In short
A refusal of entry at the airport is the foreigner not being admitted to the country. This record at the gate is read separately from a deportation decision built about a person who entered the country. The place that is read is the minutes kept at the gate. If there are no minutes, a result is not built from here either. This article does not recount making a change on the document.
Non-admission at the gate
The border gate is the place where it is looked at whether the person will be taken into the country. The control at the airport is also one of these gates. The control may not admit the person to the country. A person who was not admitted is not counted in the same act as a person who entered and about whom a removal decision was later built. If the record writes that he was not admitted, the act is the refusal of entry at the gate. If the record carries another heading, the heading is not changed because of the airport's name.
The person being present during the control, or in the connection area, does not mean he was admitted to the country. Admission is read from there, if it is written separately in the minutes. If it is not written, this text does not produce a result of entry. A refusal of entry at a land or sea gate is also read with the same separation. The name of the gate does not change the kind of the act on its own. The kind is in the heading of the minutes. The airport's name appearing does not make every record a refusal of entry. A record belonging to a transfer passenger is not the minutes of a passenger who landed. Each person is separated from his own line.
Flight information, a ticket, or a baggage label does not stand in for the minutes. These papers may show that the journey exists. Non-admission is read only if it is written in the minutes. An airline officer's word is not put in the place of the administrative record. If the word passed onto the minutes, the sentence that passed is read together with the minutes. If it did not pass, the word is not a result sentence.
The lines looked for in the minutes
The place, the time, and the result of the act are looked for in the minutes. If the result is non-admission, the reasoning line is read separately. The reasoning may be writing the state of the document, or a condition of admission the statute looks for. Which condition was written comes out of the minutes. If the condition is not written, this article does not complete a reasoning. The officer's oral explanation does not stand in for the line of the minutes. If the explanation passed onto the minutes, the sentence that passed is read.
If there is a note relating to the carrier in the minutes, the note is read from that line. If there is no note, how the person will travel is not described here. The order of the journey is not in this text. The reading stays in the sentences of the record that was kept. If more than one foreigner appears in the minutes, each person is separated from his own line. The result of the person beside him is not made this person's result. If the name line is written differently in the minutes, it is put side by side with the name in the document. The difference is not closed on this page. The difference does not build a new reasoning sentence either.
The hour and the place stay in the form in which they were written, if they are written in the minutes. This article does not produce that hour or that place. If the signature or initial line is blank, the gap does not of itself say that the act did not happen. The gap does not mean the text was completed either. A definite gate result is not built with incomplete minutes. If the minutes are more than one page, each page is left in its own place. A missing page is not filled from the sentences in hand. Before the full minutes are seen, the reasoning is not treated as completed.
If the minutes were drawn up in more than one language, the sentence in each language is left in its own place. If a translation note stands, the note is read together with the original line. If there is no note, an oral translation is not counted as the reasoning line. If the result sentence in the two languages is different, both stand. This page does not choose one language and erase the other. If the name of the airport is written in the minutes, the name stays in the form in which it was written. The name does not change the kind of the act. The kind is on the result line. If there is a second set of minutes belonging to the same passenger, each set of minutes is read from its own hour. One does not take over the other's reasoning.
The decision of a person who was taken inside
The paper of a person who was admitted to the country and about whom a deportation decision was later built is not the gate minutes. The heading, the reasoning, and the service of that decision are separate. Having been refused entry once at the gate does not give rise of itself to the decision built after he later entered the country. In the other direction, the deportation decision is not put in the place of the earlier gate minutes either. If there are two records, there are two acts. One does not take over the other's date. The hour in the gate minutes is not the service record of the deportation decision.
The objection petition is read in a separate article for the deportation decision: an objection to a deportation decision. This page does not build that petition. An entry ban may also be an act different from the gate minutes. If there is a ban decision, the separation stands in the article an entry-ban decision. The gate minutes are not read as the period line of the ban. If there is no operative part called a ban in the minutes, the ban is not added from this page. If the minutes refer to a ban, the reference is as much as it is written in the minutes. The reference does not stand in for the operative part of the ban.
If the person was kept waiting at the gate and was then taken inside, the record relating to each of the two states is looked for separately. If only the waiting is recounted and there are no minutes, a result of non-admission is not built. If there is a writing relating to being taken inside, that writing is read from its own sentence. If the two writings conflict, both are left. The conflict is not closed in this text by choosing one writing.
The passport and visa line
The minutes may write for which reason the passport, or the visa record, was not seen as sufficient. The reason that was written is read. Whether the reason appears the same in the minutes and in the document is understood when the two texts are put side by side. This putting side by side does not recount drawing the document up again. What is read is the line that passed onto the minutes at the moment of the control. If the expression on the visa sticker and the expression in the minutes are different, the difference is not closed. The difference is not used to produce a reasoning that was not written in the minutes either.
The result of a visa application and non-admission at the gate may not be the same sentence. The visa may be an application that ended separately before entry. The gate minutes are the record at the moment of the control. One does not carry the other's reasoning of itself. If both are in the file, both are read from their own text. A refusal-of-entry decision is not assumed to exist, because the visa page is missing, while there are no minutes. If the minutes refer to the visa, the reference sentence is taken as the basis. If there is no reference, the visa writing does not build the gate result.
The identity line in the passport and the identity line in the minutes are read separately. If the nationality, the birth record, or the document number was written differently, each is on its own paper. This page does not announce which line is correct. Correctness is seen from that basis sentence, when the two texts stand and the minutes show a basis. If there is no basis, the identity difference is not made the reasoning of the refusal of entry.
Interference with the document is outside this subject
This article does not recount the changing of the passport, the visa, or another paper. The drawing up again of the page, the record, or the photograph is not here. The reading is limited to the line that passed onto the minutes at the moment of the control and to the state of the document at that moment. A new document the person obtained later does not erase the sentence of the old minutes of itself. If the new document is mentioned in the minutes, the sentence that is mentioned is read. If it is not mentioned, the new document is not treated as having changed the gate result.
If it is written in the minutes that the document was seen as insufficient, the insufficiency is the sentence in which it was written. If the sentence says which aspect of the document it mentions, that aspect is read. If it does not say it, this text does not choose an aspect. The choice does not include building a record that is not in the minutes either. The record is the sentence that stands in the minutes. If there is no sentence, the state of the document is not announced from here. A word said to the officer is not counted as the new state of the document if it did not pass onto the minutes.
Permit writings are not the gate record
A refusal relating to a residence or work permit is not the minutes of the refusal of entry at the gate. The permit writing does not stick of itself as the reasoning of not being admitted to the country. If the minutes refer to the permit writing, the reference is as much as it is written in the minutes. If there is no reference, the two acts stay separate. A residence permit not being extended and a refusal of a work permit are read from their own notices. The end date of the permit card is not the time line of the gate minutes. The card being in hand does not erase the sentence of non-admission in the minutes. If the minutes mention the card, the sentence that is mentioned is the basis.
The general frame is on the international law page. The statute text stands as the Law on Foreigners and International Protection numbered 6458. Without a copy of the minutes, what the result at the gate was cannot be said. When the copy stands, what is read is the place, the time, the result, and the reasoning line. This page does not dress every gate record in the same result.
Conclusion
A refusal of entry at the airport is the record of not being admitted to the country. It is read separately from the deportation decision of a person who entered the country. The basis is the line of the minutes. The passport and the visa are read side by side with the minutes. A change on the document is not recounted in this article. The objection petition is not copied here either.