In short
If the custodian does not deliver the property, the paper that is read is the custodian line in the attachment minute, and the minute in which the delivery request and the not delivering were written. Not delivering is not the definition of the custodianship. The definition is in the writing on the custodian in an attachment. A claim that the property belongs to a third person is in the writing on an action of ownership. The cost of keeping is in the writing on the cost of preservation and of the custodian. A notification drawn up for money or a right in a third person's hand does not take the place of these minutes. That notification is in the writing on an attachment notice. This text does not rebuild those paths.
This writing answers which minute is read as against the person who does not give the property. It does not answer what the custodian is for, a warehouse fee, how an ownership action is brought, or the definition of the notice.
The two minutes stand apart
The attachment minute shows the list of the property, the place it was left, and the person written as custodian. The delivery minute shows whether the property was later asked for, and whether it was given. The first carries the capacity. The second carries the event of not giving. Not giving is not the definition sentence of the first minute.
A person whose name is not written in the attachment minute is not made the custodian because they were there at the moment of delivery. A warehouse slip does not, by itself, have a person whose name is not in the attachment minute counted as custodian either. The name is read from the line in the attachment minute. If a later minute wrote a new name, the new name is read from that later minute. A family tie, neighbourhood, or being an employee does not change the name on the line.
If the debtor themselves was written as custodian, this is also a line. If a third person was written, that is a separate line as well. The two do not change places with the talk at the moment of delivery. If there is no capacity beside the name in the minute, a capacity is not added by guess. The signature can show that the person whose name stands in the minute saw that line. The signature does not add to the attachment an item that is not on the list. If the objection of the person who denies the signature is not written in the minute either, this text does not invent an objection.
If there is no request line
If the delivery request is not in the minute, a result of not giving is not written into this text. If there is a request, and a record that the person is not giving it or that the property is not in place, the place that is read is that line. "I warned orally" does not take the place of the minute line. If the request was written to another address, the place in the attachment minute and the place in the request are placed side by side. If the place does not hold, the address that does not hold is not completed as not having been given.
A message, a telephone note, or a reminder the creditor kept themselves is not a delivery minute. If these records do not show that the request passed onto the minute, a result of not giving is not built. A petition given to the enforcement office does not become a delivery minute either, before the officer goes to the place and writes what they saw. The petition carries the request. The minute carries what the request found in place. One is not written in the other's place before the two stand side by side.
Sentences that the door was not opened, that no one was there, or that the key was not given are read if they are written in the minute. If they are not written, the event is not added to this text later. If the custodian said they would bring the property, the word is not treated as delivered. The word passing onto the minute does not mean the property was compared with the list either. If there is no comparison line, the piece that was given and the piece that was not given are not distinguished.
The piece on the list
Which piece was not given is read from the list in the attachment minute and the missing line in the delivery minute. If there is no list, a missing piece is not invented. An invoice does not take the place of the item on the list. A photograph does not later include in the attachment an item whose name is not written on the list. If a serial number, a plate, or a brand stands on the list, the delivery line is also read with that distinguisher. If there is no distinguisher, a similar item is not completed as the item on the list.
Property given in part is not treated as wholly given. If the delivery minute separates some lines as received and some lines as not given, the separation is kept. If it was said in a single sentence that all of it is absent, which piece was meant is not drawn one by one from the list. A piece that cannot be drawn is not declared missing. If packaging, a spare part, or the papers inside are not a separate line on the list, they are not treated as having been asked for separately.
A third person's word "this property is mine" does not turn the delivery minute into a petition. The word can pass onto the minute. A word that passed does not give birth to a file number. A word said for part of the property does not spread to the whole of the list. If the registration certificate or the key in an attached vehicle is not on the list, the certificate is not read as the property itself. If the list and the item actually seen conflict, the conflict is not closed with a photograph. The conflict stands on the own line of the two minutes.
If the place has changed
If the property does not stand at the address in the attachment minute, the new place is read from there if it is written in the delivery minute or in a later minute. If it is not written, a new address is not guessed. The custodian saying they sent the property to another warehouse is not counted as delivery at the place where the sending does not appear in the minute. A warehouse slip does not carry the list in the attachment minute by itself. If the number of pieces on the slip and the count on the list do not hold, the slip that does not hold is not memorised as the list of the missing property.
A notice is the notification written for a right or money in a third person's hand. The custodian minute is the record of the property left at the place of attachment. One is not the other's delivery line. A bank extract does not show that the item in the warehouse was not given. The list of items does not show whether the block on the bank account was lifted either. If the two papers are mixed, which one stands in the file is separated from the paper.
Responsibility is built from the two papers
A claim that the property was used, sold, or lost is not tied to an amount before the attachment minute and the delivery minute stand. Compulsion or responsibility is not declared as a result in this text. While the two minutes are missing, a damage item is not written. A fee line is not put in place of this reading of not giving either. The cost of keeping is a separate reading. That cost does not fill the list of the piece that was not given.
If a claim that the property was sold stands beside the minutes with a sale document or a similar record, that record is also read. While there is no record, a sale is not treated as having happened. A claim that it was used is not assumed if there is no photograph or minute line. If a sentence that it was lost was written in the delivery minute as not being in place, that line is read. If there is no writing, the loss is not added to this text as a result. A criminal complaint does not take the place of the delivery minute either. The complaint is a separate writing. The account in the complaint does not widen the attachment list.
Who is asking for delivery
From whom the delivery request came is also read from the minute. The creditor, their representative, or the enforcement officer can be a separate line. The oral request of a person whose name is not on the line is not a minute request. The representative's request does not change the custodian name in the attachment minute if there is no authority annotation in the file. The request does not widen the list of the property either. If the widening does not stand on the own line of the attachment minute, it is not there.
If the custodian says they left the property with a relative, the relative does not become the custodian unless they were written as custodian in the attachment minute. If the relative's word at the moment of delivery passed onto the minute, it is read as it passed. A word that passed does not add to the attachment an item outside the list. If the key of the property, the registration certificate, or the access information is not a separate line on the list, these are not treated as having been asked for as the property itself. A result of not giving is not built for a piece that was not asked for.
If the minutes were drawn up on different dates, each date is on its own paper. The later minute does not erase the earlier one. If the later minute narrowed or widened the earlier list, the narrowing does not take the place of the attachment list unless it was annotated separately in the file. If there is no annotation, the two lists stand side by side. Which one will be counted as missing is read from which list the delivery line refers to. If there is no reference, a missing piece is not declared. If there is a reference and the piece name does not hold, the name that does not hold is not written as missing either.
The officer not signing the minute does not mean the paper was never drawn up. If the signature is missing, the gap is read from the copy in the file. If there is no copy, a missing signature does not build a result that the property was given either. If the giving is written as received on the delivery line, that writing is read. If there is no writing, a debate about the signature is not treated as having completed the delivery. The names of those present stand apart from the custodian line. If a person present was not written as custodian, the person obliged to give the property is not chosen from that list.
Conclusion
Not delivering is not the definition of the custodianship. The place that is read is the custodian line in the attachment minute and the not-giving line in the delivery minute. If the request is not written, a result of not giving is not built. A piece outside the list is not written as missing. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the text of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004. If the two minutes stand, contact is made over those lines.