In short
When a penalty for an unauthorised worker is written to the employer, what is read is the addressee line of the sanction and whether the amount is in that writing. If the addressee is the employer, the administrative sanction was written to the employer. The charge directed at the worker is a separate paper. The amount is the writing in hand’s own figure. This text does not publish a tariff. There is no scheme of employing without authorisation.
To whom the sanction was served
The service annotation and the addressee line show to whom the writing went. If the title, the tax or register information, and the address stand on these lines, they are read from there. If the line shows a company or an employer title, the addressee is that title. If a branch, a workplace, or a head-office address is written separately from the title, the address is left on its own line as well. If the address is empty, a branch name is not added. The worker’s name can appear as the person who was found. This appearance does not mean the sanction was written to the worker. If a separate service was made on the worker, that service is read with its own annotation. The two annotations are two steps.
If the writing was served on the attorney, the attorney line is taken as the basis. If the power of attorney is not standing in the file, service on the attorney is not read as if it had been made on the employer. An oral notification is not put in place of the annotation. If there is no annotation, the period is not treated as having started. The record on the annotation is not changed for the record of another file. If there is an annotation that the service was returned, the return does not mean the writing reached. If the ground of the return is written on the annotation, it is read from there. If it is not written, the ground is not completed.
The competent authority is read from the letterhead of the writing. If there is no letterhead, an authority is not chosen. If the unit that made the inspection and the unit that wrote the sanction do not stand in the same sentence, the two lines are kept separate. One does not take the place of the other’s signature. If the signature or approval line is empty, the gap is not filled.
The worker’s name line is not the addressee
The finding line shows, as far as it writes, which foreigner worked at which workplace and on which date. This line is not the whole of the charge of unauthorised work against the worker. If the worker has no paper of the worker’s own, a result of removal, residence, or a permit belonging to the worker is not built from the employer’s writing. If a permit number appears in the writing, the number is read as it is in the writing. If there is no number, one is not added. If the permit document is standing in the file, the employer title on the document and the title on the sanction writing are placed side by side. A failure to overlap is left as two titles. An overlap does not make the amount rightful or wrongful of its own accord either.
A removal decision is not an annex of this sanction. If there is a decision, it is read from the heading an objection to a removal decision. A residence step does not say the amount of the sanction either. A residence writing is the subject of the heading a residence permit not being extended. If there is no sentence of leaving the country in the sanction writing, a result of departure is not built from this article. The person on the finding line is not written of its own accord as the addressee of the removal decision.
The amount is only the writing’s own figure
If there is an amount in the sanction writing, the amount that is read is that one. If there is no amount, this text does not produce a lira, a multiple, or an increase. A tariff, a rate of reduction, and a calculation of a repeated penalty are not here. The figure in the writing is not converted to the tariff of another period. A new multiplication is not built from the number of workers, the number of visits, or the number of minutes. If the calculation does not stand in a finished state on the writing’s own line, it is not completed. If there is a sentence of a reduction or an increase beside the figure, the sentence is read as it is in the writing. While there is no sentence, a rate is not added.
A payment receipt shows that the amount changed only if the receipt’s own line says so. If there is no receipt, the amount is not treated as paid. If the title on the receipt and the sanction title differ, the difference is not closed. Instalments, a deferral, or a restructuring are not opened by this text if they do not stand as a sentence in the writing. If they stand in the writing, the route is read from the sentence in the writing. This page does not put a payment calendar.
A refusal of an application is not this sanction. The refusal writing stays under refusal of a work permit. The refusal does not take the place of the administrative sanction written to the employer. That the permit application was not accepted does not give birth to the penalty figure either. The document of a permit that was accepted does not erase the amount in the sanction writing either. The document is read separately beside the amount.
There is no scheme of employing without authorisation
Employing a worker without a permit, hiding the record, writing the worker under another title, and a route of shifting the penalty onto another person are not in this article. Advice to split the inspection day, or to leave the minute incomplete, is not here either. The text tells how to read the addressee and the lines of the sanction that was served. The employer is the administrative addressee. The worker is the person whose name appears on the finding line, or who is charged separately. The two capacities are not joined on the same paper. That the employer says the employer does not know the person on the finding line does not erase the line. The saying is read from that sentence only if it has passed into the writing.
If the heading of the writing says administrative fine, the heading is read from there. If the heading says another step, the step is not changed for the name in this text. A result is not promised in the direction that the objection will be accepted. That the sanction will be lifted is not promised either. The reading is limited to what the paper wrote.
More than one name does not build a multiplication
If the minute or the sanction writing counts more than one foreigner, each name is left on its own line. One name’s permit document does not cover the other name on the list. The length of the list is not a multiplier in this text. If the writing shows a separate amount per person, the amount is read from that line. If it does not show one, an amount is not produced from the number of persons. If the same person’s name appears on two lines, the repetition is left as it is in the writing. The repetition is not completed as a new penalty.
If a subcontractor, the principal employer, or the owner of the workplace appears in the same writing, each title is on its own line. If the writing does not show one of them as the addressee, the addressee capacity is not transferred from the other. If there is no sentence of transfer, the penalty is not shifted onto a person who is remembered. The contract does not take the place of the addressee line of the sanction writing. The title that appears in the contract is read side by side only if it also appears in the sanction writing.
To which step the objection is written
The objection or the action is directed at the sanction writing that was served. The route and the period are read from there as they stand on the writing. A day count is not in this text. The petition is tied to the number of this writing, not to another step of the worker. If the number cannot be read, that it cannot be read is stated. A missing number is not taken from a similar file. The annex of the petition is the writing itself. If there is no annex, the petition has to show in its own sentence which step it is against. If the sentence does not carry the number of the writing either, the gap is not hidden.
A petition written on the worker’s separate charge paper is not the petition of the employer sanction. If there are two petitions, two file numbers are looked for. If the number is single, there is a single step. The employer is not treated as having objected in the worker’s name. The worker is not treated as having lifted the employer’s sanction with the worker’s own petition either. The party is whoever is written in the petition.
If the sanction writing is standing, the addressee line can be read from the file through contact. The frame is on the international law page. The basis is the text of the International Labour Force Law No. 6735. The frame of residence and removal steps is in the text of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458. If there is no article number in the writing, a number is not added. An article that appears in the writing is left with the sentence in the writing.
If an inspection minute stands in the annex of the sanction writing, the minute does not change the addressee line of the sanction. If the workplace address in the minute and the address in the writing differ, the difference is left as two lines. If the minute carries the worker’s account, the account is the sentence of the minute. The account is not built again as the calculation of the amount. If the worker says the wage was paid or was not paid, this sentence does not erase or increase the sanction figure. The wage record is in a separate document. This page does not paste the two records onto a single result.
If the writing refers to an earlier sanction, the reference is as far as the number and the sentence in the writing. If the earlier writing is not in the file, the earlier amount is not completed from this text. The reference is not read as a repeated multiplier. The multiplier is read from that line only if the sanction writing shows a finished calculation on its own line. If it does not show one, a calculation is not built. The service annotation of the old writing does not start the period of the new writing. A signature circular in the annex of the petition does not change the addressee title either. The title is in the sanction writing. The service is whoever it was left with on the annotation.
Conclusion
If the administrative sanction was written to the employer on the addressee line, it is the employer’s paper. The worker’s name line does not change this addressee capacity. The amount is only the writing’s own figure. More than one name does not build a multiplication. A scheme of employing without authorisation, and a tariff, are not in this text.