In short
The question of what an attachment notice is, is the enforcement office notifying a person of the debtor's claim against that third person. An employer, a tenant, a bank, or the counterparty of a current account reports in writing whether the debt exists, its amount, and any pledge. There is no reply day in this text. The period is read from the text of the papers that arrived.
The notice is not read as if it passes of itself onto the debtor's own account. Attachment of the balance in the debtor's own account is another face. If the headings and the addressees of the two papers are mixed, the reply goes to the wrong place. If there is no addressee line, an addressee is not invented.
On whom the notice is served
A third person is someone who owes the debtor money, property, or a right. An employer's wages, a tenant's rent, a bank account, and a current account are examples of this relation. A guarantor may be the addressee of a notice, separately from the principal debt. The guarantor's own debt sits under guarantor. The notice is not a copy of the guarantee contract. The contract may show what the third person owes the debtor. If there is no contract, it is not said that a debt exists.
A notice that went to the wrong address opens a debate about service. The addressee's name, the branch, and the tax number should be clear on the minutes. If the minutes do not carry these lines, service is not assumed to have happened. The service annotation shows to whom, and on which date, it reached. If there is no annotation, the date is not completed. A date that is not completed is not written as the reply day.
What the reply must say
The notice asks for a written reply on points such as whether a debt exists, the amount, the due date, set-off, and a pledge. The reply must accord with the truth and carry the file number. The reply is given to the enforcement office. Telephoning only the debtor is not enough. The petition must show, by number, which notice is being answered. If there is no number, a number is not invented.
The second and later notifications attach a different result according to the first reply. The order of the papers that arrived is read. If the order is not on the document, an order is not invented. How the reply is written sits under a reply to the notice. This text does not turn the steps under that heading into a number of days.
A wrong report, and doors that get mixed
Reporting that there is no debt, contrary to the truth, or reporting the amount short, may give rise to a claim to hold the third person liable up to the attached claim. Writing that a debt exists when it does not produces a debate about a wrong payment and a refund. Not every incomplete reply means a full debt in every file. The decision reads from the document whether the report was contrary to the truth. While there is no document, an amount of liability is not announced.
Attachment of the debtor's own bank account sits under a bank account. The frame of a wage deduction sits under attachment of wages. How attachment arises sits under how attachment works. An ownership claim for the third person's own property sits under an ownership claim. The reply to the notice does not stand in for the ownership-claim petition. An invoice may show what the third person owes the debtor. An invoice is not a reply given to the notice. The registry may confirm the company's name. The registry does not write the amount of the debt.
The third person should keep, together with the reply, the contract in hand, any invoice, and the slip for a payment already made. A slip does not show in every file that the debt has ended. The remaining balance is read when the slip and the contract stand side by side. If the two are absent, a balance is not invented. If more than one notice has arrived, the date and the order of each paper are written separately. If the order is mixed, a later paper is not put in the place of the first reply. If the reply says there is no debt, the basis of that is written as well. An absence without a basis may not count as a reply in accordance with the truth. Whether it counts is not announced without the text that arrived and the third person's documents. A reply day is not produced in order to close this gap.
The employer keeps the wage payroll separate from the reply to the notice. The payroll is not itself the rate of deduction. There is no rate in this text. The tenant may show the term of the lease and the months that were paid. A number of months is not written as the period for replying to the notice. The bank separates the account record by branch. If the branch is mixed, it is read like attachment of the wrong account. That mix-up does not make the third-person notification into the debtor's own account.
Where the notice is read from
The addressee of the papers that arrived is read, and this article does not add the reply day to this text. An Ankara lawyer reads, from the annotation on the notice, that the office being in Çankaya does not change the competent authority. This article does not treat a third-person notification as attachment of the debtor's own account. This article does not write silence as a full debt in every file.
Conclusion
The answer to what an attachment notice is, is notification of the claim in the hands of a third person. The reply is given to the enforcement office, and in accordance with the truth. The reply day is not written. The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy page. The basis is the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law.