In short
The application that is read when a residence card is lost is a request for a new document because of the loss. This request is not cancellation of the permit. A loss notice records that the card is not with the person. An extension petition does not take the place of this request. Using someone else’s card is not in this article. Whether the permit is continuing is read from the permit record, and from the cancellation writing if there is one, not from the minute.
A loss notice is not a cancellation writing
A loss notice says the document is not in hand. Cancellation is a separate step by which the administration brings the permit to an end. If there is no cancellation sentence in the notice, the notice is not turned into a cancellation decision. If there is a cancellation writing, that writing is read from its own text. Even if the two papers were drawn up on the same day, one does not take the place of the other. Their standing in the same envelope does not join the leaves either.
If the addressee of the cancellation writing and the person of the loss minute are not the same, the documents are not counted as each other’s continuation. Even if the names are the same, the ground of cancellation is not built from the loss sentence of the minute. The service record shows to whom the cancellation writing reached. If there is no record, reaching is not produced from the day the minute was drawn up.
If it is told that the card was stolen, the act line in the minute is read. If the line says loss, the text is not completed from a claim of theft. If the line says theft, this sentence is not the result of a criminal investigation. If there are investigation papers, they are read from their own heading. If there are not, the minute is not named as an investigation decision. If the signature line on the minute is empty, the gap is not read as also meaning that there was no loss. If there is a signature, the signature does not announce that the permit is continuing. If the minute counts more than one document, the residence card stays on its own line. If it is written on the same paper that the passport was lost as well, the two losses are not each other’s application. Renewal of the passport is not treated as having completed the request for a residence card.
How the heading of the request for a document is read
The heading of the application is read as to whether it is a request for a document because of the loss. If the heading is an extension, a first permit, or another request, that request is not put in place of the loss request. Which unit asked for which form is read from the paper note at the moment of the step. This article does not freeze a unit name. If there is no note, the form is not chosen from a guess on this page.
The number of the old card, the passport page, and the loss minute are placed side by side as to whether they belong to the same person. If the person line does not match, the paper is not counted as that person’s loss file. A match does not announce that the permit is continuing. The permit record is read separately. If the card number in the record is the same as the old card, this likeness does not say that a new card was printed. A new card is the document of a separate result.
A receipt of the application can show that the paper was delivered. The receipt does not mean the new card was given. The file number on the receipt is not the card number. An appointment day is not read as the day the card is delivered either. If there is a note of delivery of the new card by courier or by hand, the note is read from the note’s own sentence. If there is no note, delivery is not built from the moment it is said that the appointment was attended. If another person’s name is in the delivery note, and that name and the applicant are not the same, the card is not counted as this person’s document. Even if the name is the same, the note does not say that the permit was cancelled, or that the permit is continuing.
The cost of the application is not in this text. An amount is not written while there is no receipt in hand. If there is a receipt, the figure is not carried onto this page. The existence of the receipt does not mean the application was accepted.
The minute does not mean a new card was printed
If the card’s number and the person’s particulars are standing, the minute can carry them over from the old document. The carrying over does not mean a new card was printed. While there is no result, the minute is not presented as a document to be used in place of the card. The signature on the minute does not announce that the permit is continuing.
If the card is found later, the card that was found and the minute are placed side by side. The finding does not erase the minute on this page. Whether the old card can be used again is read from the administration’s writing, if there is one. If there is no writing, the card that was found is not shown as the result of the request for a new document. This text does not tell of keeping or showing the card that was found.
A card that is worn but still in hand is not a loss. The card in hand not being readable may not be the subject of a loss minute. Which application is open is separated from the heading of the form. If the heading is not loss, this page does not rename that form as a loss request.
Someone else’s card does not pass a permit
A card found on the ground, or a card that belongs to someone else, is not the permit document of the person who found it. If the name, the photograph, and the number on the card are not the same as the person in the passport, the document does not belong to that person. This article does not tell of transacting with someone else’s card, of showing the card, or of keeping the card. Finding a lost card does not pass a permit to the person who found it. The route of getting the card to its owner is not built step by step in this text either. What is read is that it is not the loss application of the person on the card.
If the person lost their own card, borrowing someone else’s card does not take the place of their own document either. A borrowed card is not treated as having completed the loss application. A card of someone in the family does not fill the other’s empty application. The same surname does not join the cards. If it is said that another person’s fingerprint or signature is on the card, this word does not put who the card belongs to ahead of the name in the passport. Belonging is read from the name, the photograph, and the number on the card. If these three do not match the person in the passport, the document does not belong to that person. A match is not treated as having completed the loss application.
An extension form is not this request
An extension is a request relating to the end of the permit. A loss application is a request for a document in place of a document that is not in hand. One does not fill the other’s form. An extension having been made does not mean a new card was printed in place of the lost card. A loss notice does not mean the extension request was accepted either. Even if the two applications were made in the same week, each stays in its own heading.
A residence permit not being extended reads the extension notification. The ground in that article is not the text of the loss minute. This heading does not write the extension form and the ground of refusal again. A writing that the permit was not extended is not treated as having cancelled the lost card. If there is no cancellation sentence in that writing, a sentence is not added from here.
Refusal of a work permit is the notification of a work application. A work-permit document is separate from a residence card. The loss of one is not read as the application of the other. A refusal writing does not put the lost residence card in its place. If the work document is standing and the residence card is not, each document carries its own fate.
A photocopy and an annotation do not take the place of the card
A photocopy or a photograph of the old card can recall the number and the date on the card. It is not a new card. The photocopy is not shown as the result of the loss application. If the administration has not given a new document, the photocopy is not used as a document that was given. The photograph being sharp does not make it a card either.
An apostille is the annotation on a foreign document. The annotation does not take the place of the lost residence card. A paper with an apostille can carry the card number. Even if it carries it, the annotation does not mean a new card was printed. A foreigner’s acquisition of immovable property looks at the land-registry record. A title deed is not the loss application for a residence card. A parcel does not complete the loss minute. This text does not write the conditions of acquiring title.
A passport identity page is not put in place of the card either. If the passport is standing with the person, this does not mean the residence card was not lost. The two documents are separate. The passport’s end day is not the result of the loss request. Writing the number of the old card on a paper does not produce a new card. Even if the number is remembered correctly, the paper is not a document the administration gave. An image in a digital wallet is not used as a card that was given either, if the administration has not given a new card. The image does not take the place of the loss minute either. The date in the image is not read as the result day of the application.
Conclusion
A loss notice is not cancellation of the permit. The application that is made is a request for a document on the loss, and it is read apart from an extension petition. The minute is not a new card. Someone else’s card is not used. A photocopy, an apostille, and title do not take the place of this request. A cost is not in this text. The frame is on the international law page. The basis is the text of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458. The minute and the particulars of the old card can be sent through contact.