In short
Cancellation of a residence permit is not expiry of the period, or a refusal to extend. The state of the card is read from the ground in the cancellation writing. The end date on the card does not answer this writing on its own. The plastic card standing in hand does not remove the operative sentence in the cancellation text. A petition objecting to removal is not built on this page. The cause of cancellation is not guessed while there is no copy of the decision.
The card standing in hand does not erase the provision
The residence card is the document produced when the permit was given. A start and an end can appear on it. Cancellation is a separate administrative writing that brings the permit to an end without waiting for this interval to close of its own accord. The person may be carrying the card in a wallet. Carrying it does not remove the operative sentence of the writing. The provision is read from the cancellation text, not from the face of the card. The date on the face and the date in the writing are left side by side.
The print date shows when the card was produced. The date relating to cancellation is on the writing’s own line. The print date does not take the place of the ground of cancellation. The explanation on the back of the card does not build a new sentence of ending while there is no cancellation writing. If the explanation is mentioned in the cancellation writing, the sentence that is mentioned is taken as the basis. If it is not mentioned, the explanation is not made the cause of cancellation. A card whose photograph was renewed does not change the same distinction either. A new printing does not leave the old cancellation writing without effect of its own accord. Lack of effect is read only if it stands expressly in a later writing.
That the card was notified as lost does not take the place of the cancellation writing either. If there is a loss notice, it is read from its own record. If the cancellation writing refers to this notice, the reference is as far as it was written. If there is no reference, the two records stay separate. The card being physically at the administration is not treated as having completed the ground of cancellation. The ground is still in the paragraph of the writing.
The kind line of the card shows under which name the permit was given. If the cancellation writing mentions this name, the kind that is mentioned is read. If it does not mention it, the kind line does not build the cause of cancellation. A short-term, family, or student expression can be standing on the card. The expression does not take the place of the ground in the cancellation text. Cancellation is not a step that changes the name of the kind. If there is a separate writing that the kind changed, that writing is read from its own sentence. If there is no writing, the kind on the card does not produce a new permit as if it had not been cancelled. If there are two copies, one with the person and one with the attorney, the sentences are compared. If the sentences are the same, what is read is that sentence. If the sentences differ, the copy that has a service record is taken as the basis. If both have a record, the two texts are left side by side. The difference is not closed on this page by choosing one sentence. A missing copy is not treated as having shortened, of its own accord, the paragraph on the full copy.
Expiry of the period and cancellation are separate endings
The expiry of the interval written on the permit document is not a ground of cancellation. If the period has expired and there is no cancellation writing, the end is looked for on the card and on the permit’s own document. If there is a cancellation writing, the question of the end turns to that writing. The old date on the card does not produce a new validity as if there had been no cancellation. If a cancellation writing arrived while the interval had not yet expired, what is read is the cancellation text, not the remaining part of the interval. Calculating the remaining part from the card and treating the cancellation as absent would be erasing the writing.
A non-extension is not cancellation either. A non-extension notifies that the extension request was not accepted, and it sits in the article on a residence permit not being extended. Cancellation does not follow the steps of the extension form. This text does not copy those steps. Which document will be renewed, and how the application is made, are not here. If the person both made an extension request and received a cancellation writing, the two steps stand side by side. The result of the extension request does not change the ground of cancellation of its own accord. If the cancellation writing refers to the extension request, the reference sentence is taken as the basis.
A first refusal, where a permit was never given, and cancellation of a permit that was given later, are not the same paper either. The first refusal belongs to a request that did not give rise to a card. Cancellation brings a permit that arose to an end. If both writings are in the file, each is read from its own operative sentence. The ground of one is not pasted onto the other.
The ground paragraph, and service
The ground says which fact in the cancellation writing was tied to the permit. Oral news of a cancellation does not take the place of this paragraph. A summary screen may not be the whole of the writing. The ground is not guessed while there is no full text. If more than one fact is counted in the ground, each fact is left on its own line. This page does not complete those facts with a standard list. Possible headings of cancellation are not listed here either. The ground is whatever it is. A cause that is not written in the paragraph is not added.
Which line is the cause of cancellation comes out of the paper that was served. The service record shows to whom the writing went. The record does not change the ground sentence. While there is no record, the writing is not assumed to have reached. A writing that went to the attorney and a writing that went to the person may not be the same record. Each record is tied to its own envelope. The record of one envelope is not used as the period of the other writing. If the address differs from the address on the form, the difference does not produce a provision. The two addresses are seen side by side.
If the decision is in another language, and a translation note is standing, the note is read together with the text. If there is no note, an oral translation is not counted as the ground paragraph. If separate cards were given to family members, each cancellation belongs to its own addressee. The cancellation on one card is not written by heart onto the other person’s document. If the child’s card is mentioned in the spouse’s writing, the sentence that is mentioned is looked for separately in the child’s own writing.
The sentence on return of the card
The cancellation writing can carry a sentence on giving the card back. If there is a sentence, that sentence is also read from the same text. If the sentence writes which unit the card will be left at, or was left at, it stays in the form it was written. This page does not produce a separate date for delivery. If the sentence does not carry a date, a date is not added either. If there is no sentence, a result treated as delivered is not built. The card standing in hand does not, on its own, tell either the return or the cancellation while there is no return sentence. The cancellation provision is still in the result part of the writing.
If the delivery minute is a separate paper, the minute does not take the place of the ground of cancellation. If the minute writes that the card was taken, that fact is in the minute. The reason for the cancellation is in the cancellation writing. The two papers are left side by side. If the signature line on the minute is empty, the gap is not filled in this text. The gap does not erase the cancellation writing either. If the writing is standing, the provision is in the writing. If there is no minute at all, a result of delivery is not announced from here either.
Non-extension, and other permit refusals
A refusal relating to a work permit does not carry the ground paragraph of the residence cancellation. Refusal of a work permit is read from its own notification. A sentence in the employer’s file does not stick of its own accord as the cause of cancellation of the residence card. If the cancellation writing refers to the work permit, the reference is as far as it appears in the cancellation text. If there is no reference, the two steps stay separate. The end date of the work card is not the date line of the residence cancellation.
Refusal of a citizenship application does not build the ground of cancellation either. If the citizenship writing mentions the residence cancellation, the sentence that is mentioned is taken as the basis. If it does not mention it, the citizenship refusal sentence is not treated as having brought the residence permit to an end. If the three writings stand in the same folder, there are three steps. One can be cancellation, another refusal, and another acceptance. An acceptance writing is not treated as having erased the cancellation part. Each writing is read from its own result sentence.
A removal petition is not built on this page
The cancellation writing is not a removal decision. If there is removal, it looks at its own service. How the objection is read is in the article on an objection to a removal decision. There is no petition text, request sentence, or application plan on this page. The ground of cancellation is not written again as the draft of that petition. If there is no paragraph on removal in the cancellation writing, a paragraph is not added from here. If there is a paragraph, it is separated from its own heading. The two headings can stand one under the other on a single page. Standing one under the other does not make the paragraphs a single provision.
The frame in which cancellation of the permit is read is the international law page. The name of the Act stands as the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458. Without a copy of the decision, it cannot be said which state the card is in after cancellation. Once the copy is standing, what is read is the ground paragraph and the result part. The concrete paper is not left to dress every file with the same result of the distinction on this page.
Conclusion
Cancellation is not expiry of the period, or a refusal to extend. The end on the card, and the card standing in hand, do not answer the ground of cancellation on their own. If there is a return sentence in the writing, it is read in the form it was written. A petition objecting to removal is not in this text. Work-permit and citizenship writings do not build the cancellation paragraph.