Private international law · Legal information

How Is a Refusal to Extend a Residence Permit Read?

Author · Av. Ayşenur Konar, Avukat

Published ·

In short

A refusal to extend a residence permit is notice that the request to extend was not accepted. The notice is not a removal decision. The period is written in the service. A day count is not frozen here. The reading starts with the ground of the writing that was served and with the date on it. The end date on the permit document is placed side by side with this writing.

What the refusal notice says

The ground is in the writing that was served. While there is no writing, the reason for refusal is not treated as completed. A file belonging to a foreigner is built from the text of the notice, not from the district where the office sits. An oral explanation does not take the place of the service. If the application form and the refusal writing do not say the same thing, the refusal is read from the text that was served, not from the form. An incomplete photocopy is not treated as having completed the ground.

A refusal to extend also has the notice read as to which date the permit will end. If a date is not written, this text does not invent a date. The end date on the permit document and the refusal writing are placed side by side. If the two dates conflict, the one written in the service is taken as the basis. The old end date on the document does not give rise to a new period while there is no refusal writing. The period is looked for on the notice.

Is a removal decision the same writing?

Removal is a separate administrative act, and it looks to its own service. A refusal-to-extend writing does not take the place of a removal decision. Even if the two acts come in the same envelope, each is read from its own text. The envelope being one does not join the acts. The elements looked for in a removal decision do not stick, of their own accord, to the ground of the refusal to extend. Which paper is which act is separated from the heading.

Service of a refusal to extend does not write a plan of removal from the country either. The reader sees the ground of refusal and looks at the period. If there is no removal writing, the result of that writing is not built from here. If there is one, its own day of service and its own ground are read. The days of the two services are not copied onto each other from memory. In each period, the day on that envelope is the basis.

Are a work-permit refusal and a citizenship refusal separate?

A work-permit refusal and a citizenship refusal are separate notices as well. The period of one is not pasted onto the other from memory. A writing refusing to extend residence does not, of its own accord, say the end of the work permit or the result of the citizenship application. Each application carries its own decision. If there are three writings in the file, there are three acts. One can be an acceptance and the other a refusal. A mixed folder does not turn the acts into a single refusal.

Whom the service was made on is also read from the text. A notice made not on the foreigner but on the representative is seen from the representative line. The date of service is placed side by side with the record on the envelope and the receipt note of the writing. If there is no date, a day count is not invented. Which day the period for an action will start from is read from the service record in hand. This text does not freeze that day.

The service record is the basis of the period

The service record shows whom the writing reached, and on which day. If there is no record, the day is not produced from a guess on the envelope. Service made on the representative is read from the representative line. A service made on the foreigner is not built separately from the day the representative saw the file. If there are two records, each is tied to its own writing. The refusal-to-extend record is not pasted in place of the removal record. Which envelope belongs to which act is separated from the heading.

If the end date on the permit document also appears in the refusal writing, the two dates are left side by side. If the refusal writing carries no date, the end date on the document is not used to invent a new period. If the period is written in the service, it is read from there. If it is not written, this text does not set a day count. The day on a work-permit or citizenship writing is not copied onto this service from memory either. Each application carries its own decision and its own day of service.

Which service is looked at

A refusal-to-extend writing is not the same act as a removal decision. An Ankara lawyer separates from the file that the office being in Çankaya does not change the ground of refusal or the period. The district of the office address does not take the place of the notice. The period and the ground are read from the service. The frame that separates a refusal to extend from a work-permit refusal and from a refusal of a citizenship application sits on the international law page.

Conclusion

A refusal to extend is read from the service. The period is on the notice, and it is not frozen here. Removal is a separate act. Work-permit and citizenship refusals are also read from their own writings. The basis is the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458.

Legislation

Frequently asked questions

Within how many days is an action brought against a refusal to extend?

A day count is not frozen here. The period is on the service of the refusal to extend. The day of service is entered in the file.

Is a residence that was not extended a removal decision?

No. A refusal to extend notifies that the request to extend was not accepted. Removal is a separate act, and it is read from its own service.

Is the file read according to the district of the office?

No. A file belonging to a foreigner is built from the text of the notice. The district where the office sits does not take the place of the ground of refusal.

Related reading

This article sits under one practice area. The neighbouring guides carry the detail that does not belong in this text.

Practice areas · Private international law

Sources

AK

Author

Av. Ayşenur Konar

Lawyer on the Ankara Bar Association roll, founder of Konar Hukuk. This text is general information; a specific file is reviewed separately. Author profile · Editorial policy

A consultation

We can look at the matter with you. The path depends on the documents. This is not a promise about the result.

Call