In short
Finality of the proceedings is becoming open to attachment, in enforcement without a judgment, by the objection not arriving or by the objection that arrived falling away. Attachment and sale do not begin by themselves. The creditor requests them separately. In a file under a judgment, the paper that arrives is an enforcement order, and it is not the name of the same threshold. The word on the screen does not stand in for the service by itself. A number of days is not added in this text.
How finality arises without a judgment
If the debtor does not object to the payment order in time, the proceedings may become final as to the claim that was not objected to. How many days the period is is read from the service entry on the order. This text does not rewrite the list of the first day. If the date of service is not on the document, finality is not assumed. If the service is irregular, the date of learning may change. It is not said that it had already become final before the debate of learning ends.
On a partial objection, the part that was objected to may stop. The part left outside the objection may become final. The sentence "I objected, nothing proceeds" is for this reason not true in every file. Which item stood in the objection petition is read. An item that is not in the petition is not treated as objected to. The separation is in the article on proceedings while the objection continues. The first face of the payment order is under the payment order.
If the objection is lifted later, or the annulment action is accepted, the part that stopped may also come to the stage of finality. Lifting and annulment are not the same action. The result of the two is not pasted onto attachment before the decision becomes final. The reasoning of the decision writes which item was lifted. Reasoning that does not write it is not treated as having opened the whole proceedings. The document also carries service of the lifting decision. While there is no service, a request for attachment may be early.
Enforcement under a judgment is not the same threshold
In enforcement under a judgment, an enforcement order goes to the debtor. An objection to the order does not produce the stopping result of a payment order without a judgment. What is done is in the article on the enforcement order. An appeal or a further appeal does not cut enforcement by itself. A stay wants a decision of postponement. While there is no decision, the file is not treated as having stopped by itself.
In a file under a judgment, the word finality is sometimes used in the sense of the judgment becoming final, and sometimes in the sense of the period of the enforcement order running out. Which meaning stands on the screen is separated from the annotation on the judgment and from service of the order. The two dates may not be the same day. The annotation on the judgment is not put in place of the service. If the annotation has no day, this text does not add a day. The date on the order does not by itself mean the sale was opened.
Finality does not open attachment by itself
Proceedings that have become final do not open the sale. A sale wants a separate request and an advance of costs. Finality does not turn the debt into a court judgment either. A claim that you are not the debtor is assessed separately by looking at its conditions. The action does not stop the attachment by itself in every file. How the request is written is under a request for attachment in a file that has become final. If there is no request petition, the office does not start the attachment by itself.
Finality does not mean the file has dropped from being processed either. If attachment is never requested, another period runs. That period is not the definition of this word, and a number is not made in this text. If the property is in another province, finality does not give birth to an attachment in that province by itself. The property is shown with a request and a letter. The letter is not a copy of the service papers.
The annotation of finality is not the cover of the file account. Interest that runs after the date of the annotation appears separately on the cover. Interest that does not appear is not treated as having arisen by itself from the word of the annotation. The request for attachment writes which property will be asked. Property that is not written is not treated as the whole estate having been attached. A request for sale is not a copy of the request for attachment either. If the two requests are melted in the same petition, which act was asked is erased. The service papers do not stand in for these two requests. The decision is not read as if the attachment had been opened while there is no request. The set of documents is built from the annotation, the service, and the request petition.
What is looked at in a file that has become final
The question of what it means that the proceedings have become final is built from the service and the objection papers, and this article does not treat the word on the screen as an attachment. An Ankara lawyer reads from the document that the office being in Çankaya does not change the competent enforcement office. This article does not add a number of days. This article does not paste the threshold under a judgment onto the period without a judgment.
Conclusion
Finality of the proceedings, without a judgment, is a period with no objection or the objection falling away. It does not start the attachment and the sale by themselves. Under a judgment, the enforcement order and postponement are a separate regime. The word on the screen is not interpreted without the service and the objection papers. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The official basis is the provisions on proceedings without a judgment and under a judgment of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.