In short
An objection to a deportation decision is read from the text of the administrative decision served on the person and from the period written on it. A number of days is not frozen in this text. The article does not describe evading a border check, hiding a document, or treating the decision as nonexistent. The question of how the objection is read is answered when the service annotation and the reasons of the decision are set side by side. A draft that has not been served is not treated as having started the period, and the petition does not complete an incomplete decision either. Without the oral summary, the reasons, and the service annotation standing, the target of the objection has not been stated, and a number of days is not produced from the draft.
What is read in the text of the decision
The place that is read is the result of the decision, its reasons, and the service record. The period is not started by rote as the day the decision was made. Whatever the paper that was served says, the period is read from there. An oral summary without reasons does not stand in for the text of the decision. The application petition should show which decision it is against, with the file number and the date of service. Without the date being written, the period is not treated as having started, and an internal note is not put in place of the decision that was served. Without the file number being written, the target of the application is not built.
The service annotation starts the period
The service envelope is the document of the period calculation. While the envelope is not there, a day is not invented. The other side's oral date is not put in place of the service annotation. If there is no copy of the decision in the file, the target of the objection cannot be stated either. The address in Çankaya does not by itself lock the court that will look at the decision to that district. The competent place comes from the service and the procedural rule. The province where the decision was written does not lock every application to that province either. The competent court is read from the service.
The petition does not stop the implementation
Filing the objection petition does not mean the deportation stopped by itself. Whether implementation will be stayed is read from the court's interim decision on that request. It is not said that the person who filed the petition will remain in the country. The decision, the service, and the request for a stay are separate documents. One does not stand in for the other. Before the interim decision issues, a result of remaining in the country is not spoken, and the date of the petition is not written in place of the service annotation. Before the interim decision issues, a result of remaining in the country is not spoken.
The competent court comes from the text
The objection is directed at the decision that was served, not at the administration's internal note. The province where the decision was written does not lock every application to that province's court. Extension of a residence permit and refusal of a work permit are separate administrative acts. A blue card is not the objection petition against a deportation decision either. Which act is in hand is read from the document that was served. Residence, work-permit, or blue-card papers cannot be presented as the objection petition against the deportation decision. Each administrative act looks to its own service.
Evading a check is not this subject
This heading does not describe passing a check at the border gate, hiding identity, or not applying the decision. The subject is with which papers an objection to a decision that has been served is read. The application petition is not a set of directions that crosses this limit either. Choice of the applicable law belongs to a contract dispute and is not pasted onto an administrative deportation decision. An invoice or a private contract does not stand in for the administrative decision. This heading does not describe passing a check, hiding identity, or not applying the decision either, and a contract does not stand in for the administrative decision.
Conclusion
An objection to deportation is read from the text of the decision that was served and from the period written on it. A count of days is not fixed here. The general frame stands on the Ankara international-law lawyer page and in the text of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458. Without a copy of the decision, the service, and the petition, the target of the objection cannot be stated. Evading a check is not the subject of this reading. While the copy of the decision, the service, and the petition do not stand, a count of days is not announced either. An oral date does not hold the place of the annotation. While the copy of the decision, the service annotation, and the petition do not stand, the target of the objection is not stated. Before the interim decision issues, a result of remaining in the country is not built. Residence or work-permit papers are not put in place of this decision. An invoice does not stand in for the administrative decision. A count of days is not produced from a draft. A draft that has not been served does not start the period. An internal note is not put in place of the decision, and an oral summary does not hold the place of the reasons either.