In short
The right to silence at a statement to the prosecutor is that the suspect cannot be forced to make a statement against themselves, and staying silent is not by itself a conviction. Not speaking is used for a statement about the charge. Procedural questions, such as identity, may not be a word-for-word copy of that sentence. No prison term is stated in this text. The record shows whether the silence was entered.
The prosecutor's session is a record separate from the statement at the police. The two records may stand side by side. One is not read so that it passes by itself into the other. The decision separates at which authority the person stayed silent. A strategy is not spoken before the document is seen. A petition does not add a silence that is not on the record.
The charge and the identity question
The general frame of a statement at the prosecutor's office sits under statement at the prosecutor's office. The general account of the time before a statement sits under before giving a statement. This text separates how silence at the prosecutor's session enters the record. Silence or speaking is not treated as chosen before the charge is read. If there is no charge document, a charge is not invented.
Identity, address, and similar procedural questions may stand apart from the account of the event. A person may state their identity and stay silent on the charge. That separation should appear on the record. If it does not appear, the petition does not write the separation as if it had happened. If the application is for correction of the record, it is tied to the line that was written wrongly. If the line is correct, a result called a correction is not built. A prison term is not written into this separation either.
The silence line on the record
If silence was used, it is entered on the record. A note that no answer was given should show on which question it stands. If it was written as if the whole session was silence, and there is a sentence that was spoken, that sentence is looked for separately. If there is no sentence that was spoken, that absence is stated. The record is read before it is signed. A record that was not read does not by itself finish as the document on which the silence was entered.
A signature does not by itself prove in every file that the record was read. If there is a note of objection beside the signature, that note is also read. If there is no note, an objection is not written as if it were there. The document shows whose signature it is. The petition does not build the note as if it had been written on top of the record.
Partial silence is an answer to some questions and silence on others. Which question was answered should stand line by line. A mixed line is not told in the petition as if it had been cleaned. The decision takes the state on the record as the basis. Service may also show separately when the record reached the person. If receipt is not written, a date is not invented. A prison term is not written as the counterpart of silence.
Counsel and a conscious choice
Counsel may explain what a decision to stay silent means. The explanation is not making a statement in the person's place. Counsel's place at the prosecutor's statement sits under counsel at the prosecutor's office. In a statement taken without counsel, whether this right was reminded is read from the record. If the reminder line is absent, it is not written as if it were there.
A person may stay silent at one point in the session and then choose to speak. The order of the choice stands on the record. If the order is broken, it is read in its broken state. The petition does not tidy the order. The document may also show whether counsel was in the room. If it is not written that they were absent, absence is not invented. A prison term is not tied to this choice.
The police session is a different authority
Silence at the police sits under not giving a statement at the police. The general frame of rights in custody sits under rights in custody. The prosecutor's record is not read by itself as a continuation of the police record. If the two documents have conflicting sentences, the conflict is written. The conflict does not delete one of them. The decision separates which sentence was made at which authority.
The silence line is not built so that it passes by itself into a sentence of conviction. Other evidence in the file is not put in place of the silence, and the silence is not put in place of the evidence. If the application is an allegation that the statement was taken unlawfully, it is tied to the document of that allegation. Without the document, a finding of unlawfulness is not written. There is no prison term at this authority either. An article number is not added.
What is separated in silence before the prosecutor
Silence is not a sentence of conviction, and it is read from the line on the record. That the office is in Çankaya does not change the authority of the prosecutor's office where the statement was taken. That is read from the document. A prison term is not written. The police session is not put in place of this statement.
Conclusion
Silence at a statement to the prosecutor means a person cannot be forced to make a statement against themselves, and it is not by itself a conviction. A prison term is not written. An outcome is not spoken without the record showing on which question the person stayed silent. The police record is not pasted onto this record. The frame sits on the criminal law page. The basis is the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.