's consulate is mentioned. If there is no state name, the notice is not completed with a representation that is guessed. The country in the nationality box is not written as the consulate's name while the line is empty. If it is written that there is no request, the absence is read. A sentence said later, that the person had asked, does not take the place of the empty line.
The request does not show of itself that the notice went. The request is the place where the person's wish passed onto paper. The going is read from a notification document if there is one separately. If the two records are mixed, a notice that was not asked for is read as having gone, or a notice that went is read as if it had never been asked for. The mix is not removed by copying one line from the other.
The detention decision and the notice line can stand side by side on the same paper. Standing side by side does not make the notice the reason of the decision. The decision is the own text of the detention. The notice is the notification note beside that text. The note does not change the result of the decision. Foreign nationality passing in the reasons does not make the notice line count as full. The reasons are the ground of the detention. The notice line is whether notification was asked for.
The notification document is separate from the minute line
The notification document is a separate paper showing that the notice was conveyed to an office. A date, the addressee representation, and the unit that conveyed it are looked for on it. If one of these three is missing, the document is not read as a completed record of going. The missing piece is not produced from the request sentence on the minute. The request sentence shows the wish. The document shows the conveyance.
If the document conflicts with the minute, the conflict is not erased. If the minute says the person did not ask, the not-asking is read. If the document still carries a conveyance date, the date stays on the document's own line. This page does not rule by rote on whether the conveyance was lawful. A ruling is not built before the two papers are read side by side. While only one paper is in hand, the other is not completed as if it were there.
The name of the representation is left in the form in which it is written on the document. The representation of a nearby country is not put in its place if it is not written. If the person holds more than one nationality, which representation is mentioned is limited to the name on the line. If the second nationality is not on the line, a second notice is not treated as existing. If the state in the passport differs from the state on the line, the difference is not closed. Each document carries its own state name.
The consulate does not take the place of the court
The consulate does not lift the detention decision and does not set up a judgment in place of the court. An acquittal is not promised from this correspondence either. The official's meeting is not a copy of a meeting with defence counsel. Defence counsel is the name of assistance in the defence. The interpreter is the language of the statement. Consular notice is a line separate from these two boxes. The three are not pasted in place of one another. The translation box is not treated as filled because the official knows the same language. Being in the room does not set up a sentence that defence counsel was present either.
Information the consulate conveyed may show that it reached the person's own country authority. This information does not change an interim decision of the Turkish court. If a letter enters the file, it is read as a letter. The letter is not put in place of the detention decision. A request in the letter is not cut out and pasted as the court's reasons. A request is a request. The decision is the decision text.
If there is a meeting minute, the date of the meeting and who was present are read from that minute. If there is no minute, the meeting is not treated as having happened. The content of the meeting is not built from a summary told by relatives. The summary does not take the place of the line in the file. Even if a defence request passes in the content, the request is not written of itself in place of a petition in the criminal file. A petition requires its own document record.
Administrative detention is not criminal detention
Administrative detention in a removal centre is not criminal detention. The paper of administrative detention is not put in place of the detention decision. A removal act is a separate administrative decision too. If the decision has been served, an objection to a removal decision is read from its own text. This page writes neither the period of administrative detention nor the period of detention. If the period is in the own sentence of the decision in hand, it is taken from there. If there is no sentence, a number is not added.
Which record the person is held in is read from the heading on the institution document. If the heading says detention, the notice line is looked at in that record. If the heading says administrative detention, the writing is read under its own name. The two headings are not joined by rote. Being in the same building does not turn the two records into one record. The name of the building does not change the type of the decision.
A residence card and a work permit are not the document of the detention notice. A residence permit not being extended and a refusal of a work permit are in their own services. These notices do not show that notice went to the consulate. The card being valid does not fill the notice line either. The card having ended does not set up the existence or the absence of the request.
A period is not frozen in this text
If the date on which the notice was entered is written on the minute or on the notification document, it is read from there. If it is not written, this page does not set a day count. A formula such as immediately or within a short time does not take the place of the day either. An article number is not written. A period is not invented from a circular that is not in hand. If the circular is not in the file, a ruling is not built as if the circular were there.
If there is no notification document, it is not completed as if the notice had gone. A release ruling is not built as if it had not gone either. The result of detention is on the court's own paper. A result is not said while that paper does not stand. The gap between the dates is not turned into an announcement of a breach in this text. The gap is seen. Seeing it does not write the result of itself.
If there is a second minute in which the request was repeated, the second date is on its own paper too. The first date does not erase the second. The second date does not make the first count as never having happened. Two requests are two lines. Which document is tied to which is read from the reference on the document. If there is no reference, a tie is not built from closeness.
The notice line is not a release decision
The notice line being full does not mean detention has ended. Its being empty is not treated, on its own, as having lifted the detention. Whether detention continues is read from the court's detention text. This page does not write a result in place of that text. If there is a release decision, it is read from its own date and number line. While there is no decision, the notice line is not put in place of release.
Flight, concealing the notice line, or having a wrong state name given to the consulate is not narrated. The subject is whether the request was entered on the minute. How a wrong state name would be caused to be written is not in this text either. The name that is written is whatever is on the paper. If a correction stands in a later minute, it is read from that minute. If it does not stand, a correction is not invented.
The frame of criminal detention is on the criminal law page. The foreigner's administrative record stands apart from the international law page. If the line is in hand, the reading is made from that line through contact. While there is no line, the notice is not completed from nationality.
If there is an interim decision on the continuation of the detention decision, the notice line is looked for separately in that interim decision. If the interim decision does not touch the notice, the earlier request line is not treated as erased. If it touches it, the sentence it touches is read. If the sentence is not a release clause, release is not treated as having been made. If the clause is separate, the clause carries its own result. Even if the result and the notice note stand in the same paragraph, one does not become the ruling of the other.
A letter a relative wrote to the consulate is not the person's request line. If the letter entered the file, it stands as a letter. If it is written on the minute that the person did not ask, the not-asking is read. The relative's letter does not lift this not-asking of itself. If the lifting stands on the person's own later line, it is read from there. If it does not stand, the letter is not put in place of the request.
If there is more than one state name on the notice line, the names stand. Which document went to which representation is read from the addressee on the notification paper. If the addressee is one, the other name is not treated as a notice that went. If the addressee is not written, this page does not choose a representation. Choosing would be a way of having a wrong state name written. That path is not here.
Conclusion
Consular notice is entered from that line if the request was written on the minute. The notification document is a separate conveyance record and does not take the place of the request sentence. The consulate does not take the place of the court and does not write a release decision. If there is no document, it is not completed as if the notice had gone. A period is not frozen. Administrative detention is not a copy of criminal detention. The detention record is in the frame of Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271. An administrative act concerning a foreigner is read apart from the text of Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection.