In short
An attachment annotation on the title does not mean the immovable was sold or auctioned. The line in the declarations column shows that the notice of attachment was entered on that immovable. The sale notice and the auction record are separate documents. While the annotation stands, a notice may never have gone out.
What attachment of an immovable locks on the title is under attachment of an immovable. This text is not a summary of that guide. Whether the owner's own transfer erases the annotation is under can an attached immovable be sold. Here only the annotation line and the sale notice are separated. A line on a vehicle registration is not a copy of this immovable record either. The vehicle record is under attachment of a vehicle.
What the declarations column writes
The attachment line in the declarations column of the title record shows the attachment the enforcement office notified. On the line, the office, the file, and the date are looked for. This line does not carry an auction date, an appraised value, or a buyer's name. While these three are absent, the line is not read as if a sale had been made. The type of the line also comes out of the record's own name. Another annotation is not a copy of the attachment line. If the line has only the word attachment, this word is not turned into a sentence that the auction has ended.
The wrong block, parcel, or owner's name does not build the result that this place was sold. It is not said the attachment was written on this stone before the party to the proceedings and the owner on the title match. An owner who does not match does not paste another immovable's annotation onto this record. A line that fell for a share is not the auction of the whole of the immovable. Which share was written is read from the declarations column. If there is no share line, it is not said the whole was sold. The measure of the share is not written into this text either. If the measure stands on the share line on the title, it is read from there. If it does not stand, it is not said the whole was attached.
An independent-section number does not take another flat in the same building inside this annotation. If the annotation has no section, it is not said the whole of the building was sold either. Even if the block and the parcel are the same, the section line is read apart from the section on the notice. A condominium easement and condominium ownership are not the same sentence. Whichever the record writes, the annotation belongs to the place of that character. Before the character line is read, a land share is not taken for an independent section.
The sale notice is a separate paper
If a sale was asked, the notice is a text other than the annotation. On the notice, the block and the parcel of the immovable, the date of the sale, and which file the sale came out of are looked for. If the text of the notice is not in the file or in the notice record, the annotation is not put in place of the notice. If the date is not written on the notice, it is not added to this text. The period itself is not here either. That the notice appears in a newspaper or in an electronic medium does not mean it was entered in the declarations column. The two places are kept apart.
The auction record is separate from the notice too. That a notice went out does not mean the auction has ended. While there is no record, registration in the buyer's name is not assumed. The annotation line is not a summary of the record. The debtor does not accept that the house was sold because they saw an attachment in the declarations column. Whether it was sold is read by setting the notice and the record beside the annotation. If the record has a buyer, this name is read from the record, not from the attachment line in the declarations column. If the block and the parcel of the record and of the annotation differ, the record is not written onto this place.
Even if an auction appears to have been held, registration is completed with the record and the office's writing. If the registration has not yet turned to the buyer's name, the annotation does not speak by itself as if the sale had ended, or as if it had not ended. The documents that speak are the notice, the record, and the current title record. If a route was opened for annulment of the auction, the papers of that route are also separate from the record. This text does not build that route. The separation it builds is that the annotation line will not be put in place of the record.
While the annotation stands, there may be no auction
An attachment annotation may stand on the title for a long time without a request for sale being made. An annotation that stands is not a record that the auction was silently completed. The creditor may not have asked for a sale. Even if they asked, the notice and the auction are separate steps. The date of the annotation is not read as the auction date. That the annotation is old does not build the result that the sale has long passed either. How long it lasted is not written into this text.
An electronic sale notice is not the title line itself either. While there is no notice record on the portal or in the file, the declarations column is not treated as a notice. If there is a record, the block, the parcel, and the merits should be the same as the place on the annotation. The notice of another file is not pasted onto this parcel. More than one attachment line does not mean more than one auction was held. Each line is read with its own file. The order of the lines does not finish, in this text, who receives what. The order is read with the attachment dates in the file and with the sale papers if there are any. If there are no papers, an order is not invented.
The file dropping from being processed does not make the annotation a sale notice either, and it does not erase the annotation by itself. The condition of dropping from being processed is under a file that dropped from being processed. The sentence on the screen does not stand in for the declarations column. That the screen says there is no sale does not have an earlier notice treated as absent either. If a notice went out, its text is looked for in the file. If there is no text, the annotation is not completed as if there were a notice.
A change of owner is not an auction record
If the owner's name has changed on the title, this change does not stand in for the auction record. The transfer may be the owner's own act. An enforcement sale wants a notice and an auction record. The two are not the same sentence. The annotation may still stand after the transfer. An annotation that stands is not a statement that there was never a sale either. What it is is not built before the notice, the record, and the new owner line on the title are read separately. The new owner is compared with the name on the record before being taken for the buyer. If there is no name, the transfer is not treated as an enforcement sale.
While the buyer's name is not on the notice, the attachment in the declarations column is not treated as a sale in favour of a buyer. The annotation is not treated as lifted either before a release writing is entered on the title. Release is not a sale notice. The writing of lifting and the text of the notice are not mixed. Vacation of the immovable does not come out of this line either. Vacation is not born by the annotation being read as sold. If the person living there and the owner line differ, this difference does not mean an auction was held either. The difference is seen by reading the title record and the eviction papers, if there are any, separately. If there are no eviction papers, one does not leave from the annotation.
A registration by succession, or outside compulsory enforcement, is not an auction record either. If the new owner appears as an heir, this appearance does not write that the sale was made. If the heir's name is not the same as the buyer's name on the record, the two acts are not mixed. Even if it is the same, succession is not treated as an auction without the record.
A mortgage record is not a copy of the attachment line
A mortgage in the declarations column or the rights column is not the same as the attachment annotation. The mortgage stands on its own line as a right created in favour of a creditor. The attachment line is the enforcement office's notice. If the two stand side by side, the immovable may appear both mortgaged and attached. This appearance does not mean the auction was held. Which one's effect on the sale it is is not finished in this text as an order of distribution. The finishing is done with the record in the file and the title copy.
Release of the mortgage does not erase the attachment annotation. Release of the attachment does not lift the mortgage either. The debtor, on seeing that one line was lifted, does not treat the other as lifted too. The lifting of each line is seen by its own writing being entered on the title. A correction on the annotation is not read as if a sale had been made either. A correction annotation speaks of a block or an owner line that was written wrongly. A sale wants a notice and a record. If the title copy, the notice, and the record are in hand, the three are read side by side with contact. The reading does not make the annotation a sale notice, and it does not write the auction onto this place before the block and the parcel match.
If more than one immovable was attached in the same file, the block and the parcel of each are read separately. That a sale notice went out for one parcel does not make the declarations column of the other parcel an auction record. The other parcel's annotation is not treated as included in the sale before its name passes on the notice. Whether it passed is seen by setting the list in the text of the notice and the title copy side by side.
Conclusion
An attachment annotation on the title does not mean a sale was made. The declarations column and the sale notice are read apart. If the auction is not on the record, it is not completed from the annotation. The notice is not written onto this place before the block and the parcel match. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the provisions on attachment of an immovable of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.