In short
The question of how a suspect's, a witness's and a victim's statement is separated says that three separate sets of rights are not looked for in the same session. The capacity is read from the summons. There is no prison term in this article. There is no article number either. The wrong capacity has the wrong right used. The capacity is not treated as built before the record is read.
If the summons paper writes one capacity and the record writes another, the two are not melted in the same sentence. The difference that is not melted shows with which right the person spoke. If the right is not on the paper, it is left as absent. The gap that is left is not filled with a prison term. A gap that is not filled is not written as a period in the petition either.
The suspect's set of rights
The suspect speaks of the charge and of the right to silence. Defence counsel comes onto the agenda in this session. Silence is not a copy of the witness's duty to tell it correctly. The silence record tells the suspect's side. A sentence of silence is not pasted onto the witness record by itself. A pasted sentence, if it is not in the record, is treated as absent.
The general tempo of a statement at the public prosecutor's office sits in the statement at the prosecutor's office record. The suspect does not carry the same duty as the person who tells what they saw of the event. A duty that is not carried is also read from the heading of the record. If the heading says suspect, the witness's oath is not the subject of this page. If the heading is silent, the silence is not completed as the capacity of a witness.
The witness's duty
The witness tells what they saw or what they know. "I heard" and "I saw" are not the same sentence. If a guess is passed off as eyewitness, a contradiction is born in a later session. The contradiction is read from two records. While there is a single record, a contradiction is not invented. The witness at the police record tells the face at the law-enforcement unit. The law-enforcement record does not stand in for the prosecutor's record.
The risk of false testimony is debated separately. The debate does not write a prison term into this text. If the term is in the judgment, it is read from the judgment. While there is no judgment, a term is not spoken. A term that is not spoken does not change the capacity on the summons either. The capacity is still in the document. If the document says witness, the suspect's set of rights is not carried into this session.
The victim's account
The victim tells the harm and the event. This account is not the suspect's defence. The will to complain may be a separate act. If the act does not appear in the record, it is left as not appearing. A will that was left is not treated as having existed afterwards. A will that is not treated as existing does not produce a prison term either.
The victim may also be heard like a witness in the same file. Two capacities want two records. If a single record does not carry both capacities, it is said that it does not carry them. A place where it is not said that it does not carry them is not written in the petition as two capacities. A capacity that is not written is completed from the summons. If the summons is silent too, the silence is not filled.
The capacity on the summons
The summons article tells the frame of the invitation. If the invitation has a capacity line, that line is what counts. If there is no line, the papers are asked for with the file number and the authority. The capacity is not chosen before the papers that were asked for arrive. A capacity that is not chosen is not read as if it had been written in advance on the statement record.
The service annotation may show the day the summons arrived. If there is no annotation, a day is not invented. The day is not written in place of a prison term either. If the decision changed the capacity afterwards, the change is in the text of the decision. While there is no text, the first summons is not a conviction document. A summons that is not a document does not carry an amount of punishment either.
If in the same event one person is a suspect, one a witness, and one a victim, the three records are not put in place of one another. A record that is not put there is not treated as having carried the other's sentence by itself. Carrying it mixes the capacity. A mixed capacity does not produce a prison term either. A term that is not produced does not stand in for the line on the summons. The line shows with which right the person sat. A paper that does not show this is not read as if it had been completed afterwards. A completion that is not read does not stand as an article number in the petition either. There is no number in this article, and it is not added to the margin of the record. A missing page is asked for separately.
Where the capacity is read from
A capacity that is not written on the summons is not added to the record, and a prison term is not written. The office being in Çankaya does not change the prosecutor's office where the statement was taken. This is read from the summons. The capacity is not treated as built while the summons, the record, and any correction annotation do not stand side by side.
Conclusion
If the capacity is read wrongly, the wrong right is used. A prison term and an article number are not frozen in this separation. The frame is on the criminal law page. The basis is the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.