In short
If a foreign spouse suffers violence, family residence is not assumed to be locked to the consent of the spouse who used the violence. The protection record and the residence record are separate documents. The existence of one does not write the period of the other of itself. How the violence was applied is not in this text. The steps of the protection process are not built here either. That process is in the writing on a protection order against violence.
Family residence is not built from a consent sentence
Family residence is the name of a permit type tied to a spouse or to the person who establishes the family tie. The tie does not mean that person's consent is looked for in every later act. If consent stands as a condition in the writing in the residence file, it is read from there. While there is no such condition in the writing, the spouse's silence, objection, or approval is not added from this text as a condition. The spouse who suffered violence leaving the home is not completed, while it is not in the writing, as an event that ends the permit.
The name of the permit type is whatever is written on the card or in the residence writing. If there is a line that a move was made from family residence to another type, that line is read from its own text. The name of the type does not promise a result of staying in the country. The period is what is written on the card or on the writing. A day and a year are not frozen here. If the period line is empty, it is left empty. The photograph or identity number on the card does not show that the type changed.
That the spouse's signature was looked for on the application form does not mean every later act is locked to that signature. The form is the paper of the moment of application. Cancellation, extension, or a change of type are separate writings. The spouse's signature on the first form is not put in place of the later writing. If the signature line is empty, the gap is not filled with an approval that is remembered later.
The protection record does not take the place of the residence card
A protection order is a separate record kept to prevent violence. How the order is asked for, and how the measure is entered, are not built in this text. The order does not extend the residence card of itself. The card does not give birth to the protection order of itself either. The two papers can stand in the same folder. The folder being one does not join the acts. The person's name appearing in the protection order does not mean the residence authority wrote the same result.
A measure written in the protection order is not looked for in the end box of the residence writing. The end in the residence writing is not copied as the period of the protection order. Which authority kept which paper is taken from the paper's own heading. If there is no heading, an authority is not chosen either. If a police or court record stands in the file, that record belongs to the protection paper. The date of the residence card is not carried from that record. Service of the order and delivery of the card are separate annotations. One annotation does not start the period of the other.
The method of the violence, a description of injury, and how the event grew are not on this page. What is read is that the protection paper in hand stands apart from the residence paper. If a medical report is in the file, the report may be an annex of the protection record. The report does not write the residence period. The result of the report does not change the residence type either. While there is no report, the event is not described from this text.
The protection process is not opened on this page
Where an application for a protection order is made, which measure is asked for, and how a breach is entered are not rewritten under this heading. The reader follows that frame from the text on a protection order against violence. This page only says that that record will be kept apart from the residence card. The list of measures, the period, and the result of a breach stay in that writing. They are not carried here.
Entry of the marriage in the register is a separate line, and it is in the writing on the civil-registry record of a marriage with a foreigner. The validity in Turkey of a marriage celebrated abroad is under a separate heading. A valid marriage record is neither a protection order nor the period of the residence card. Erasure of the marriage line does not lift the protection record of itself either. The two lines are at two authorities.
If there is a divorce or separation writing, the writing belongs to family law. The writing does not write the end of the residence card from this page. If there is no residence sentence in the writing, a sentence is not added. A decision on custody of a child is not a copy of the protection record either. If the decision says with whom the child will stay, it says that much. It does not extend the foreign spouse's card.
The person's residence file is not the spouse's petition
If the residence writing was drawn up in a person's name, the result is read for that person. The spouse's own application does not change the date on the foreign spouse's card of itself. If there is a petition that the spouse withdrew consent, the petition is not put in place of the residence result. The result is looked for in the writing of the residence authority. While there is no writing, the petition is not treated as having extended or ended the card. A protection order attached to the petition is not renamed as a residence writing.
Refusal of a citizenship application is not the subject of this separation. The refusal stands under refusal of a citizenship application. The reason for refusal does not stick of itself to the protection record or to the residence card. Each notice is read from its own service annotation. If there is no annotation, a day is not invented. A pending citizenship file does not stop the end of the card either. A waiting sentence does not write a period into the residence box.
The foreign spouse makes the complaint in their own name. If the spouse's representative or family gave a petition, the power of attorney or the representation line is looked for in the file. If there is no line, someone else's petition is not treated as the person's residence result. If there is an interpreter minute, the minute is the record of what was said. The minute is not the text of the residence card.
The marriage register does not write the date of the card
The marriage appearing in the register does not show that family residence continues. The register stamp does not put a date in the end box of the card. If the marriage was never entered in the register, the residence card in hand is not treated as absent either. The card is read from its own type line. If the type line does not say family residence, this text does not correct the type as family residence. A correction is read only if it is in the administration's writing.
The document of a ceremony celebrated abroad is not described on this page as evidence of the protection order. The document is the subject of the writing on validity of the marriage. If the document and the protection record stand in the same file, each is read from its own heading. One does not carry the date of the other. If the date line is empty, a date is not added.
Two authorities carry two headings
The authority that keeps the protection record and the authority that draws up the residence writing are separated from the letterheads of the papers. Even if the letterheads are the same, if the headings differ there are two acts. If the letterhead cannot be read, an authority is not chosen. If the address where the person stays appears separately in the protection writing and on the residence card, the two addresses are two lines. The addresses being the same does not join the acts. If an address is empty, the address is not completed from the other paper.
This text does not write a method of compulsion or of reply against the person who used the violence. What is read is that the records are separate. A result of staying is not promised. That the card will be renewed is not promised either. The frame is on the international law page. The basis of the residence record is the text of Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection. If there is no article number in the writing, a number is not added. A result of staying is not built before the two records are placed side by side. The contact page stands for reading the writings together.
If a copy of the protection order and a copy of the residence card stand in the same envelope, the envelope does not create a single act. If the authority on the copy and the authority that issued the card differ, each is on its own letterhead. If the person's statement passed as a sentence in the protection minute, the sentence stays there. If the statement does not say that the residence period was extended, a period is not added. If the spouse's counter-statement is a separate minute, that minute is not a residence writing either. If the two statements conflict, the conflict is read by separating which minute carries which sentence. The conflict does not put a date in the end box of the card.
The child's residence document is separate from the foreign spouse's card. If the child has no document, the spouse's card is not treated as belonging to the child. If there is an end on the child's document, the end is on that document. The spouse's protection record does not extend the child's card of itself. A school or health record is not a residence period either. These papers may carry a trace of the place where the person stays. The residence result is in the residence writing. While there is no writing, the protection order does not announce a result of staying in the country.
If there is a writing about a shelter or another place of stay, the writing is an address record. The writing does not change the type of the card. If the address differs from the address on the residence card, the difference is left. The difference does not mean the permit has ended. Whether the permit continues is on the period line of the card or of the residence writing.
Conclusion
Family residence is not assumed to be locked to the consent of the spouse who used the violence. The protection record and the residence record are read apart. The marriage register does not write the date of the card. The period is on the residence document. The protection steps and the method of the violence are not here.