In short
In a charge of unauthorised work, the place that is read is the name, the workplace, and the date line on the permit, and the workplace and the date line on the charge paper. If the two lines do not overlap, that they do not overlap is written. The overlap does not build the result of its own accord either. How work would be done without a permit is not in this article. The employer’s penalty tariff, and the amount, are not written either.
The name, the workplace, and the date on the permit
The permit is the paper that shows in whose name, for which employer and which workplace, and between which dates it was drawn up. The reading starts with these four lines. The name line is placed side by side with the name of the person who is charged. If there is a difference of spelling, the difference is not closed. The employer’s title and the address of the workplace may not stand on the same line. Whichever address the charge writes, the comparison is with that address. The name of another branch, a warehouse, or a home address does not take the place of the workplace line on the document. If there is no door number in the address, a number is not added.
If the line is empty, the gap is not filled with a step that is remembered, or with a step on another document. If there is no document, a permit is not treated as existing. The old dates of a document whose period has ended do not give birth to a new permit. The end is on the document. This text does not put an added period onto that end. The start line of the document is not pulled to the beginning of the period of the charge either. If the two date intervals do not overlap, the part that does not overlap is written separately. The part that overlaps does not announce of its own accord that the charge is right or wrong.
If there is a profession or duty line on the document, that line is read as well. If the charge paper writes another job, the two job names are left side by side. One is not put in place of the other. If the duty line is empty, a duty is not invented. If the photograph of the document and the original conflict, what is read is which copy is standing in the file. The photograph does not take the place of the original on its own. It is not said that there is a permit before the original is seen.
The workplace line of the charge
If the charge paper writes the workplace that is alleged, and the period that is alleged, the reading is on those two lines. If the minute records an inspection visit, the place of the visit and the observation that passed into the record are read as far as they are written in the minute. If how the observation will be interpreted does not stand as a sentence in the minute, this text does not add an interpretation. If the workplace on the permit and the address in the minute are not the same, the difference is shown in the petition with the two lines side by side. If the date interval carries outside the document, the period that carries over is written separately. How the period that carries over was spent is not told. The subject is what the papers wrote.
If the charge is oral and there is no writing, the charge is not treated as completed. If the minute does not show which record and which address it held, the missing line is not completed later. A witness account is not put in place of the empty line in the minute. If a witness’s name appears in the minute, the name stays as it is written there. A summary of the account is not pasted in place of the sentence of the minute. If the signature or initials line is empty, the gap is not filled with a signature remembered later.
If more than one foreigner appears in the same minute, each name is left on its own line. One person’s permit does not confirm the line of the person beside them. If the minute gathers everyone at the workplace into a single sentence as if they had worked in the same period, the sentence is read as it is. A result is not built before the sentence is separated person by person. If the separation is not in the minute, this text does not invent a separation.
The end of the period and a refusal are not the same charge
A refusal of the application is a notification of a permit that never arose. That writing stays under refusal of a work permit. The ending of the period of a permit that was given is not a refusal. The cancellation of a permit that was given is not a refusal either. Which one it is is read from the heading of the paper in hand. If there is no heading, a name of the step is not invented. If there is a cancellation writing, that writing is not put in place of the charge minute. A refusal writing does not confirm the workplace line in the minute of its own accord either. If there are three papers, there are three readings.
A residence card does not confirm the workplace line of its own accord. The end date of the card is not the date of the period of the charge. Whether the residence was extended is the subject of the heading a residence permit not being extended. The residence document is not put in place of the workplace line of the charge of unauthorised work. If the address on the card is a residence address, this address is not written as the workplace on the permit. Even if the two addresses are the same, being the same does not close the charge. If they differ, the difference is written from the two documents.
The route of working without a permit is not written
This heading does not tell the route of working without a permit, of hiding the record, or of avoiding the inspection. Passing behind another title, not appearing at the home or at the site, and splitting the record are not told either. The reading is placing side by side the lines of the paper served on the person who is charged, and of the permit. In this article the worker is the person who is charged. The sanction paper on which the employer is the administrative addressee is separate. The two papers are not joined as a single charge.
If the image of the permit and the workplace line of the charge minute do not stand in the same file, the comparison stays half finished. A missing document is not completed by being put in place of the other. The person saying orally that the person has a permit does not create the document line. The employer saying that the employer obtained the permit does not add the name either if that person’s name is not on the document. The word is read only if it has passed as a sentence in the minute.
The penalty tariff is not inside this charge
The administrative sanction written to the employer carries its own addressee line. The amount and the tariff are looked for in that writing. This text does not publish a tariff, does not put a lira, and does not write a rate of increase or reduction. If there is no amount on the worker’s charge paper, the amount is not copied from the employer’s writing. The number of workers, the number of days, or a repetition does not build a multiplication on this page. If the sanction writing and the charge minute stand in the same folder, each is read from its own addressee. The figure of one is not carried to the other.
A removal decision is not inside this charge either. If there is one, it is read from the heading an objection to a removal decision, with its own service. If there is no sentence of leaving the country in the charge minute, a result of leaving is not built from the minute. A residence writing is not the penalty line of the charge either. The three steps carry three headings.
A missing line is not completed from another document
The comparison ends with the lines of the two papers in hand. The name on the passport can be placed side by side with the name on the permit. If there is a difference, the difference is written. The difference does not confirm the charge of its own accord, or drop it. If the passport number is not on the document, a number is not added. A visa stamp does not take the place of the workplace line. An entry and exit record does not draw the working period in the minute of its own accord. If the record is standing in the file, it is read from its own date. If there is no date, a period is not invented.
The petition is for showing the two lines side by side. The petition does not narrow or widen the charge by adding an address that is not in the minute, or a period that is not there. A line that is seen to be missing is written as missing. It is not told as if it were completed. If there is no service annotation, it is not assumed that the charge paper reached the person either. The record on the annotation is not copied from the record of another step.
If the permit and the charge paper are standing, the lines can be looked at side by side through contact. The frame is on the international law page. The basis is the texts of the International Labour Force Law No. 6735 and the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458. If an article number is not written on the document, this text does not put a number. An article that appears on the document is left as it is on the document.
If an institution name stands in the heading of the inspection minute, the institution is read from that heading. If there is no heading, an institution is not chosen. If a photograph, an attendance list, or a similar printout is in the annex of the minute, the annex does not widen the sentence of the minute of its own accord. If an address is written in the annex, the address is the annex’s own line. This text does not produce a wage or a penalty from that line. If the annex and the minute conflict, the conflict is read by separating which paper carries which line. The conflict does not close the charge, and it does not confirm it. If the sentence that the worker refused to sign the minute is in the minute, the sentence stays there. The absence of a signature does not make the minute without effect of its own accord. A judgment is not built from this page.
If a separate application is awaited for renewal of the permit, the waiting does not change the workplace line of the old document. If there is no acceptance writing of the renewal, the period of the charge is compared with the date interval of the old document. If there is an acceptance writing, the new workplace is read from that writing. If the old document and the new writing stand in the same file, both are kept. One does not erase the other’s address. A renewal that is waiting does not take the place of the charge minute.
Conclusion
A charge of unauthorised work is read from the workplace and date lines of the permit and of the charge paper. A refusal, the end of the period, and cancellation are not the names of this charge. There is no method of working without a permit. The employer’s penalty is a separate paper, and its tariff is not written here. A missing line is not completed from another document.