In short
A decision removing citizenship is not a refusal of an application. Removal is a transaction other than citizenship never having been given. There is a citizenship record, or an acquisition transaction, that was entered earlier. A refusal notifies that the request was not accepted, and it does not make the person a citizen with that application. What is read in removal is the ground of the transaction. If a year is not written in the decision, it is not added.
Removal is not the name of a refusal letter
A refusal is the negative result of an application that was made. Removal is a later transaction built about a person who appears a citizen, or who appears to have acquired citizenship. The two papers being on the same person does not make them a single decision. A refusal letter is not put in place of the ground of removal. The removal writing is not treated as having refused an application that was never opened either. While there is no application at all, a refusal form is not produced from the removal writing in hand.
The content of a refusal decision is in the writing on refusal of a citizenship application. This page does not copy that content. An amount, a country list, and the refusal period stay there. The ground in the removal writing is not carried from memory onto a refusal form. A missing-document sentence in the refusal letter is not made the ground of removal if it is not in the removal writing. If the numbers of the two writings differ, there are two transactions. If the number has joined on the same line, the joining is as much as the sentence in the writing.
An extract in which the person appears a citizen in the civil-register box can belong to the time before the removal writing. The extract does not take the transaction back by itself. If the box has changed in the extract after the transaction, the change is on that extract's own line. If there is no extract, the box is not guessed from the result of the removal writing. If the writing does not say how the box will change, that saying is not added.
The ground carries the transaction's own name
In the writing that was served, the name of the transaction can appear as removal, loss, cancellation, or leaving. Whichever name is written is the name that is read. If the name is not written, the operative sentence is looked at. It is separated from there whether the sentence ends the person's existing record, or turns a request back. While there is no sentence, a name is not invented. The word removal in spoken language does not take the place of the name in the writing.
The ground is looked for inside the same writing. A list of grounds is not frozen in this text. If the writing speaks of the truth of a statement, of a document, or of another reason, the reason is read from those sentences. An oral summary does not take the place of the ground. If the writing says whether the record was entered by birth or later, it is read from there. If it does not, this text does not add the path of acquisition. The conditions of the path of acquisition are not copied as the conditions of the refusal letter.
If the writing refers to another person's transaction, the reference is as much as the name and the number in the writing. The spouse's or the child's name can appear in the ground. The appearance does not create a separate removal decision belonging to those persons. If there is a separate decision, a separate service is looked for. If there is no service, the result is not spread to everyone in the family. The child's box is not erased by itself from the parent's writing.
Permission to leave is not mixed with a blue card
Leaving citizenship of one's own will and with permission is not the administration's removal decision. If the leaving document shows the permission given to the person's application, it shows that much. The removal writing is the administration's later transaction. The two standing in the same folder does not make them a single will. If the person did not ask to leave, that they did not ask is read only if there is no such application in the file, or if the writing says this. Whether there is an application comes from the paper. An application is not erased from an account.
A blue card drawn up after permission to leave is not the removal writing itself. What the card is stands under the blue card. This page does not rewrite the card's list of rights. Producing the card does not close the ground of removal, and it does not bring back from this text a status that was lost. If the removal writing says a blue card will not be given, what is said is that sentence. If it does not say it, a card result is not built from this writing.
If the leaving document and the removal writing stand in the same folder, each is read from its own date and its own ground. One does not carry the other's year. If the date line is blank, a year is not added. The printing date of the card is not the date of the removal decision. The two dates are left side by side.
If the decision has no year, it is not written
In some transactions the statute can provide a period. The period is read only if it appears in the decision that was served, or in the writing the decision was based on. If it does not appear, this text does not add a year or a day. The memorised year of an old announcement is not put in place of the decision in hand. If there is no service annotation, the period is not treated as having started either. The record in the annotation is not copied from another citizenship file's record.
If the decision writes on which date a statement was given, the date is the decision's sentence. If there is no date, the time of the statement is not completed. If the statement itself does not stand in the file, the text of the statement is not rewritten from the decision's summary. The summary is the decision's ground paragraph. If there is no ground paragraph, there is no summary either. This page does not freeze the ground as a list.
The path of objection or action is read from there as the decision shows it. If the path line is blank, a path is not chosen. The petition is tied to the number of the decision. If the number cannot be read, it is written that it could not be read. A missing number is not taken from a similar decision. A result is not promised in the direction that the transaction will be lifted.
The family register is not the ground of removal
The marriage line on the family register is not the ground of removal. The meaning of that line is in the writing on the civil-register record of a marriage with a foreigner. The marriage standing, or being erased, does not mean citizenship ended by removal. If the removal writing does not speak of the marriage, the marriage is not added to the ground. If it does speak of it, the speech is limited to the sentence in the writing. The sentence is not a description of building a sham marriage. The path of building is not in this text.
The residence card ending is not a removal decision either. Non-extension of the card is read from a separate notification. The card date is not stuck onto the ground of removal. If the person was the subject of a residence transaction in foreigner status after the removal writing, that transaction is in its own writing. The removal decision is not treated as having printed a residence card by itself. If there is no card, one does not say there is a card.
A result is not built without a service annotation
If the decision was served on the person or on the representative, the annotation is taken as the basis. If the power of attorney does not stand in the file, service on the representative is not widened as a result made on the person. An announcement or a notice is not counted as service if the decision does not write it as the path of service. If it does write it, the sentence in the writing is read. This text does not put an announcement period. If the annotation and the decision date differ, each date is on its own line. One is not copied in the other's place.
The writing that went to the civil-registry directorate and the writing that went to the person can be separate. The directorate's writing does not take the place of the decision in the person's hand. If the copy that went to the person is missing, a petition period is not started from the directorate's writing. If the grounds of the two copies differ, the difference is not closed. The difference is read by separating which copy carries which sentence.
The frame is on the international law page. The basis is the text of the Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901. A result is not built before the writing is seen. If an article number is not in the decision, it is not added. An article that appears in the decision is left with its sentence in the decision. The contact page is open for reading the decision together.
If a civil-register extract stands in the annex of the decision, the extract does not rewrite the ground of the decision. The citizenship box in the extract can show the record before the date of the decision. Which date belongs to which paper is separated. The extract is not the service annotation of the decision. The annotation is looked for on the decision. If the box is empty in the extract, the gap is not filled from the decision sentence and a new status is not declared.
The identity card the person received earlier does not take the removal writing back by itself. The card standing with the person does not mean the transaction was not served either. Service is read from the annotation. If the card's serial number does not appear in the decision, a number is not added. If it appears, the number stays as it is in the writing. The number is not put in place of the list of grounds.
If there are separate decisions belonging to family members, each decision is read with its own number. The ground in one decision is not carried onto the other. If the child's record is mentioned in the writing, the mention is not a result that the child's box was erased. Erasure is read from there if it appears in the child's own writing or in the civil-register extract. If it does not appear, this text does not erase a box.
Conclusion
Removal is a decision other than citizenship never having been given. The ground of the transaction is read from the writing that was served. Permission to leave and a blue card do not take the place of this ground. If a year is not in the decision, it is not written. A refusal letter is not a copy of this ground. If there is no annotation, a result is not built.