In short
The question of how suretyship on a note is read separates whether a capacity is looked for apart from the principal debtor's signature. The capacity is read from the wording on the note and the place of the signature. No rate and no period are stated in this article. Not every signature is suretyship. A signature that stands as a witness cannot be pursued as a surety. A result is not built before the original of the note is seen.
An aval wording and a separate contract may not be the same paper. A contract that is not there is not treated as written by itself on the back of the note. A writing that is not so treated does not produce a rate either. A rate that is not produced is not added to the enforcement request.
The capacity in the text
If the wording "surety", "aval", or the like stands beside the signature, that wording is read. If the wording is absent, the place of the signature does not by itself choose a capacity. A capacity that was not chosen is not completed in the petition as joint and several. The record of a joint and several debtor explains the general face of liability together. The wording on the note is not accepted as a copy of that face.
Pursuing as a surety a person who wrote "witness" is to disregard the wording. A wording that is disregarded is not converted in this text into a period. If a period is written on the note or on the service, it is read from there. If it is not written, it is not invented. A period that was not invented is not the width of the surety's debt either.
Aval and a contract
An aval on a negotiable instrument may be debated differently from a separate contract of suretyship. The difference is seen when the two documents are set side by side. If there is a contract, the scope is in that text. If there is no contract, the absence does not erase the aval sentence of the note. A sentence that is not erased is not widened as if a contract were there either.
A scope that is not widened does not carry a rate. A scope that does not carry one is not written as a percentage. There is no percentage in this article. A percentage that is not there does not run by itself onto the cover calculation either. The running is looked for when the note, the contract, and the enforcement request stand.
Whom the enforcement goes to
The creditor may pursue the principal debtor and the surety together or separately. A separate pursuit is spoken of if the capacity of surety is visible on the note. If it is not visible, a surety line is not invented. A line that was not invented is not written in the debtor box of enforcement special to negotiable instruments. A promissory-note claim is the general face of collection. What is read here is not the door of collection, but whether the capacity of surety stands in the text.
If service went to the person written as surety, to whom the writing that went arrived is read from the annotation. If there is no annotation, arrival is not assumed. An arrival that was not assumed is not treated as having started the period. A period that is not so treated is not in this text either. If the decision has written the surety as debtor, the limit is in the text of the decision. Without a decision, the enforcement calculation is not a final judgment of suretyship.
The signature and a blank note
An objection to the surety's signature sits in the signature objection record. The objection should mark which signature is in debate. Without a mark, all the signatures on the note are not disregarded. Later completion of a blank note is a separate risk. A blank does not mean the surety wording arose by itself. A wording that did not arise is the completing person's own sentence. If the sentence is not on the note, that absence is stated.
A payment document may show whether the surety or the principal debtor paid. If it does not show that, the payer is not assumed. A payment that was not assumed does not build a balance rate either. A rate that is not built is not written as a percentage on the petition.
If the signature of the person pursued as surety is not on the note, the absence is not completed from another contract. If there is a contract, that text is read separately. The text that is read does not by itself make the wording on the note an aval. A wording that does not do so does not carry a rate either. A rate that is not carried is not changed by a period either. A period that is not changed is not in this article. A period that is not there does not stand in for the day of arrival on the service annotation. A day that does not so stand is not written as a percentage on the petition. A percentage that is not written does not join the principal debtor's debt with the surety's debt. A debt that is not joined is not read as a single line on the cover calculation either. An assumption of a single line is not in this text. The assumption does not choose the place of the signature either.
Where suretyship is read from
This article does not add to the surety line a rate and a period that are not written on the note. An Ankara lawyer reads from the original of the note that the office being in Çankaya does not choose the office where the surety will be pursued. The competent authority is read from the note and the service. The office address does not change the capacity.
Conclusion
Suretyship on a note depends on the capacity in the text. Not every signature is suretyship. A rate and a period are not frozen in this article. The frame is on the enforcement law page. The basis is the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.