In short
A foreign child's school enrolment is not the same paper as a document of the type of residence. If enrolment is refused, the place that is read is the ground line of the refusal writing. Return of the child, a transfer of custody, and sending back between countries are not here.
The enrolment form is not a residence document
The school enrolment form shows which school, and which term, the child was written into. A residence document is a separate administrative document showing the type and the period of the stay. Even if a photocopy of the card was attached on the form, the photocopy does not become the form itself. If the child line on the form is blank, the parent's card is not treated as having opened the enrolment. If the child's name is not on the form, the enrolment is not treated as opened for that child.
The name of the type of residence is whatever is written on the card. A short-term, family, or student wording is in the card's own text. This page does not declare which type is sufficient in every enrolment. The type and the form are placed side by side. Extension of a residence permit is the notification about the period of the card. That notification does not complete the school's enrolment form. The ground in a non-extension writing does not mean the form was accepted either.
If the term of the form writes the teaching year or the semester, the term is on that line. If there is no line, the term is not produced from the end day of the card. The card can be longer or shorter than a year. This length does not choose the term of the form by itself. If the choice is not written on the form, it is not written. The previous year's enrolment document is not the form of the new term. If the old document stands in the file, it belongs to its old term.
If a change of school is in a separate writing, the writing carries its own date. The first school's enrolment form is not read as the second school's acceptance writing. If the names of the two schools differ, the names stay apart. One does not fill the other's ground line.
The ground line writes what it refused
The ground line is looked for in the refusal writing. The line can say a missing document, an address, or a type of residence. Whatever it says, the refusal is that. If there is no line, the school's oral explanation is not put in place of the ground. If a screen image is a single word, the single word is not taken as the whole of the ground. The full line is asked for. A cut image is not completed by adding a sentence in place of the cut part.
If the ground says residence, which document is missing, or which type was written, stands in the continuation of the line. If there is no continuation, the type of residence is not treated as a completed ground of refusal. If the ground says address, the type of residence is not added to that line by itself. If there are two grounds in the same writing, each is read from its own line. One is not joined as the explanation of the other.
The addressee of the refusal writing can be the child's name or the applicant's name. If there is no addressee line, it is not seen for which person the refusal was built. A refusal that went out in the parent's name is not treated as the child's enrolment having been refused while the child line is blank. A refusal that went out in the child's name is not cancellation of the parent's residence. If cancellation is a separate administrative transaction, it is read from that transaction.
If a missing document was listed, the list is limited to the items as written. A document that is not on the list is not added as missing. If the list says "other" and the other's name is missing, the other is not completed. If the completion stands in the school's later writing, it is read from that writing.
The parent's permit is not the child's enrolment
The mother's or the father's work permit is not the child's school enrolment. Refusal of a work permit is a separate service. Refusal of a work permit is read from that service. The parent's refusal writing is not stuck onto the child's enrolment form. Even if the parent's card is valid, the ground on the child's form is read from its own line. The card being valid does not erase the ground line.
The parent's residence and the child's residence may not be the same card. If there are two cards, there are two periods. One's end is not copied as the other's ground of enrolment. The child's passport is not the ground line of the school form either. If the passport number was written on the form, the number is for identity. The number does not build the ground of the refusal by itself.
Who the guardian is is read from there if it is written on the form or in an additional document. If it is not written, the capacity of guardian is not chosen from this page. A divorce, custody, or recognition decision does not take the place of the school form. If those decisions exist, they are in their own files. The decision is not stuck onto the school's ground line. If it is stuck on, the form is taken as a custody judgment. The form is a writing about enrolment.
A step-sibling's, or another child's, enrolment document does not open this child's form. The sibling's acceptance writing does not erase this child's refusal line. Each child is read from their own name line. Even if the names carry the same surname, the forms are separate.
An address line and a passport line do not complete the ground
If the address line stands on the form or in the civil register, it is on its own paper. If the address is blank, the school's ground of refusal is not treated as completed as address. For it to be completed, the ground line is looked for as saying address. If the line says a missing document, the missing document is looked for in the continuation of the line. If there is no address in the continuation, address is not declared a missing document.
The period of the passport can differ from the term of the form. The difference is not written by itself as the ground of refusal. If the ground line says passport, the cause is read from there. If it does not, the passport date is not made the ground of the school refusal. A date is not invented. A day count is not frozen either.
An address-record extract and the school form are not the same paper. If the extract is blank, the gap does not mean the form was refused. If the form carries an acceptance writing, the acceptance is in the form's own sentence. If the extract was filled later, the filling does not erase the earlier refusal writing retrospectively. If the erasure stands in the school's later writing, it is read from that writing.
Return and removal are not school enrolment
Return of the child, recognition of custody, or sending back to a country is not built from the school's refusal writing. This page does not explain those paths. Refusal of school enrolment is not a removal decision either. If there is a removal writing, objection to a removal decision is read from its own service. The foreign-nationality wording in the refusal writing does not produce a removal decision. The wording can be the identity box on the form. The box is not an administrative-removal operative part.
The enrolment form, the ground line, and any residence document are read separately. An enrolment result is not built before the school's later writing arrives. The later writing is not stuck in place of the first ground line. Each writing carries its own date. If the acceptance writing is after the refusal writing, the acceptance is read from its own sentence. The earlier refusal is not treated as never having been written. The two writings stand side by side.
The frame is on the international law page. If the form and the card are side by side, contact is made with the text of both. While there is a single paper, enrolment is not declared opened or closed.
If a class or section line stands on the form, the line shows where the enrolment was written. If the line is blank, a section is not produced from the ground of refusal. If the ground says quota, quota is that word. If there is no number beside the word, a number is not added to this text. If there is a number, the number belongs to that writing, and a quota table is not built here. The quota is not copied onto another school's form.
A transfer document is a separate paper. If a transfer was asked for, the request is in the transfer writing's own sentence. While there is no request, the enrolment form is not counted as a transfer petition. If the previous school's name stands in the transfer writing, the name is read from there. If the school name on the form and the name in the transfer differ, the two names are two institutions. One does not produce the other's acceptance. Whichever school's letterhead the acceptance writing is on, the result belongs to that school.
The child's birth record is not the ground line of the school form. A country name appearing on the birth document is not written by itself as the ground of refusal. If the cause stands on the school's ground line, it is read from there. If the birth record is not on the missing-document list, it is not added to the list. If it were added, a ground of refusal that does not exist would have been built. The ground stays limited to the line that was written.
Conclusion
School enrolment and the type of residence are not the same document. A refusal is read from the ground line. The parent's work permit, the address extract, and a removal decision do not take the place of this form. Return of the child is not in this writing. Which type of residence will suffice in every enrolment is not declared. The statute name of the stay document is the Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection. The school ground is not produced from that statute from memory.