In short
The employer reads, from the subject line of the writing that arrives, the allegation of whether a notification to the Social Security Institution was made. A work-permit document does not erase that line. A premium figure is not in this text. The arrangement of employing someone without insurance is not narrated. The formation of a company branch is not copied onto this page either. A residence card does not stand in place of the social-security line.
What the subject line alleges
If the subject line of the writing carries the allegation that the notification was not made to the Social Security Institution, the reading is there. If the line carries another institution's name, the allegation is not renamed as a social-security line. The addressee line may show the employer, the workplace, or another person. If the workplace's trade name and the commercial sign conflict, the trade name in the writing is taken as the basis.
The worker's name is on the identity line. A worker who is not on the line is not added to the writing from a payroll draft. If more than one name is listed, each name stays on its own line. A name that has been struck through is not read in place of the name that remains. The job description in the employment contract does not take the place of the subject line. The contract is not the social-security writing.
The service record shows whether the writing reached the employer. The record is not copied from the moment the worker is said to have started. If there is no record, the addressee is not built from a guess on the company stamp. If a writing was left with a representative, the representative line is read separately. The moment the representative saw it is not pasted in place of the record that belongs to the employer. If a subcontractor and a principal employer stand as two trade names, the allegation is read from the addressee in the writing. This page does not carry the allegation over to the other trade name. A Turkish addition on the sign does not change the trade name in the writing. If a workplace registration number is in the writing, the number is read together with the trade-name line. The number alone is not used as if it tied a worker who is not named in the writing to the allegation. If the registration number differs from the number on the payroll, the difference is not closed. The difference does not produce a figure as if there were a premium debt. There is no figure on this page.
The worker's name is not added from the payroll
If the worker's name is on the identity line, the allegation is limited to that name. A worker who is not on the line is not added to the writing from a payroll draft, a time sheet, or an oral list. If more than one name is listed, each name stays on its own line. A name that has been struck through is not read in place of the name that remains. The job description in the employment contract does not take the place of the subject line. The contract is not the social-security writing. If the day work started in the contract is not in the writing, it is not read as the day of notification.
An intern or part-time work, if it does not stand with that quality on the subject line of the writing, is not given that quality from this page. If the quality does stand there, the sentence is read in its own words. It is not renamed. If the identity number and the name conflict, the conflict is not closed. If the name on the permit document and the name on the social-security writing differ, the documents are not joined of themselves.
The work-permit document is separate
The work-permit document is not the social-security notification writing. A permit appearing on the document does not erase the social-security line. If there is no document, this text does not add a permit result to the social-security writing. A refusal of a work permit is a separate writing in which the application was not accepted. The reasons in that writing are not copied here. The sentences in the refusal writing do not take the place of the social-security subject line.
If the permit document and the social-security writing stand in the same file, the two headings are read apart. The date of one does not change the subject line of the other. If the employer's name on the document and the trade name on the social-security writing differ, the difference is not closed. Each paper is read from its own trade-name line. The text named as the basis of the permit document bears the name Law No. 6735 on International Labour Force. That name does not fill the subject line of the social-security writing of itself. If the end day of the permit document is not in the social-security writing, that day is not added to the subject line. If the employer's name on the document and the trade name on the social-security writing differ, the difference is not closed. Each paper is read from its own trade-name line. The receipt of a work-permit application is not a social-security notification either. The receipt does not say that the notification was made.
There is no premium and no arrangement of employment
A premium figure, interest, or a debt figure is not written on this page. If the figure is on the writing that was served, it stays there and is not carried here. If there is no line, a figure is not produced. The arrangement of employing someone without insurance is not narrated. The wage in the employment contract is not put in place of the premium line.
A payroll draft is not the social-security writing either. A column on the draft, if it is not in the writing that was served, is not added to the allegation. If the writing carries a debt line, the existence of that line is seen. The figure on the line is not taken onto this page. If a service statement is in hand, the statement does not take the place of the writing that was served. If the month on the statement and the allegation in the writing conflict, the conflict is not closed. If there is no statement, the absence does not produce a premium figure. The month in which the notification appears missing is read from the writing's own line. If the line does not carry a month, a month is not chosen from the payroll draft. If more than one month is listed, each month stays on its own line. If one month has been struck through, the struck month is not read in place of the month that remains. The employer's correction petition is not treated as having erased the subject line of the writing that was served. If the result of the petition is in a separate writing, that writing is read from its own sentence. If there is no result writing, the petition is not announced as having dropped the allegation. The wage figure in the petition is not taken onto this page either.
Formation of a branch is not this writing
Registration of a foreign company's branch is not a social-security notification writing. The registry record, the capital, and the branch manager's authority are not narrated on this page. A foreign company's branch in Turkey is a separate reading. The branch record does not fill the worker's social-security line of itself.
If the workplace address appears in the writing, the address is read from that line. The address is not completed from a branch-formation petition. A Turkish addition on the sign does not change the trade name on the social-security writing. Even if the formation papers and the notification writing stand in the same folder, the two acts carry separate headings. The branch manager's signature circular does not fill the social-security subject line. If a name is on the circular and that name does not appear as a worker in the writing, it is not carried onto the worker line.
A residence card does not erase the social-security line
The worker's residence card is not the social-security notification writing. A stay permit appearing on the card does not erase the subject line. If there is no card, this text does not add a residence result to the social-security writing. A residence permit not being extended is a separate notice that goes to the worker. The reason for non-extension is not pasted in place of the employer's social-security line. The address on the card does not have to be the same as the workplace address in the writing. If the two addresses conflict, each stays on its own paper.
The end day of the residence card is not the day the social-security notification was made. The day is on the card's own line. If that day is not in the writing, the day is not added to the allegation. Loss of the card is not treated as having completed the notification. A work stamp in the worker's passport is not the social-security writing. The stamp does not show that the notification was made. The day on the stamp does not take the place of the allegation day in the writing. The permit document, the residence card, and the social-security writing may stand as three separate headings. Whichever is in hand is the one that is read. What is not in hand is not produced from the sentence of the other. How employment without insurance would be set up is not narrated in any of these three headings. If it is said that the worker's wage was paid in cash, that statement does not change the subject line of the social-security writing. A cash payment is not a result that the notification was made or was not made. If a slip is in hand, the slip does not take the place of the writing. The figure on the slip is not taken onto this page. If the slip's description does not say social security, the description is not read as a notification record. The employer does not treat the slip as the reason of the act line. If the reason is in the writing that was served, it is on that line. If the writing carries a workplace address and a worker's name on separate lines, the two are not read in place of each other. The address is not completed from a branch-formation petition. The worker is not added to this writing from another workplace's list. Even if the list and the writing were drawn up on the same day, the headings stay apart. One being missing does not fill the sentence of the other. A missing line is not closed by guesswork in this text.
Conclusion
The employer reads the subject line of the social-security allegation, the workplace trade name, and the worker's identity. The work-permit document and the residence card are separate. There is no premium figure and no arrangement of employment without insurance. Formation of a branch is not copied. The permit document sits in the frame named Law No. 6735 on International Labour Force. The general frame is on the international law page. A sample writing can be read separately through contact.