
In short
Enforcement based on a judgment becomes time-barred when ten years pass over the last step. The clock does not run from memory from the date on the judgment. If there is an attachment, a request for sale, or another enforcement step in between, that record is the last step. A notarial deed is not inside these ten years. Even if the period has ended, the office does not close every file of its own accord. The debtor raises limitation in proper form. No other year is added to this text.
The date of the judgment is not, by itself, the end day if there is a step in between. It is not said that it has fallen while there is no last-step line.
What counts as the last step
The last step is an enforcement act in the file that has a result. Service of the enforcement order, an attachment, a request for sale, or a collection can be read in this frame. Opening the file and looking inside, taking a copy of a paper, or viewing the record on the screen is not the last step. Which line is treated as interrupting is separated one by one from the list of steps. A line that is not separated is not treated as having renewed the period. The creditor shows the date and the type of the last step with papers. A movement that cannot be shown does not start the ten years from the beginning.
Falling out of operation is not limitation. The file can go to sleep because attachment was not requested. In a sleeping file the judgment claim does not disappear of its own accord unless the ten years have also ended. Treating the two clocks as one leads the creditor to an early waiver and the debtor to an early ease. Sleep does not take the place of the last-step line. If there is a request for renewal, the papers of that request are read. If there are no papers, the renewal is not treated as having interrupted the ten years.
A notarial deed and a claim without a judgment are not the same clock
The Act leaves enforcement based on a notarial deed to its own limitation, according to the nature of the deed. An acknowledgement deed in official form can enter the route on a judgment. Entering it does not carry the ten years of a judgment onto that deed. The type of the document is read from the nature of the deed, not from the heading saying “judgment.” If the types mix, the ten years of the judgment are not pasted onto the deed.
An invoice, a contract, and a promissory note are not a judgment either. Their periods are read from the claim’s own source. This record does not turn those periods into the ten years of a judgment. No other year is added. Gathering every type of enforcement in one sentence breaks the clock of the judgment. Which paper is a judgment, and which is a deed, is separated from the original in the file.
Limitation is, as a rule, the debtor’s defence. The creditor does not have to close the creditor’s own file because the period has ended. The debtor also notifies the period, inside a complaint or an objection to the enforcement order, by the procedure the file requires. The oral sentence “ten years have passed” does not erase the attachment annotation. The notice is tied to a petition and to service. A word that is not tied is not treated as having put the period into operation.
If the period that is raised is accepted, attachment and sale can fall according to the result of that acceptance. Acceptance is not the return of money that was paid. Return is a separate request. While there is no request, a collection is not taken back of its own accord. A claim of deduction is not built without the last-step papers.
Neighbouring records
The opening of enforcement on a judgment sits under enforcement on a judgment. The first step of the debtor who receives the order sits under the enforcement order. A sleeping file sits under a file that has fallen out of operation, and a notarial deed sits under a notarial deed. The general frame of the types of enforcement sits under limitation in enforcement. This record separates only the ten-year clock of the judgment.
Which papers come side by side
The documents that are read are the judgment, the list of steps, and the last attachment or sale writing. Service separates, from the annotation, when the enforcement order arrived. If there is no annotation, service is not completed as the last step. The petition should write after which step limitation ended. A petition that does not write it treats the date of the judgment as the end day. The decision should show whether the period was accepted. While there is no decision, the attachment is not treated as having come off. The application should carry the date and the type of the last step. A contract can be the basis of the judgment. A contract does not change the ten years of the judgment. An invoice is not a judgment. An invoice does not produce a last-step line. The register shows whether the attachment of the immovable is still standing. The register does not put limitation into operation of its own accord. If the minute writes a collection or an attachment, that minute is read in the debate on the last step. If there is no minute, a screenshot is not treated as the last step.
Where the period of the judgment is read from
This article places the judgment, the list of steps, and the last enforcement paper side by side. This article does not add another year to these ten years. This article does not treat a notarial deed as the period of the judgment. The Çankaya office does not change the competent authority.
It is not said that it has fallen before the last-step line is seen. If the debtor has not raised the period in proper form, the office record is not treated as erased of its own accord.
Conclusion
Limitation in the enforcement of a judgment is ten years from the last step. The date of the judgment is not, by itself, the end day if there is a step in between. A notarial deed does not stick to these ten years. An Ankara lawyer does not add another year to the ten years of the judgment. The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the limitation provision for enforcement on a judgment in the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.