In short
A reply to an attachment notice is the third person reporting in writing, to the enforcement office, the debt or the right in hand. A bank, an employer, a tenant, or a person who is owed money may be the addressee in that capacity; panic about attachment of the debtor's own account is not the subject of this heading. There is no ready-made petition and no reply day in this text. The period is read from the original notice that was served; while the original is absent a day is not invented, a ready-made petition does not take the place of the service annotation, and the third person is not treated as having met the reply period while the original notice is not there.
To whom the reply is given, and how
The reply is given in writing to the enforcement office; sending a message to the debtor, explaining by telephone, or dropping an internal note does not stand in for a reply given to the office. The file number, the date of the notice, and the capacity of the addressee must stand at the head of the text, and a missing heading is not treated as completed later. The definition what the notice is comes before this procedure. What is asked here is how the report is built and with which document it goes to the office; a message sent to the debtor does not stand in for this document, and an internal note is not a reply given to the enforcement office either.
What is written in the report
The third person writes, in accordance with the truth, whether a debt or a claim exists, its amount, and its due date; a guess does not stand in for the record. If there is a claim of deduction, pledge, security, or set-off, it is shown with the supporting document. If a payment was made earlier, the slip or the contract record takes its place in the annex to the reply, and it is written which file it belongs to. The sentence "I do not know" is not, in every concrete case, treated as a sufficient report; the amount, the due date, and a claim of deduction are written with the record, and the slip or the contract annex must show which file it belongs to.
The period is read from service
The notice, as a rule, asks for a reply within a set period; that period depends on the date of service and on the order of the papers, and a day is not written from memory. The date of the petition is not treated as met before the service annotation is read. The Çankaya address does not put the enforcement office to which the reply will be submitted in the place of the file. The office's record copy stands ahead of an oral date; if there is no envelope, a calculation of the period is not built either, the reply day is not produced from this gap, and the date of the petition is not treated as kept before the service annotation is read.
The cost of a wrong statement
Writing that a debt exists when it does not may give rise to a debate about a mistaken payment and a refund; hiding a debt that does exist may lead to a claim of the third person's liability. The reply is built with the record, the contract, and the payment document, not with a guess. An ownership claim is a separate door of action. The duty to reply to the notice should not be taken for the same petition as an ownership claim; one is a claim of right, the other is the third person's report, and writing that a non-existent debt exists may also give rise to a refund debate.
So that it is not mixed with the employer's letter
A wage-deduction letter that goes to the employer may resemble the classic third-person notice; an order to deduct and a reply to the notice are not the same text. Wage attachment sent to the employer is that letter's own question. Attachment of the bank account does not explain the third person's duty to reply. An invoice does not of itself prove the third person's debt; the record and the contract are read together, an order to deduct is not a copy of the reply to the notice, and attachment of the bank account does not explain the third person's duty to report either.
Conclusion
The reply to the notice is the third person's written and accurate statement; it is not a copy of attachment of the debtor's account. The general frame stands on the Ankara enforcement lawyer page and in the text of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004. No text is produced without the original notice, the service, and the reply petition; the reply day is not announced while those three papers are absent, an oral date does not go ahead of the office record, and no text is produced while the original notice, the service, and the petition are absent. The third person should show, in the same text, the file number, the date of the notice, the service annotation, and any payment document; while these records are absent it is not announced that a debt exists or does not, the employer's deduction letter is not put in the place of this report, a ready-made petition does not fill a gap in service, the Çankaya address does not choose the office the reply will go to, and an oral date does not go ahead of the office's copy either.