In short
If deportation and enforcement of a sentence exist at the same time, what is read first is the own file of the paper in hand. This article answers that separation. The enforcement writing looks at the judgment being carried out. The deportation decision is a separate administrative act built about the foreigner. One does not erase the other by itself. The objection petition is not copied here. Which institution will move first is not written from memory.
The enforcement paper is in its own file number
A paper relating to enforcement of a criminal sentence is a paper of the enforcement prosecutor's office or of the penal institution. If a file number, the subject of the judgment, and the type of the act are written on it, those lines are read. If there is no line, this page does not add a number or an institution name. A call paper does not describe from this text where the person will go. If there is a call, it is read from its own text.
The act written on the enforcement paper is not carried over as the ground of the deportation decision. A summary of the judgment is not pasted in place of the administrative decision. If one writing speaks of the other, that sentence is set side by side with the paper it speaks of. The mention is not treated as having closed the other file. If the other file's own papers are not there, the closing is not completed from this page.
Headings such as release, an open penal institution, or probation are read only if the enforcement paper carries that heading. This page does not list the conditions of those headings. While there is no condition, the person is not treated as taken into one of these regimes. A route of absconding, of abandoning the enforcement, or of not applying the judgment is not written.
The deportation decision is an administrative act
The deportation decision is an administrative act the migration administration built. The result of the decision, its ground, and the service record are in its own text. If there is no text, a decision is not assumed to exist. If there is a text, it is not placed inside the enforcement file by being reduced. If there are two file numbers, there are two files. A single folder at home does not make the numbers one number.
How an objection to the deportation decision is read is under objection to a deportation decision. The petition arrangement under that heading is not copied onto this page. Where an application in the enforcement file will go is read from the own line of the enforcement paper. If there is no line, an authority name and a figure of a period are not invented. It is not promised that the application will stop the enforcement or the deportation decision.
A writing of administrative detention may also be separate from both files. Detention is not the deportation decision itself. The enforcement paper is not a detention decision either. If three writings stand, three headings are read. One is not presented as the service of the other.
When one ends, the other does not close by itself
Service of the deportation decision does not drop the enforcement line. The enforcement beginning, or the enforcement paper being drawn up, does not leave the deportation decision invalid by itself. That the sentence was enforced does not mean the deportation decision was lifted. That the deportation was carried out does not mean the judgment is treated as enforced. Erasure or ending is read from there only if it appears in the relevant file's own writing. If it does not appear, it is not assumed to have ended.
A relative saying "one has ended" does not stand in for the file record. An officer's oral summary does not stand in for the writing either. If the summary and the paper conflict, the paper is kept. This page does not close the conflict in favour of one file.
This separation is not an account of how the sentence will be served. The type of institution, the remaining period, or a calculation of release is not built here. A figure of a period is not frozen. If the two files stand, both stand. One is not announced as closed before the other is read. There is also no telling of leaving the country as a route that drops the enforcement or the decision.
A wait is read only if it is in the paper's sentence
The question of which comes first is not answered with an order of institutions from memory. If the enforcement paper is in hand, that paper is read from its own file. If the deportation decision is in hand, that decision is read from its own file. If a paper writes in its own sentence that it is waiting because of the other act, the wait is read from that sentence. If there is no sentence, this text does not add a waiting period.
Priority is not built by which paper the person wanted to see first either. The two writings may have been served at the same time. The service records falling at the same time does not turn the acts into a single act. Each service record is tied to its own writing. If one of the records is missing, the missing record is not produced from the other's date.
A call of the enforcement prosecutor's office is not service of the deportation decision. Service by the migration administration does not stand in for the enforcement call either. If two separate envelopes came to the person, the two envelopes are kept. If one of the envelopes is lost, the lost one is not copied from the one that stands. Which authority wrote it is separated from the heading of the envelope and of the paper inside.
Residence and work do not close the two files
Non-extension of a residence permit and refusal of a work permit are neither the enforcement paper nor the deportation decision. These notices are not presented as a document that closes one of the two files. The residence or work papers may be standing in the folder. That they stand does not erase the enforcement line or the deportation text.
That the residence card is with the person does not mean the judgment was not enforced. A letter accepting the work permit does not drop the deportation decision. A letter of refusal does not open the enforcement file either. Each notice stays in its own act. If four papers stand at the same time, there are four headings. One does not complete the other's ground.
If the two files are with the same person, the contact page is for reading the papers together. Contact does not say which file will close first. Closing is looked for in the relevant writing's own sentence.
How the file numbers are separated
If the person received two writings, they separate the file number and the institution from the top of each writing. If the enforcement prosecutor's office or the penal institution writes, that writing is the enforcement file. If the migration administration or the governorship writes a deportation decision, that writing is the administrative file. If there is no number, a number is not invented. If there is no institution name, a name is not added. Being put in the same folder does not join the numbers. A single cover at home does not make the two acts one act.
If the enforcement writing has a sentence about a call, or about the judgment continuing, the sentence is in that writing. The call is not service of the deportation. If the deportation decision has a ground and a result, those are in the administrative text. The ground is not pasted onto the enforcement paper. If one speaks of the other, the mention is not the closing of the other file. If the other file's own papers are absent, the closing is not completed. Release or probation is read only if the enforcement paper carries that heading. This page does not list the conditions of those headings.
The wait is read where the sentence of waiting is written, on whichever paper it is. If there is no sentence, an order of institutions is not built from memory. A figure of a period is not added. If there is no writing that the sentence has ended, the enforcement is not treated as ended. If there is no writing that the deportation decision has fallen, the decision stands. A relative's word and an officer's summary do not stand in for the writing. If the summary and the paper conflict, the paper is kept.
The residence card and the work permit may be set beside these two numbers. They are a third and a fourth act. The card does not close the enforcement. Refusal or acceptance of work does not erase the deportation text. The objection petition is not copied on this page. An application in the enforcement file is read from the own line of the enforcement paper. If there is no line, an authority is not invented. The service envelopes are also matched with the number. Whichever writing an envelope carries, that envelope belongs to that file. If an envelope is lost, the lost one is not produced from the date of the envelope that stands.
A writing of administrative detention may be a third heading outside these two numbers. Detention is neither the enforcement call nor the deportation decision itself. If three writings stand, three headings are read. One is not presented as the service of the other.
There is no route of absconding, of abandoning the enforcement, or of leaving the country before the decision. If the two files stand, both stand. One is not announced as closed before the other is read.
Conclusion
The deportation decision and enforcement of the sentence are separate files. Whichever is in hand, that file is read from its own number. One does not erase the other by itself. A wait and an ending are taken from there only if they are in the paper's own sentence. The objection petition is not copied. Residence and work notices do not close these two files. The foreigners frame stands on the international-law frame page and under the name of the Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection.