Enforcement & bankruptcy · Legal information

If the Enforcement File Does Not Appear on UYAP, Is Service Treated as Absent?

Author · Av. Ayşenur Konar, Avukat

Published ·

In short

If the enforcement file does not appear on UYAP, this gap does not mean the service did not happen. The file number is read from the principal-number line on the payment order, the service piece, or the envelope. The screen does not produce the number. If the number is not on the paper, a result that there was no service is not written from the empty screen either. What is looked at in a file that appears is in the article an enforcement file was opened. This text does not build that reading again.

This article answers whether the file not appearing on the screen is counted as an absence of service. It does not answer what is done if the file appears, the reasoning of a returned envelope, the working of electronic service, or how the notice is answered.

An empty screen does not erase the paper

The citizen screen, the lawyer screen, and the query result may not be the same image. Which one is empty is read from that printout itself. An empty printout does not do away with the service piece in hand. If the piece stands, service is read from the annotation on the piece. While there is no piece, the empty screen does not build a judgment that service did not happen. The reason of the gap may also be a wrong query, another office, or the record not having fallen onto the screen. The reason is not chosen before the printout and the paper stand side by side.

The hour and the query sentence on the printout show the image at that moment. The next look being full does not cause the earlier gap to be written as service having existed. The earlier look being empty does not erase the annotation in hand either. If the screen image does not stand in the file, the image stays as a gap recounted orally. The account is not put in the place of the service piece. If the piece and the image conflict, the piece is read for the annotation. The image shows what the query wrote. A new annotation is not built by joining the two.

The principal-number line is on the paper

The principal number, the year, and the office name are at the top of the paper. Writing a name on the screen and getting an empty result does not mean that principal number was never opened. A similarity of name may also bring another file. If the number of the file that came does not match the number on the paper, the screen that does not match is not put in the place of the paper. If there is no principal number on the paper, a number is not written by a guess.

If the principal number on the payment order and the principal number on the envelope are separate lines, the two are put side by side. If they do not match, the line that does not match is not written in the other's place. If the short name of the office, the province name, or the directorate name is missing on the paper, the missing part is not invented from the screen. If the screen shows one office and the paper writes another office, the office that is shown is not chosen as this file. The choice is made from the line on the paper. If the year column has slipped, the slip is not a result the empty query confirmed. The slip is read on the paper itself.

If a file number was said only in a telephone conversation and there is no paper, neither the empty screen nor the full screen builds a judgment of service. A note of the conversation is not a service piece. The number written in the note is not announced as the principal number while there is no piece in hand.

The kind of query changes the result

Searching by name, searching by identity number, and searching by principal number are not the same query. If one is empty and the other is full, the full one does not carry the judgment of the empty one. The empty one does not erase the full one either. What was written in which box is read from there, if it stands on the printout. If the printout does not show the query criterion, the criterion is not completed with words that are remembered.

Searching with a short trade name may not have found the legal person on the invoice. Which trade name stands on the invoice is in the article the debtor company on the invoice. If the trade name is long on the paper and short in the query, the short query is not the absence of the file. A tax number and a personal identity number are separate criteria as well. An empty result with one does not change the number of the other on the paper.

An attachment notice is a paper as well. The file not appearing on the screen does not erase the principal-number line on the notification. What the notification is is in the article an attachment notice. How the answer is written is in the article how an attachment notice is answered. The empty screen does not build the period or the content of that answer in this text. The answer is read with the notification's own annotation and the office record. While there is no annotation, the empty query is not completed as an answer having been given, or not having been given.

The annotation and the empty query

Whether there was service is read from the annotation and the reasoning on the service piece. The annotation is not erased by the screen staying empty. If there is no annotation, the empty screen is not written in the place of an annotation. A returned envelope is a separate paper. Its reasoning is in the article a return of service. If the returned envelope stands and the screen is empty, the reasoning on the envelope is read. If there is no reasoning, the empty screen is not written as a reasoning. If the principal number on the envelope does not match the principal number on the payment order, the envelope that does not match is not counted as the return of this file.

If there is an electronic-service record, that record is also read from its own paper. While there is no record, electronic service is not assumed. That channel is in the article electronic service. If the electronic record stands and the citizen screen is empty, the record has not been erased. If there is no record and the screen is empty too, electronic service is not treated as having happened. The two absences do not do away with a paper annotation either. If the paper annotation stands separately, the annotation is read from its own piece.

If the file appears on the lawyer's screen and does not appear on the debtor's screen, the lawyer's image is not the debtor's service annotation. The debtor's empty image does not erase the lawyer's record either. Service is looked for on whichever piece or record it belongs to. One person's printout is not pasted as the other's annotation.

A restricted image and an error writing

The screen may say there is no record. The screen may also say there is no authority, it cannot be viewed, or the act could not be completed. These sentences are not the same result. Which sentence is written is read from the printout's own line. A sentence of no authority does not mean the file was never opened. A sentence that the act could not be completed does not mean there was no service. A sentence that there is no record does not make the payment order in hand void either. The sentence shows what that query returned at that moment.

If there is an annotation of confidentiality or restriction on the paper, the annotation is read as it was written. While there is no annotation, the empty screen is not completed as a confidentiality decision. If there is confidentiality, the empty query does not erase the annotation on the service piece either. An error code, or a technical warning, is not translated into this text if the meaning of the code is not written on the printout. A warning that is not translated does not build a judgment that there was no service.

If the file number stands on the paper, the number is the same number after the error writing as well. The error does not turn the number into the correct number. If another file appears under the error screen, the file that appears is not announced as this file without matching the number on the paper.

The printout and the file cover

If the principal number on the paper appears on the screen under another debtor's name, the name that appears does not stand in for the paper. If the name does not match the debtor line on the paper, the screen that does not match is not chosen as this file. The choice is made from the line on the payment order or on the service piece. If the screen shows the same number on more than one line, which line belongs to this paper is separated from the office name and the year. A line that is not separated is not pasted as a service annotation.

If an image of the file cover is in hand, the principal number on the cover stands even if the screen is empty. The image is not the service annotation itself. The annotation is on the service piece. If the cover and the piece conflict, each is read from its own line. The conflict is not used in order to announce a result for or against the empty query. If the creditor's lawyer says he saw the file, the saying does not erase the piece in the debtor's hand. If there is no piece, the saying does not build a judgment that service existed either.

The query printout having been taken from the printer does not make the printout a service piece. If there is no line on the printout called a service annotation, a line is not invented. A line that is not invented does not make the empty screen a full service. A full screen does not produce a service date for a paper that has no piece either. If the date stands on the piece, or in the electronic record, it is read from there. If it does not stand, the gap is not completed as a date.

The printout having been brought by the creditor or by the debtor does not change the kind of the printout. The person who brought it does not produce an annotation. The annotation is on the piece. If the statement of the person who brought it did not pass onto minutes, the statement does not fill the gap of the printout. The gap stays as that result, whichever query's result it is. If the result sentence is not on the printout, the summary of the person who brought it does not build a judgment that there is no record.

Conclusion

Not appearing on the screen does not mean the service did not happen. The file number is read from the paper. An empty query does not stand in for the service annotation. An error writing does not produce an annotation either. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the text of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law numbered 2004. If the paper and the printout of the empty screen stand, contact is made on those two records.

Legislation

Frequently asked questions

If the file does not appear on UYAP, is service treated as absent?

It is not treated as absent. An empty screen does not erase the piece of service. If the piece stands, service is read from the annotation on the piece. While there is no piece, the empty screen does not build a judgment that there was no service either.

Is the file number read from the screen?

No. The principal number is read from the payment order, the service piece, or the line on the envelope. The screen does not produce a number that is not written on the paper.

Does not finding it by searching the name mean the file was never opened?

It does not. A name query does not stand in for the principal number on the paper. If the number of another file that came does not match the number on the paper, the screen that does not match is not taken as the basis.

If the service piece stands and the screen is empty, does the annotation fall?

It does not fall. The annotation is on the piece. An empty query is not written in the place of the annotation. If there is no annotation either, the empty screen is not completed as an annotation.

Are the citizen screen and the lawyer screen the same image?

They are not assumed to be the same image. Which one is empty is read from that printout itself. The emptiness of one screen does not have the record on the other treated as absent of itself.

Related reading

This article sits under one practice area. The neighbouring guides carry the detail that does not belong in this text.

Practice areas · Enforcement & bankruptcy

Sources

AK

Author

Av. Ayşenur Konar

Lawyer on the Ankara Bar Association roll, founder of Konar Hukuk. This text is general information; a specific file is reviewed separately. Author profile · Editorial policy

A consultation

We can look at the matter with you. The path depends on the documents. This is not a promise about the result.

Call