In short
If an exit-ban annotation is placed on a foreigner, the record seen at passport control is that exit is closed. This writing answers that record. The annotation is not a removal decision. An entry ban is another record as well. Flight across the border is not narrated. The general definition of judicial control, and the list of obligations, are not opened here. A seal sentence, a colour, and a page number are not invented.
The record read at control
An exit-ban annotation is the record showing that exit is closed to the person. What is looked at in control is this record. This text does not say that a particular sentence was printed on a particular page of the booklet. If such a sentence is written in the decision or in the minute, it is read from there. If it is not written, a sentence is not added. The wording shown on the screen or in the minute is kept. The wording is not changed with a memorised code list.
If a control minute was drawn up, the minute shows the record at that moment. The minute is not a decision that lifts the annotation. If the wording written in the minute and an older decision conflict, both are kept. This page does not tie the conflict to a result of free exit. A word heard at an airport or at a land border does not take the place of the decision. If the word and the record conflict, the record is kept.
The source of the annotation is looked for in the decision that placed it. The source can be a criminal court's decision. The source can also be an administrative transaction. If the decision does not write the source, a source list is not completed from this page. If the result of the decision says whether the annotation was lifted, that sentence is in the decision. If there is no sentence, a lifting is not assumed.
The annotation is separate from a removal decision
A removal decision is a separate administrative transaction built about the foreigner. An exit-ban annotation is not the text of that decision. Both can affect travel. This likeness does not join the papers. If the person has only the annotation, a removal decision is not read as if it existed. If the person has only a removal decision, the annotation is not derived from that decision by itself. If both exist, each is read from its own paper.
How an objection to a removal decision is read is under objection to a removal decision. The application order under that heading is not copied here as the explanation of the exit-ban annotation. Whether the annotation will be lifted is not promised either. The result of a request for lifting is looked for in the written answer. Giving the request paper does not mean the annotation has fallen. If there is no request at all, the annotation is not treated as having fallen by itself.
An entry ban is a separate record that restricts coming to the country. An exit ban shows that leaving the country is closed. The names of the two records are not put in each other's place. An entry-ban paper does not erase the exit annotation. An exit annotation does not open the entry ban either. Each is in its own writing.
The booklet standing with the person does not erase the annotation
The passport standing with the person does not mean the annotation is absent. The booklet and the annotation record are placed side by side. If there is no ban sentence written in the booklet, this page does not produce a sentence. If an electronic record or a police extract shows a ban, that extract is kept. If there is no extract and there is no decision either, the annotation is not produced from this text.
If the passport stands in the hand of an employer, a hotel, or a relative, this state does not mean the annotation was lifted. Whose hand the booklet is in, and the annotation record, are separate questions. The path of giving or taking the booklet is not narrated on this page. What is read is the annotation record itself.
If there is no decision copy, the ground of the annotation is not completed. If the ground was asked for and the writing arrived, the writing is taken as the basis. If the writing that arrived is another person's decision, it is not stuck onto this person's annotation. The file number, the authority that placed the decision, and the operative sentence are looked for on the same paper. If there is no number, a number is not invented.
A ticket and a permit paper do not lift the annotation
This heading does not narrate passing the gate while the annotation stands, another border point, another document, or concealing the booklet. A ticket, another country's visa, or an employer's writing does not lift the annotation. These papers are preparation for travel. They are not put in place of the annotation record. If the annotation was shown at control, the minute of that moment is kept. The minute is not turned into a description of treating the annotation as absent.
Non-extension of a residence permit is not a document that erases the annotation. The residence card standing with the person is not presented as proof that exit is open either. The card shows the type of the residence permit. It does not show the exit record. An extension-refusal writing is not the ground of the annotation. If the refusal and the annotation stand in the same folder, there are two transactions.
Refusal of a work permit does not drop the annotation either. Acceptance of the work-permit paper does not open the exit ban. The employer's invitation writing does not take the place of the record at border control. Each document shows its own transaction. The annotation stays in its own record.
The judicial-control list and the departure line are not here
Even if the annotation comes from a measure in a criminal trial, judicial control is not defined here. The other obligations of the measure are not counted. Headings such as signature, dwelling, or security are not opened. The only separation that is read is this: the record that exit is closed is different from a removal decision. If the name of the source is written in the decision that placed the annotation, it is read from there.
Mixing leaving the country with a voluntary-departure line is not the subject of this writing either. Voluntary departure is a line written separately on the removal decision. An exit-ban annotation does not open that line by itself. A result that exit is free is not built while the annotation stands. If the departure line is there and the annotation also stands, both are read. One is not treated as having erased the other. The departure line itself is not rebuilt on this page.
If the annotation and the decision copy will be placed side by side, the office is reached from the contact page. Contact does not lift the annotation. If the lifting appears in a written answer, it is read from there.
How the annotation record is read with the decision copy
The person who sees the annotation first keeps the control extract or the minute. If the extract shows that exit is closed, the record that is read is this. Then the decision that placed the annotation is looked for. If the decision belongs to a criminal court, the operative sentence is in that decision. If the decision belongs to an administrative transaction, the result is looked for in that transaction. If the decision cannot be found, the ground is not completed from this page. The other obligations of judicial control are not listed. Which measures it stood beside is not counted either.
The decision and the extract are placed side by side. If the decision writes that the annotation was lifted, that sentence is taken as the basis. If it does not write it, the closing on the extract continues. A request for lifting having been given is not a lifting. If the answer to the request is in a separate writing, the answer is read from there. If there is no answer, the annotation stands. The date of the request paper is not written as the moment the annotation fell.
The passport booklet is placed beside this pair. If there is no sentence written in the booklet, a sentence is not invented. The booklet standing with the person, with the employer, or with a relative does not erase the record on the extract. A ticket, a visa, and a work permit stay apart as a third bundle. This bundle does not lift the annotation. A residence card does not show that exit is open. An extension-refusal writing is not the ground of the annotation either.
Whether the control point is air, land, or sea, the record that is read does not change. The name of the point does not lift the annotation. If a short waiting minute was given, the minute is kept. The minute is not a lifting decision. If the authority that placed the annotation is written in the minute, the authority is noted from there. If it is not written, an authority name is not added from this page.
If there is a removal decision and a voluntary-departure line, they are also read apart. The annotation is not the text of the removal decision. The departure line does not give birth to a result of free exit while the annotation stands. Passing by another gate, with another document, or by concealing the booklet is not narrated. If the officer's word and the extract conflict, the extract is kept. The word does not take the place of the decision copy. The conflict is not tied to free exit.
Conclusion
An exit-ban annotation placed on a foreigner is the record showing at passport control that exit is closed, and it is not a removal decision. The booklet standing with the person does not erase the annotation. A ticket, a residence card, and a work-permit record do not lift it. A seal text is not invented. Flight across the border, and a judicial-control list, are not in this text. The frame is in the name of the international law page and the Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection.