In short
In a claim of harm after prostate surgery, the patient reads side by side the name of the procedure in the note and the complaint of function at the later examination. The matching is not a ruling that one gave rise to the other. There is no description with sexual content. The surgical technique is not recounted. An amount of money is not built. A percentage of disability is not written either. If there is no name of the procedure, the name is not completed. The complaint is not written backwards onto the note of the day of the operation.
Where the name of the procedure stands
The operation note writes the name of the procedure in its own words. The name is read. If there is no name, a name is not invented. If a word such as open or closed appears, the word is not a description of the technique. Which tissue was separated how, and which instrument was used in which order, is not taken into this text. The patient does not draw an order of the operation from the word. The order is not on this page.
The hour of the note and the hour of the discharge note are separate. If the discharge note does not carry the name of the procedure, the name is not produced from the discharge line. If the operation note carries it, the name is read from there. If the two papers use a different name, both stand. The patient does not choose a single name by erasing one. The chosen name is not built in this text either.
The discharge summary may not be the short form of the operation note. If the summary was silent and the note wrote a name, the silence does not erase the name. The patient asks for both. If one has not come, the name of what is missing is written. The missing part is not completed from the summary that came.
A pathology report is not the name of the procedure
If there is a pathology report, the report does not stand in for the operation note. The report may carry the name of the tissue that was removed. The name is not counted as the cause, by itself, of the later complaint. The two papers stand separately. One does not erase the date of the other. The result of the report is not classified on this page. If the class word is written in the report, it stands as it was written. If it is not written, a word is not produced. The patient does not carry the pathology sentence backwards as if it had been known on the day of the operation.
The later note in which the complaint was written
The later note may write, as a heading, a complaint such as holding urine, the urinary tract or sexual function. This text does not describe that complaint. The existence of the line is read without a description. If there is no line, it is not said that there was a loss of function. If there is a line, the line is not written backwards onto the note of the day of the operation. The content of the heading is not described. Holding urine is also read as a heading. It is not depicted.
The patient may set out when they noticed the complaint at home. The order does not erase the date of the hospital note. If the two dates conflict, the conflict is written. The conflict is not a ruling of fault by itself. If there is more than one follow-up note, the date of each is kept. An early follow-up does not treat the later complaint as absent. A late follow-up does not show that the early examination was never done. If there is no heading in the early note, the later heading is not written onto the early day.
Matching the two records
The matching is the name of the procedure and the sentence of the complaint standing in the same file. Their standing in the same file is not the ruling of the result. The ruling is not built in this text. The separation of a known result and a lack of care is in a complication. This page does not repeat that separation. The work that remains here is to bring the two records side by side. In the petition the patient asks first which note the name of the procedure appears in, then which follow-up the heading of the complaint appears in. A petition that does not ask turns into a general complaint about an operation.
Which result was written in the consent is looked for within informed consent. The result line on a prostate form may not be a copy of a general-surgery form. If loss of function does not appear on the line, it is not said that it appeared. If it appears, the word that appears is not turned into a percentage. There is no percentage. The hour of the signature of the consent is read apart from the hour of the operation. If there is no hour, it is not said that it was signed first. The signature does not fill an empty result line.
The notes to be brought
The patient asks for the operation note, the consent form, the discharge note and the examination note in which the later complaint of function appears. The request is in the patient file. If one part has come, what came is not written in the place of what has not come. The basis is that the record is open to the patient and that the account stays in writing, under the Patient Rights Regulation. This body does not set an article number.
An invoice may show the institution where the procedure was done. An invoice does not carry the complaint of function. If a board writing comes, the writing is not put in the place of the operation note. If the notes are in hand, the reading is assessed separately through contact. If an old photocopy and a new printout carry a different name, both are kept. The addition on the new printout is read with the date it was added. It is not written back onto the day of the operation.
The order of the follow-up dates
The patient writes the follow-ups after the day of the operation into a list. On the list, the date of each line and whether the heading of function appears on that date stand. If there is no heading, the box stays empty. The empty box is not filled with the heading of the later follow-up. If there is a heading at the early follow-up and later there is not, the early line is not erased. The list does not say how many days will be counted as fault. A number of days is not in this text. The list shows which heading stands on which paper.
A nurse's observation may carry the name of the catheter or of the dressing. This name is not a heading of loss of function. The patient does not translate the word of care in the observation as a heading of sexual function or of holding urine. A translation also gives rise to a description. A description is not on this page. The observation stays in its own word. It is placed side by side with the operation note. One is not written in the place of the other.
If the consent form recounts a general operation, this account does not carry the name of the prostate procedure by itself. The name of the procedure is looked for in the operation note, and the result word is looked for in the consent. If the two are on different papers, the patient does not melt the two in one paragraph. A paragraph that is melted hides which word was written on which day. If a board report carries a percentage, the percentage is not the subject of this page. The report is not put in the place of the operation note. Before the note stands, the result of the board is not counted as the ruling of the name of the procedure. The discharge summary may write a heading of what to watch for at home. If the heading carries the word urine or function, the word is read. It is not described. If there is no heading, loss of function is not treated as having been recounted at discharge. The summary does not stand in for the name of the procedure in the operation note. The patient adds the summary to the follow-up list as a separate day. The day of the summary does not have to be the same as the day of the operation. Even if they are the same day, the two papers are two lines. If a later urology note recommends another procedure, the recommendation is not the name of the first procedure. The recommendation is on its own date. The first name stays in the first note. The patient does not write the recommendation backwards as the result of the first day. If it is written, the matching turns two different days into a single sentence of fault. This page does not build that sentence. The matching is the name and the heading standing side by side. Their standing is not a ruling. The patient also looks at the count or the list of materials in the annex of the operation note. If the list carries the name of an instrument, the name is not a description of the technique. A description is not on this page. The list does not stand in for the name of the procedure. The name of the procedure is looked for at the start of the note or in the result sentence. If the list is empty, the gap is not filled with the name of a known operation. If the heading stands at the later follow-up and the name of the procedure in the note is empty, the heading does not produce a name. The two gaps are two deficiencies. The deficiencies are written side by side. Their being written is not the announcement of fault. The announcement is the work of the separation of a complication. This body does not build that announcement. The percentage in the board writing is not built either. If the percentage stands on the paper, the patient does not include the percentage in the matching of this page. The matching is the name and the heading. The patient does not change the word in the file when carrying the heading into a petition of complaint. The detail of the word is not recounted. The account changes neither the existence of the line nor its absence. If there is no line, absence is written. If there is a line, it stays as a heading. Its staying does not announce the result of the operation. The patient does not add detail while reading the heading. Added detail would be a description that is not in the file. A description is not in this text. The heading stays in the word it was written in.
Conclusion
In a claim after prostate surgery, the place that is read is the name of the procedure and the later complaint of function. The match is not an announcement of fault. A pathology report does not stand in for the name of the procedure. There is no technical step and no sexual description. The separation is left to the article on a complication. An amount of money and a percentage of disability are not written. The frame is on the health law page.