In short
The question of how a claim is asked from a company in liquidation is not being entered on the bankruptcy estate. The company may have entered liquidation by its own decision or for a reason in the statute. The creditor reads the liquidator and the notice. Proceedings opened against a trade name that has been struck off do not bring back distributed assets by themselves. There is no liquidation term in this text.
The liquidator and the notice
Liquidation is the act of the side that is closing the company. The question of the creditor outside is where to state the claim. The notice may show the place where claims will be notified. Before the notice is seen, the number of the old enforcement file is not treated as enough. Liquidation is not shortened as the creditor asking for bankruptcy. The creditor notifies the liquidator of the invoice and, if there is one, the file number. The notification is not a message sent to the former director. The liquidator's name is read from the trade-register notice. If the notice has no liquidator, the register entry is asked for again, and distributed assets do not come back by a message.
The trade name, service, and striking off
If the debtor line has the words "in liquidation", service goes to the liquidator. An envelope that went out to the former director's house is not treated as served on the company. The trade name on the invoice and the trade name that entered liquidation may mix, and the claim belongs to the company on the invoice. A notice written to the shareholders does not stand in for the company record. Striking off does not mean the debt passed to the shareholders. A distributed liquidation surplus is not built without the register and the liquidation balance sheet. This text sets no rate and writes no liquidation term. The former director's personal debt is not collection of the company's claim.
Neighbouring doors do not make liquidation into bankruptcy
The course of liquidation sits under liquidation of the company. If bankruptcy has been opened, the record sits under the bankruptcy estate. The door of the bankruptcy action is under the bankruptcy action. The trade name on the invoice, under the company on the invoice, and service at the address, under service on the company, are separate questions. These records do not write a liquidation term, and they do not put the notice in place of the bankruptcy list. Liquidation is not a copy of bankruptcy. The claim is not treated as having passed to the estate by itself.
How the notice is read
The liquidation notice, the register entry, and the invoice that shows the claim stand together. The three are not taken for a single petition. An Ankara lawyer does not put the Çankaya office in place of the liquidator's register address. The liquidator is read from the notice and the register. Service is not treated as made on the company because it went out to the former director's house. There is no liquidation term under this heading either, because a term is not invented, and a decision is not written before the notice is seen.
The record of what is asked is in the notice and the register
The place where the claim will be notified is the liquidator the liquidation notice shows and the entry on the trade register. A message sent to the former director does not stand in for this record. The invoice shows which trade name the debt belongs to, and the words "in liquidation" require service to go to the liquidator. An envelope that went out to the former director's house is not treated as served on the company. Striking off does not bring distributed assets back by itself, and it does not make the debt the shareholders' personal debt. A liquidation term is not written in this separation either. A rate is not written either, because sharing of the liquidation surplus is not built without the register and the balance sheet.
Being entered on the bankruptcy estate does not mean having been notified to the liquidator. The two doors are separate. If the petition is written without showing which trade name, which invoice, and which notice it relies on, a liquidator record is not treated as having been formed. The decision does not assume that the company is still represented at the old address before the notice is seen. A notice drawn on the shareholders is not a copy of the company register. Where the claim will be stated is not announced while the notification document, the invoice, and the register copy do not stand together. The address of the office in Çankaya cannot be put in place of the liquidator. If the name appearing on the trade register and the name on the notice differ, it is asked which record is current, and a notification made to the old address is not treated as enough. A notice written to the shareholders for distributed assets does not bring the company assets back by itself. In the notification, the invoice number and the trade name are written together. An incomplete notification does not mean the claim was accepted by itself. The liquidator's name is not guessed before a register copy is obtained, and a liquidation term is still not written.
Conclusion
In liquidation, the claim is read from the liquidator and the notice. The bankruptcy list and the former director's house do not stand in for this record. Striking off does not bring the assets back. A liquidation term is not written. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy page. The basis is the text of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102.