Enforcement and attachment
Article 103 and the invitation to review the minutes
Article 103 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law governs inviting an absent party, when the creditor, the debtor or a person authorized to receive service for them is not present while the minutes are drawn, to review the minutes at the enforcement office and to say what they have to say. That invitation is not the garnishment notice that goes to a third person. The period of the invitation is in the official text and is not copied here.
Minutes drawn in someone’s absence do not mean that party accepted the goods. The invitation is for seeing the minutes and saying what they have to say. A result that the sale stopped, or that the goods were released, does not come out of this invitation.
A person authorized to receive service under the Notification Law is not melted into the same sentence as the debtor. Nobody being present does not mean a notice was never sent either. The stamp is read.
On 14 November 2026 this article heading was read in the official consolidated text. The wording was not carried here.
This page does not replace the official text.
Official source
Next step
Questions
Is the 103 invitation a garnishment notice?
No. The invitation is to a party who was not at the minutes. The notice goes to a third person.
Does the invitation drop the attachment?
No. The invitation is a call to review the minutes. The result is read from the paper.
Last legislation check: 2026-11-13. Av. Ayşenur Konar.