In short
The voluntary departure period is what is written on the line set aside for this matter on the deportation decision. This article answers that line. The line is not found on every decision. A period is not added from memory. There is no method of missing the period. The objection route is not written from the start. If the decision does not carry a period line, the period is not completed from another decision or from an oral description.
The period line is on the decision
The place that is read is the line set aside for voluntary departure in the deportation decision. If the line carries a period or a date, the period is that. The figure is not carried onto this page. The line shows the period the decision recognised for the person to leave the country by his own means. If there is no line, this recognition is not treated as having been made, and this text does not add a line.
If the start of the line is also written in the decision, or in the service record of that decision, it is read from there. If it is not written, a start is not invented. A word said at the door does not stand in for the line of the decision. If the word and the line conflict, the line is kept. A draft that was not served is not treated as having opened the period. Which copy was served is separated from the service record. The gap in the draft is not filled from the line of the copy that was served.
If the decision is more than one page, the line is looked for in the paragraph set aside as voluntary departure. A date in another paragraph is not chosen as the departure period. The date of service, the period in which the objection will be read, and the departure line may be three separate things. All three stand in their own place. One is not added to another to produce a new period. This page does not put a figure for any of the three either.
This line may not be found on every decision
Some deportation decisions do not carry a voluntary departure line. Not carrying it is not filled as a template that was printed incomplete. Whatever the decision text says, that stands. The statute does not build a duty on the administration to recognise this period in every decision. If a reasoning relating to public order, public security, public health, or a risk of flight is written in the decision, the reasoning is in the decision. The reasoning is not completed from this page. How the reasoning would be overcome is not recounted either.
The line not being found does not mean the person was permitted to stay in the country. The line being found does not mean the deportation decision was lifted either. The decision stands with its own result whether there is a line or not. The result sentence is read separately from the departure line. The two are not mixed.
The period in a decision belonging to another foreigner is not added to this decision. This page does not grant a period for a weekend, an official holiday, or a journey. The line in an old decision of the same person does not pass to the new decision of itself either. If the new decision carries its own line, that line is taken as the basis. Whether the old decision is in force is read from there, if the new writing says this. If it does not say it, the old line is not pasted onto the new decision.
An objection petition does not stop the period of itself
How an objection to a deportation decision is read is under an objection to a deportation decision. That reading is not built from the start here. The order of the petition, the calculation of the service annotation, and the steps of a stay request are not copied onto this page. The giving of the objection papers does not stop the voluntary departure period of itself.
If a stay appears in the court's own writing, or in the decision's own writing, it is read from there. If it does not appear, a result of staying in the country is not said. The date of the petition is not written as the start of the departure line. A request for a stay of execution is not treated as accepted by the request paper having been given. The acceptance is in the court's writing. If there is no writing, acceptance is not assumed to exist.
The departure line and the objection period are not the same thing. One is the period of leaving on the decision. The other is where the objection will be read, and according to which writing. The second question is not opened again under this heading. The two periods are not added to each other from memory. Not adding them means not giving a figure. This page does not put a figure for either period.
If the objection was refused, the refusal does not rewrite the departure line of itself. The refusal writing is read separately. If the departure line stands, it stays in the decision where it stood. If a new administrative writing changed the line, the text that changed is in that writing. If there is no change, the first line is taken as the basis.
A residence paper and a work paper do not add to the period
The end date on the residence document is not pasted onto the departure line. A residence permit not being extended is a separate notice. The extension request having been given does not write a period onto the voluntary departure line. The acceptance of the extension does not extend the line of the decision of itself either. If there is an acceptance writing, it is read from its own result. A refusal does not erase the departure period. Each document's date stays in its own act.
A refusal of a work permit is not a source of a period either. The date in the refusal writing is not put in the place of the departure period. The work-permit paper standing with the person does not change the period line of the decision. An employer's invitation is not a document that adds to the voluntary departure line. Three dates may stand side by side in the same folder. Standing side by side does not make them a single period.
A photocopy of the application petition cannot be presented as a writing in which the administration recognised a period. The period is only on the decision's own line, or in a later writing that changes that line. If there is no later writing, the first line stands. If there is no first line either, the period is treated as absent.
An exit ban does not open the departure line
An exit-ban annotation is not put in the place of the departure line. The annotation is a separate record that the exit is closed. The voluntary departure line does not lift the annotation of itself. While the annotation stands, a result of free exit is not built from the departure line. If there are two records, both are read in their own papers. If the lifting of the annotation appears in the writing of the authority that put the annotation, it is read from there. If it does not appear, it is not treated as lifted.
This article does not recount not using the period, hiding during the period, leaving from an unregistered place, or counting silence as an extension. It does not carry a method for missing the period. If the decision writes in its own sentence what happens if the period is not used, that sentence is in the decision and is not turned into a figure here. If there is no sentence, a result is not invented. A prohibition period is not added to this text.
If the period line of the decision is in hand, it is reached from the contact page. Contact does not put a period that is not on the line. The line, the service record, and the annotation if there is one are put side by side. One is not written in the other's place.
Where on the decision the line is looked for
When the decision text is opened, the paragraph that carries the expression of voluntary departure is looked for. If the paragraph writes a period or a date, the period is that. The figure is not taken onto this page. If there is no paragraph, it means the decision did not recognise this period. Not recognising it is not filled as a missing page. If the reasoning is written in the same decision, the reasoning is there. If there is a sentence relating to public order, public security, public health, or a risk of flight, the sentence is in the decision. How the sentence would be made ineffective is not recounted. The absence of the line is not read as permission to stay in the country either.
The service record is the second look. If the start of the line was tied to the service record, the start is read from there. If it was not tied, a start is not invented. The word at the door does not stand in for the paragraph. If the draft and the copy that was served are different, the copy that was served is taken as the basis. If there is no service annotation, the line is not treated as having opened the period. The line of an old decision does not pass to the new decision of itself. If a new writing changed the line, the text that changed is in that writing.
The third look is set aside for the objection file. The giving of the objection petition does not stop the departure line of itself. If the court wrote a stay, the writing is read from its own sentence. If it did not write it, a result of staying in the country is not said. The objection period and the departure line are not added to each other. This page does not put a figure for the two periods either. A refusal of the objection does not rewrite the departure line of itself.
The fourth look is residence, the work permit, and the exit ban. These three do not add a period to the departure line. While the annotation stands, a free exit is not built from the departure line. An employer's invitation is not a document that adds to the line either. Not using the period, hiding, or leaving unregistered is not the subject of this search. If there is no line, the period is treated as absent. If there is a line, only that line is read.
Conclusion
The voluntary departure period is what is written on the line set aside on the deportation decision. The line is not found on every decision. If there is no line, a period is not added. An objection petition does not stop the period of itself. A residence permit, a work permit, and an exit-ban annotation do not write a period onto this line. There is no method of missing the period in this text. The frame stands on the international law page and in the text of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection numbered 6458.