In short
An objection to an administrative fine written to a foreigner is read to the authority written on the penalty paper. This article answers that line. How the entry date and the end of the visa are read in a visa breach is not rebuilt here. A figure is not given for the period. If the paper does not carry the name of an authority, the place is not completed from someone else’s fine, or from a word at the counter. Not paying is not a route of application either.
The name of the authority is on the penalty paper
The place that is read is the line on the penalty paper that says where the objection or the application is to be made. If the line carries the name of a court, a unit, or a board, the name is taken from there. This text does not put a building learned by heart in place of that name. If the paper writes the name of an Act, the name of the Act is read together with the same line as well. The name of the Act does not erase the authority line. The authority line is not invented in place of the name of the Act.
If the line is cut off on a photocopy, the cut place is not filled in. If the bottom of the paper is missing, the authority is treated as absent, and it is not invented. Asking for a full copy is not this page giving a description of a building. The authority is not announced before the full copy arrives.
The authority line of a fine written to another foreigner is not pasted onto this paper. Even if the two fines were imposed at the same time, each paper carries its own line. If one rests on a visa breach and the other on another cause, the causes do not get mixed either. The ground of each fine is in its own text.
On service made on an attorney, the authority is looked for on the copy that was served. The service note is not itself the name of the authority. The note and the line are left side by side. One does not erase the other. The district where the attorney’s office is does not lock the authority to that district of its own accord. The competent place is the name the paper writes.
Whichever copy the service belongs to is the one that is read
The period of the objection is not frozen on this page. If the paper writes a period, the period is in that writing, and the figure is not carried here. If the paper does not write a period, an addition is not made. A draft that was not served is not treated as having opened the period. Whichever copy the service record belongs to, that copy’s line is read. If the draft and the copy that was served conflict, the copy that was served is kept. The conflict is not closed in this text by choosing an authority.
Whether the period stops running is not promised either. Giving the application paper does not mean collection has stopped of its own accord. A stay is read from there only if it appears in the writing in hand, or in a later writing of the authority. This text does not build a result of a stay. It is not said that the application will be accepted either. Before the authority’s decision comes out, it is not announced that the fine has lifted.
The application petition shows which penalty paper it is against, by that paper’s date and by its number if there is one. If the number is not on the paper, the absence is not invented by the petition. The petition cannot go of its own accord to a place that is not written on the authority line. Where it is to be given is the name on the line. If there is no name, the petition does not invent an address.
Whether service was made on the person or on the attorney is read from the service annotation. If there is no annotation, service is not treated as having happened. If the postal envelope is standing, the envelope is kept together with the annotation. An oral note on the envelope does not take the place of the annotation.
A payment receipt is not an application
A payment receipt and an objection application are separate papers. The receipt does not show of its own accord that the application was made. The application paper does not change the figure on the receipt either. A figure is not in this text. Not paying is not told as the route of objection. A method of delaying the fine, of hiding it, or of leaving it in someone else’s name is not written.
If a partial payment was made, the receipt is the record of the part that was paid. If the remaining part appears separately on the penalty paper or in the collection writing, it is read from there. If it does not appear, the remaining amount is not calculated from this page. An amount is not written at all. The receipt does not change the authority line either.
Giving up the objection is a separate writing. Giving up is not treated as completed by an oral sentence. If there is a written giving up, that text is read. Giving up does not mean the payment was made. Payment is not giving up either. If the two steps have got mixed, each stays in its own paper.
The visa date is not calculated under this heading
Which date is read in a fine for a visa breach is the subject of the entry line and the visa-end line. That calculation is not repeated in this article. The authority line is not put in place of the date line. The date line does not choose the authority either. If there are two lines on the same paper, there are two questions. One is not tied to the other by heart.
The date of a fine imposed for a residence breach is not opened here either. A residence permit not being extended is a separate notification. The place of objection to the extension-refusal writing is on that writing’s own line. The authority on the fine paper does not stick of its own accord to the extension refusal.
Refusal of a work permit is a separate refusal writing. The place of application of the refusal writing is not copied onto the authority line on the fine paper. Each service is read from its own line. Even if the three writings arrived at the same time, there can be three authorities. If the same authority name is written on all three, this does not make the three steps one step. Each application shows its own paper.
The removal route is not copied
An objection to a removal decision is not the authority line of the fine paper. A removal decision is a separate step, and the reading that goes to the administrative court is under that heading. The place to go against the fine is not copied from the objection arrangement of the removal decision. Even if the two steps came in the same envelope, each keeps its own line. The envelope being one does not join the authority.
If the court of the removal decision is not written on the authority line of the fine, that court is not added to this fine. The authority of the fine cannot be used as the heading of the removal petition. If two applications are to be made, each is tied to its own paper. One is not left incomplete as an annex of the other.
A record of an entry ban does not choose the place of objection to the fine either. If the ban is written separately, it is read from its own text. An objection to the fine does not lift the ban of its own accord. Lifting is seen from there only if it appears in a writing about that.
If the authority line is to be read with the fine in hand, it is written through contact. Contact does not produce the name of a court that is not on the paper. What is read is the line on the copy that was served.
Which paper the petition is tied to
The objection petition goes to the place on the authority line of the penalty paper. If the line does not write a name, the petition does not choose a building. The petition shows which fine it is against, by the paper’s own date and by its number if there is one. If there is no number, a number is not produced. The summary of the ground stays tied to the act line on the penalty paper. The calculation of the visa date is not rebuilt inside this petition. That calculation is the subject of the entry and end lines, and it is a separate article.
The copy of the fine that was served is kept together with the petition. If there is no copy, the target of the application stays uncertain as well. If a receipt was added, the receipt does not show that the application was made. The receipt is the record of the payment. Not paying is not written in place of the petition. If a period is written on the paper, the petition is read according to that writing. The figure is not taken onto this page. If there is no service annotation, the period is not treated as having begun. If the draft and the copy that was served conflict, the copy that was served is kept.
If the same person has an extension refusal, a work-permit refusal, and a removal decision, each goes to its own authority with its own paper. The authority line of the fine is not copied onto the other three. The route of the others is not pasted onto the fine either. Even if four applications are needed, the four headings stand apart. Putting them in one envelope and making a single petition does not join the authorities. If the administrative-court route of the removal decision is not written on the fine line, it is not added to this fine.
The writing that comes after the application is read as to whatever it says about acceptance, refusal, or the state of collection. If there is no writing, a result is not promised. If a stay decision was not written separately, collection is not treated as having stopped of its own accord. On service that went out to the attorney, the petition takes as its basis the authority line of the copy served on the attorney. The attorney’s address does not change the authority. If the two copies conflict, whichever copy the service annotation belongs to, that copy is put forward.
Conclusion
The place of an objection to an administrative fine written to a foreigner is the authority written on the penalty paper. A draft that was not served does not open the period. The date calculation of a visa breach, and a period figure, are not on this page. Not paying is not built as a route of application. The route of a removal decision is not copied onto this paper. The frame is in the international law practice area and in the text of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458.