In short
The answer to whether an instalment protocol drops the enforcement file is that the proceedings stay open if the text does not say waiver or closing. The creditor and the debtor may have written instalments outside for the balance. This paper is not an undertaking to pay at the enforcement office. An instalment day and interest are not in this text. A promise of collection is not built either.
Three papers do not stand in for one another
An undertaking given at the enforcement office is an act bound to a record. An instalment table the companies signed among themselves is not a copy of that record. Giving up the proceedings is a separate writing, and by which act the file closed is a separate record too. If the protocol says the file will be closed, that sentence may be read like a waiver. If it does not say it, closing is not assumed. The initials of an employee who has no authority to sign do not bind the company. Authority is read from the signature circular. Initials are not treated as a waiver by themselves, and the company stamp does not stand in for the authority document either.
A missed instalment, and the cover
The protocol may say that on delay the file will continue as it is, or that only the remaining instalments will be asked. A request for attachment is not built before it is read which sentence was written. An instalment that arrived is not memorised as the balance before it is entered on the account cover. A reduction or interest, if it is not in the protocol, is not written into the file separately, and this text sets no interest rate. The date of the protocol may be before or after service of the payment order. The order changes which paper cut the debt. The instalment day is read from the writing on the table. It is not frozen here. A missed instalment does not have the attachment treated as never having been placed.
Neighbouring acts do not close the protocol
The undertaking at the enforcement office sits under undertaking to pay. Giving up the proceedings sits under waiver. The closing of the file, under closing of the file, and collection outside the file, under collection outside the file, are separate records. That a partial payment does not lift the attachment is under partial payment. These five records do not make the instalment protocol outside into a waiver by itself. An instalment day and interest are not written into this separation either.
How the protocol is read
The text of the protocol, the record at the enforcement office, and the service annotation stand together. The three are not taken for a single document. An Ankara lawyer does not take the Çankaya address for the closing annotation of the enforcement office. The file is not treated as closed before the record at its office closes. The petition cannot write that the file has dropped while there is no waiver sentence. If an instalment day and interest are not in the protocol, they are not invented. The decision is not built before the account cover is seen.
If there is no waiver sentence, the file stays open
The protocol's instalment table does not stand in for the record at the enforcement office. The table is a contract signed outside. If the text does not expressly write that the file will be closed, or that the proceedings were given up, closing is not assumed. A missed instalment does not by itself bring the attachment to a state of never having been placed. A payment that arrived is not treated as deducted from the balance before it is entered on the account cover. The instalment day is read from whatever is written on the table, and this text does not freeze that day. If interest is not a sentence in the protocol, it is not written into the file separately. A rate is not invented.
The initials of a person who has no authority on the signature circular do not bind the company, and a stamp does not stand in for this authority document. The service annotation shows whether the protocol was signed before or after the payment order. The order changes which paper cut the debt. If the petition is written as if there were a waiver, a result that is not in the text has been built. The decision does not say the file has dropped before the record, the contract, and the cover are read together. A partial payment does not lift the attachment by itself. This separation stands apart from the question of whether the protocol is a waiver. A reduction that is not written in the protocol does not reflect on the account cover by itself. The creditor's oral account that they will hold the file is not a waiver document. If the receipt for the instalment the debtor deposited does not show which debt it was counted against, the balance is not memorised. The receipt, the contract, and the cover are set in the same date order. Before the order is built, it is not announced that the file has dropped. A signature put with unauthorised initials is not treated as a closing that binds the company if there is no authority sentence on the circular, and this lack is not completed afterwards by pressing a stamp.
Conclusion
An instalment protocol is not an undertaking and not a waiver. If the sentence that drops the file is not in the text, the proceedings stay open. An instalment day and interest are not frozen here. A payment that arrived is read from the cover. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy page. The basis is the text of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.