Enforcement and attachment
Article 89 and attachment of a right held by a third person
Article 89 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law governs the enforcement officer telling a person, when a claim that is not payable to bearer and does not rest on an endorsable note, or a movable of the debtor held by a third person, is attached, that the person can now pay the debt only to the enforcement office. That notice is the garnishment notice. The invitation to review the attachment minutes is another article.
The third person is not in the same role as the debtor. A bank, an employer or a tenant can fall into that role. The role is read from the name on the notice. This page does not ask for an account number.
An answer to the notice and a result that the debt has ended are not the same sentence. A failure to answer does not produce the same result in every file either. The result is read from the official text and the paper. A sum is not written.
On 14 November 2026 this article heading was read in the official consolidated text. The wording was not carried here.
This page does not replace the official text.
Official source
Next step
Questions
Is an article 89 notice the 103 invitation?
No. The notice goes to a third person. The invitation calls a party who was absent from the minutes.
Does an answer end the debt?
No. The result of an answer is read from the paper and the official text.
Last legislation check: 2026-11-13. Av. Ayşenur Konar.