Enforcement and attachment
Article 67 and the action to annul an objection
Article 67 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law governs a creditor, whose request for pursuit was objected to, suing to annul the objection by proving the claim in court. That action is not the lifting of an objection in the enforcement court. The period is in the official text. This page does not copy it.
In the annulment action the creditor proves the claim within the general rules. The kind of document is not written as the same list as on the lifting route. Which route is open is read from the note, the invoice or the contract.
That the debtor’s objection was unjust is not a result written in advance on this page. A denial indemnity is not added as an automatic head either. A sum is read from the file.
On 14 November 2026 this article heading was read in the official consolidated text. The wording was not carried here.
This page does not replace the official text.
Official source
Next step
Questions
Is annulment the same route as lifting?
No. Annulment is the action in the general court. Lifting is the subject of a separate article.
Is a denial indemnity calculated on this page?
No. The head and the sum are read from the file.
Last legislation check: 2026-11-13. Av. Ayşenur Konar.