In short
If a physician is called to the prosecution office, the status and the act on the summons paper are read first. The status is the word written on the paper. On an investigation summons this word may be suspect or witness. The act is the medical event the paper asks about. The patient's complaint petition and a statement text are not on this page. A number of days is not added.
With which word the status was written
In the investigation stage, the person under suspicion of an offence is called a suspect. When the prosecution starts, the same person takes the name of accused. A witness is separate from these two words. Whichever the summons writes is read. A status the patient used in the corridor does not change the paper. Oral news does not change it either. If one place on the paper writes suspect and another place writes witness, the two words are not closed. Which heading is the principal status of the summons is read from the summons section of the paper. If the section is mixed, it is left mixed. The mixture is not corrected with a status the reader chose.
A person whose statement will be taken, or who will be questioned, is called with a summons. The reason is written openly on the summons. If the reason line consists of a short name of an event, that name is read. If there is no name, the name is not derived from the file number. If the sentence that one will be brought by force if one does not come stands on the paper, that sentence is read. If the sentence is absent, this text does not add it. A decision of bringing by force is not the summons sentence turned of itself into minutes. The decision stands separately. If the date of the decision and the date of the summons differ, the difference is not closed.
The name of the authority on the summons paper is also read. Which prosecution office wrote it is in the heading. If there is no heading, the number is not completed as the prosecution office of another province. The address of the institution where the physician works does not stand in for the service address. Whichever address the service went out to is read.
The investigation number and the hospital protocol number are not joined as the same figure. If only one is on the summons, the other is not treated as existing. If both numbers were written, both are read. If the names of more than one physician stand on the same summons, each name stays with its own status. One being written as suspect does not make the name beside him a suspect too. The status is looked for separately beside each name. If there is no status beside the name, the status is not copied onto everyone from the heading of the list. If the heading says a single status and the names stand one under the other, the paper is read that way. If the paper does not separate, a separation is not invented.
What the act line is asking
The act is which procedure, which day, and which result is being asked. If the date line is empty, a remembered day of the intervention is not written. If more than one procedure stands one under the other, each line is its own sentence. If the lines were not tied to a single event, the tie is not built from the reader's mind. If the name of the procedure is a general word such as "intervention", the word is left as it is. The general word is not narrowed as the name of a particular surgery or of a particular medicine. Narrowing adds to the summons an act the paper did not ask.
If the result sentence stands on the paper as "injury" or "death", the word that stands is read. If there is no word, the result is not carried from the discharge summary in the patient's file. If the discharge summary is attached to the summons, the annex stands as its own page. A sentence inside the annex is not treated as having changed the act line of the summons. The act line is still looked for on the summons.
If the summons writes the place and the hour where the statement will be taken, the line that writes them is read. If the line is empty, it is left empty. An empty hour is not completed from the institution's working arrangement. This not-completing does not teach the physician what he will say in the room either. A statement sentence, a sentence of silence, and a route of correcting the record are not in this text. If the summons carries a line about coming with defence counsel, the line is read. If there is no line, this page does not add that line. The existence of the line does not mean the text of the statement was written. The physician reads the act the paper asked. The words of the answer to be given to the act are not built here.
The name of the event on the paper is not a finding of the separation between a complication and a medical error. That separation is in the article a complication or a medical error. The frame of a medical practice error sits under medical malpractice. The summons does not stand in for these two articles. The name of the event on the summons is not read as if fault was found, or as if fault was not found. What is read is which event the prosecution office asked about.
The witness paper and the suspect paper
If the paper says witness, the physician is the person heard about someone else's act. On a witness summons the result of not coming is written. The result sentence is read from the paper. If the paper says suspect, the status changes. The warning of bringing by force on the suspect paper is not carried as a copy of the witness paper. The two statuses are not joined as the same minutes. If two separate summonses came to the same physician, each summons stays with its own status. One does not erase the other's hour or act.
The physician knows that, as to information he learned about the patient and the relatives by reason of the profession, there may be a separate paper of refraining from testimony. This article does not build that sentence of refraining. A paper that writes the consent of the person concerned is not written here either. If refraining or consent stands in the file, it is read with its own heading. If it does not, a text as if it did not stand is not produced. A statement text is not produced either. What the physician will say, what he will not say, and with which sentence he will stay silent, is not the subject of this page. Correcting a line in the record later, or doing away with a document, is not the subject of this article either.
Where the patient's complaint will go is in the article the process of a complaint about a doctor. That article is the patient's route. The summons in the physician's hand does not teach the items of that petition. If a copy of the complaint petition is attached to the summons, the annex does not change the status of the summons. The account in the annex does not stand in for the act line. The act stays as the sentence written on the summons.
The service slip is not oral news
A notice made by telephone, fax, or electronic mail does not carry the result tied to the summons paper. Which paper was served is seen from the service slip. On the slip, the date, the address, and the name of the person served are read. If the name belongs to someone else, it is not treated as served on this physician. While there is no slip, news of "you will come to the prosecution office tomorrow" does not stand in for the summons. On which day the news was said is not written into this text as a number of days either.
If the date of the service slip and the date of the summons paper differ, the two dates stand separately. The signature on the slip does not change the word of status on the summons. If the signature cannot be read, it is left as not readable. Service made on the institution is not service that went out in the physician's name. The institution's stamp does not of itself mean the physician received the service. If there is a slip that went out separately to the physician, that slip is read.
If the names of documents asked to be brought are written on the summons, the names that are written are read. If there is no list, the list is not built from this page. Whether a document on the list stands in the hospital file does not change the status of the summons. Correcting the document later, or doing away with a missing page, is not recounted here. What is recounted is whether the list is on the paper. If the summons was written to a lawyer or to an institution, and did not go out separately in the physician's name, the physician is not treated as summoned. A paper that went out to the lawyer is read together with whether the power of attorney stands in the file. If there is no power of attorney, the absence does not paste the summons onto the physician.
The file the summons does not close
The summons does not close the merits of compensation. The general separation of the criminal route and the compensation route is in the article criminal proceedings and compensation. This text does not build that separation from the start. On which day the prosecution office will end the investigation is not here either. If the period is not written on the paper, it is not added. That the summons has come does not mean a prosecution was opened either. The prosecution starts with acceptance of the indictment. If that paper is not in hand, it is left as absent. The summons is not an acquittal or a conviction either. This text does not build a promise of a result.
If both a prosecution summons and a hospital writing stand for the same event, the two are read separately. A disciplinary or administrative heading on the hospital writing does not change the status on the summons. The act on the summons does not close the result of the hospital writing either. Which writing carries which number is taken from the heading of that writing.
The office in Çankaya does not choose the authority the file will go to.
Conclusion
The physician separates the status and the act on the summons. The complaint petition and the statement text are not written on this page. Oral news does not stand in for the service slip. The frame is on the health law page. If the paper stands, the assessment is made on that paper through contact. The basis is the summons provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.