In short
The responsibility of the anaesthetist and the surgeon is read from which hour was written to which physician in the file. The hour of the anaesthesia form does not erase the hour of the operation note. The hour of the operation note does not erase the anaesthesia form either. The two names standing on the same paper does not paste the two onto the same act. Neither a ready sentence of partnership nor a ready sentence of zeroing comes out of this file.
Two forms, two series of hours
The anaesthesia form carries one series of hours and one signature. The operation note carries another series of hours and another signature. Whatever the form's own column headings are, those headings are read. A stage that is not written in the heading is not added to a stage list on this page. Which hour the operation note cut comes out of the note's own line. If the note does not repeat a figure on the anaesthesia form, it is not treated as if the repeat existed. Even if the two figures are the same, their being the same does not mean the two physicians wrote the same act. The same minute can stand on two separate lines.
If there is a joint minute, which name stands beside which hour is again read from the line. If there is no name, a name is not added. If there is no hour, an hour is not produced by being copied from the other form. If the heading of the minute is a general word such as "operation team", this word does not reduce the two physicians to a single signature. If the team list is on a separate page, the name on the list does not take the place of the name on the hour line. A person who is on the list and whose signature does not stand on the note is not treated as having undertaken the act on the note. A person whose signature is on the note and whose name does not stand on the list is not treated as erased from the list either.
Law No. 1219 is the frame of the practice of medicine. Which hour belongs to which physician does not come out of this statute as a figure. The place it comes out of is the file. Before the file is seen, the share of the two physicians is not announced. The name of the branch is not put in the place of the hour column. The word "anaesthesia" standing on the cover does not fill the empty hour inside the form. The word "surgery" does not complete the missing line of the operation note either.
The pre-operative assessment paper is separate from the anaesthesia form during the operation. If a physician's name stands on the pre-assessment, that name is not treated as having written the hour on the theatre form. If there is another name on the theatre form, both names stay. If the reason for the change is not on the paper, a reason is not invented. The recovery or waking record is a third sheet too. The hour on this sheet does not erase the surgeon's hour of suturing. The surgeon's note does not fill the waking line either. If the three sheets stand in the same folder, their headings are read apart.
If the hour of the incision or of the closure stands on the operation note, that hour is read. If there is another word opposite the same minute on the anaesthesia form, the word is left in place. The two words are not turned into a single act. If the form does not write who did what in this minute, the place that does not write stays empty. The empty place is not shared as "it is the surgeon's" or "it is the anaesthetist's". A sharing exists only if there is a name on the line.
A signature does not undertake an act that does not stand beside it
One physician's signature does not fill the other physician's unwritten hour. A full signature is not treated as having undertaken an act that does not stand beside it either. The signature standing in the collective approval place at the bottom of the page does not tie every line above to that signature. The line beside which there is an initial is the line that is read. A line without an initial does not close of itself with the signature below. If two signatures are on the same line, both names stand. One does not take the other out of that line.
A stamp does not take the place of the name where the name cannot be read. If the name on the stamp and the handwriting are different, both are written. The difference is not turned into a fault judgment in this text. What is turned is the parting that appears on the paper. If an erased name cannot be chosen from underneath, it is left as cannot be chosen. A name that cannot be chosen is not completed from the duty chart. If the chart stands in the file, the chart is read as its own page. The name on the chart does not fill the blank signature box on the form.
If an assistant, a technician or a nurse line carries a separate name on the form, that name is read too. This name is not put in the place of the anaesthetist's or the surgeon's name. The three names standing on the same page does not paste the three onto the same act. Whichever name is beside whichever line, that matching stays. If there is no matching, a distribution of tasks is not built on this page. If the institution's internal directive is not in the file, the directive does not put a task list in the place of the blank line. If the directive stands, the task in the directive and the signature on the form are read side by side. A person who is in the directive and whose signature does not stand on the form is not treated as having undertaken the act on the form.
A common page does not melt two acts
If two signatures are on the same page, the page is read without melting the two acts into a single sentence. A line that does not melt is not joined with a slogan. If the sentence "they were looked at together" does not stand in the note, this sentence is not produced. If the sentence stands, beside which hour the sentence was written is also read. A together sentence without an hour does not turn the whole form into a single act. One line staying blank does not erase the name on the other line either.
Responsibility is not closed by being written to both of them in every file, or by being erased from both of them. The closing is discussed after the hour and the signature come side by side. This article does not place a judgment in the place of that discussion. The judgment is not announced before the file is seen. If the hour the patient's relatives kept and the hour on the form are different, both hours are written. The relatives' hour does not fill the column that is empty on the form. The form hour does not erase the relative's note as if it never existed either. The two sources stay apart. If one of the sources does not stand in the file, the one that does not stand is not added to the edge of the paper that stands. The physician's name on the hospital invoice does not take the place of this distinction either. The invoice is a collection paper. It is not an hour line. A name standing on the invoice does not mean that name wrote every line. A name that does not stand on the invoice does not fall from the record with their signature on the form.
The consent paper does not distribute the hour
The consent form is the paper of the risk that was told. It does not by itself distribute to whom which hour was written. If both physicians' names appear on the consent, the names that appear are read. A name that appears does not write the operation hour to that physician. If the date of the consent and the date of the procedure are different, the difference is not closed. If there is no consent at all, the absence is not invented from the hour line. The general frame of consent is in the article on informed consent.
The distinction between a known risk and a departure is in the article on whether it is a complication or a medical error. The two headings are not put in the place of the hour line. A risk being mentioned on the form does not show on which physician's line that risk was realised. If the name of what was realised is not on the line, a name is not chosen from the risk list and pasted. If one copy of the consent stands with the patient and one copy in the file, both copies are read. If one is incomplete, the incomplete one is not closed as if a complete copy existed. The incomplete copy does not take the place of the hour line either. The hour is still looked for on the anaesthesia form and in the operation note.
The medical account does not take the place of this page
The medical record of an anaesthesia error is in the article on a claim of an anaesthesia error. This page does not build that account. The question that stands here, before entering that account, is on which physician's line the hour stayed. How the operation was done is not described here either. A technique that is not described does not take the place of the hour distinction. If a device printout, a monitor strip or the back of the anaesthesia card stands in the file, it is read with its own heading. The figure on the printout does not fill the blank in the surgeon's note. The surgeon's note does not write the empty hour on the printout either.
The frame of a medical practice error is in the article on medical malpractice. The distinction between the criminal route and the damages route is in the article on criminal liability and damages. Neither builds from the start which hour belongs to whom. This text does not copy that distinction. What is built is the hour and signature lines of the two forms. Both physicians' names appearing in a file does not mean both routes were opened to both of them. Which route is directed at whom is on that route's own paper.
Conclusion
The distinction is to whom the hour of the anaesthesia form and the hour of the operation note were written. A ready sentence of responsibility is not used. A common cover does not melt the two acts. The framework is on the health law page. The basis is on Law No. 1219. To whom the hour lines belong can also be examined through contact.