In short
If an exit ban is placed on a foreign accused, the residence card is not cancelled of itself. The ban is read from the decision in the criminal file. The card's record is read from a separate document. Crossing the ban is not in this text. A day and an article number are not written.
The text of the ban is not cancellation of the card
If an exit ban is written under that name in the decision given about the accused, it is read from there. If the decision prohibits leaving the country, the ban is that sentence. The sentence does not write a cancellation annotation onto the residence card. If cancellation is the administration's own act, the act that issued the card or the permit, it is read from that act. If there is no act, the card is not treated as cancelled by the ban sentence. The card remaining in hand does not show that the ban has been lifted either. The two facts are left side by side.
The ban may also stand among judicial-control obligations. If there is a list, the list is read. If an exit ban is not on the list, another obligation is not turned into an exit ban. A signature or an address notice does not take the place of the exit-ban sentence. A ban is not declared before the list is read. If the list has more than one line, each line stays under its own name. If it is not written that one line was breached, a breach is not produced from another line.
If a minute later than the date of the decision writes that it lifts the ban, the lifting is read from that minute. If it does not write that, the first sentence stands. An oral account that "the ban is over" does not take the place of the decision text. If a marginal note on the minute does not touch the ban, the note is not treated as a ban ruling.
The residence record is read from a separate document
A residence card or a residence-permit writing is not the paper of the ban. The period on the card is looked for on the card or on the permit writing. That period is not carried into this text as the day the ban will end. A day count is not frozen. If there is no date on the card, a date is not invented. An old photocopy does not give birth to a new cancellation act. If there is no cancellation stamp on the photocopy, it is not read as if the stamp were there.
A notice of non-extension is a separate administrative writing. Reading that writing is under a residence permit not being extended. Non-extension is not built from the sentence of the exit ban. The ban is not written of itself as the reason for non-extension. If the administration put the reason in its own writing, the reason is read from there. If it did not, the ban text is not pasted in place of the reason. If the criminal file is mentioned in the reason, the mention does not change the text of the ban. The mention stands as far as it is written.
The type of the card may be short-term, family, or another legend. The legend is whatever is written on the card. The type does not widen or narrow the scope of the exit ban. The scope is in the sentence of the ban decision. If the sentence only prohibits exit, the address or occupation line on the card does not add a further obligation to the ban. If the addition is not written on the list, it is not written.
The passport being in hand does not lift the ban
If the passport is in the person's hand, that does not mean there is no exit ban. The ban is read from the sentence in the decision, not from the physical place of the passport. If it is written separately that the passport was surrendered, that line is also read apart. If there is no surrender line, it is not treated as surrendered. Surrender is not cancellation of the card either. Cancellation still requires the administration's own writing. If the passport was returned, the return is in its own minute. The return minute is not treated as having erased the ban decision. If erasure is written in the continuation of the ban decision or in a later decision, it is read.
Entry and exit stamps in the passport do not take the place of the ban text. A stamp is the trace of a crossing. The ban is the decision sentence. If the stamp belongs to a time before the ban, the earlier crossing does not lift the ban. If the stamp belongs to a time after the ban, this page does not narrate how the crossing was made. To narrate it would be a way of crossing the ban. If there is a stamp, it stands as a stamp. If there is none, the absence does not mean the ban was never placed.
Practice at a border gate is not described on this page. A description would be how the ban would be crossed. Crossing, concealing a document, and flight are not here. A sentence to be said at the gate is not written either.
A removal decision is not the same paper as this ban
A removal decision is an administrative act directed at taking the person out of the country. An exit ban is a criminal-procedure measure that restricts leaving. The two sentences can stand in the file at the same time. Their standing does not turn one into the other. If a removal decision has been served, an objection to a removal decision is read from its own text. This page does not copy an application text for that writing. It does not give a sample petition.
It is not said that the removal decision has been lifted because the ban was lifted. It is not said that the exit ban has been lifted because the removal decision was lifted. Each lifting is read if it is written in its own decision. If there is no writing, the lifting is not completed. The start of a removal operation is not treated as having dropped the ban of itself. If it is written that the ban continues, the continuation is from that writing. If the writing is silent, this text does not add a dropping.
An administrative-detention document is not an exit ban either. If detention is the heading of an administrative record, it is read under its own name. The heading is not put in place of the ban list in the criminal file. Even if the two headings were born on the same day, their sentences stay apart.
A work-permit writing is not the ban sentence
A work-permit document is not the paper of the exit ban. The permit is the administrative record of work. The ban is the restriction in the criminal file. If the permit document is in hand, the work record is read from its own period. The period is not carried as the day the ban will end. A refusal of a work permit is a separate notice. The refusal writing is not added of itself as the reason of the ban decision. If the reason stands in the refusal writing, it is read from there. If the work permit is not mentioned in the ban text, a mention is not invented.
A petition written by the employer does not lift the ban. Lifting requires the own writing of the authority that gave the ban decision. If the employer's petition is in the file, it stands as a petition. It does not take the place of the decision. The work permit having ended does not set up the ban of itself either. If the ban is not in the criminal decision, it is not born from the end of the permit document.
Crossing the ban is not the subject of this writing
How one would leave the country while the ban stands, how a document would be concealed, or what would be said at the gate is not narrated. Committing an offence is not here either. The subject is reading the paper of the ban and the residence record apart. If the two documents conflict, the conflict is not removed by treating one as the cancellation of the other. Each document is left with its own sentence. A new date that would remove the conflict is not chosen from this page either.
The frame of the ban is on the criminal law page. The frame of the residence record is on the international law page. If the decision and the card are side by side, contact is made with the text of both. While only one document is in hand, the other is not announced as cancelled.
Which court or judgeship writing the ban came from is read from the heading of the decision. If there is no heading, the name of the authority is not chosen from this page. If the same person has more than one criminal file, the ban is tied to the number of the file in which it is written. An obligation in another file is not carried into this file as a ban. To carry it would be to treat as present a line that is not on the list. The list stays in whichever file it is in.
A petition attached to an application to renew the card does not take the place of the ban decision. If the petition was written to the administration, it is an administrative paper. The ban is in the criminal decision. If the ban is mentioned in the petition, the mention is the sentence of the petition. The mention is not treated as having lifted the ban. If a lifting writing does not stand separately, the card application is not read as the result of the ban. If there is an acceptance or refusal annotation on the application, the annotation belongs to the card's own act. The annotation is not an announcement that exit is free.
If an obligation to report an address stands on the list, that obligation is read under its own name. If there is a minute that the address changed, the minute does not mean the ban was lifted. The new address does not erase the exit-ban sentence. Erasure still requires the continuation of the ban decision or a later decision. If there is no later decision, the first sentence stands. If the period of the first sentence is not written inside the decision, a period is not added to this text.
Conclusion
An exit ban does not cancel the residence card or the permit document of itself. The card is read from its own period, and the ban from its own decision. The passport being in hand does not lift the ban. A removal decision and a work-permit writing are not a copy of this ban. Crossing the ban is not written. There is no period and no article number. The ban is read from the decision in the frame of Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271. The residence record is read apart from the text of Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection.