In short
The record of a statement to the prosecutor is the official writing of what was said in the session, and a text signed without being read later produces argument. The paper carries identity, capacity, the question, and the answer. An incomplete line does not fill itself later with a story told afterwards. No prison term is set out in this article. The record is not itself the court's judgment.
The face of the record
Identity, capacity, question and answer, a note of silence, and a document that was added may sit on the same face. An incomplete line produces argument at the prosecution stage. That it may produce argument does not erase the statement for every incomplete line. What was written is read from the copy. If there is no copy, a sentence in memory is not treated as a document.
The general course of a statement at the prosecutor's office is in the statement at the prosecutor's office article. The defence-counsel line is in the defence counsel article. The difference between silence and a signature is in the silence article. If the three meet in the same session, the three lines are kept apart. The police paper is not a copy of this record.
Signing without reading
The record is checked by being read aloud or line by line. A sentence that is not understood is had corrected. If the correction is entered on the paper before the signature, the sentence that was entered is what speaks. If it is not entered, a later "I did not say that" conflicts with the written line. The conflict is not treated as absent. Even so, the conflict does not throw the record away in every file.
A refusal to sign is not silence. The two need separate notes. Without a note, it is not assumed that a refusal was made. The signature on a police record sits in the police record article. The two signatures are not read as meaning the same thing.
How a line is separated
It is looked at whether the question and the answer in the prosecutor's record belong to the same event. A signature placed without reading is not converted into a prison term. A prison term is not written. The address of the Çankaya office does not change the prosecutor's office where the statement was taken, or the competent court. The authority is read from the heading of the summons and of the record.
If an added photograph, document, or sketch is part of the record, it should stand in the annex. If it is not in the annex, the words "it was shown" are not by themselves an annex. The petition marks which line was written wrongly. The mark does not erase the opposing account.
The file that follows
The record enters the investigation papers. At the prosecution stage, or in an argument about non-prosecution, this paper is read again. Being read again does not by itself increase the weight of the sentence. Service is the face of the indictment, and it does not change the content of the record. The judgment is built from the line debated at the hearing.
If two copies conflict, the date and the page are compared. Without that comparison, it is not said that the record changed. If a line did change, that line is marked. Without a mark, the allegation stays as a general distrust.
Correcting a line
A correction may stand by the crossed-out word remaining readable, or by an added line. If the added line carries no initials, it is asked whether the addition was made in the session or afterwards. The question does not cause every line without initials to be disregarded. To disregard it, a conflicting second copy or a recording is needed. If neither exists, the existing line stands and the gap is stated separately. The gap that is stated does not erase the whole statement.
If the question that was asked and the answer that was written do not belong to the same event, that belonging is visible on the record. If it is not visible, the allegation that it was written wrongly marks which question was tied to which answer. Without a mark, the allegation stays general. An allegation that stays general does not erase the statement. A result of erasure is not in this article. The judgment is built when the marked line and the account at the hearing are set side by side.
If an added sketch or photograph is not mentioned in the body of the record, it is asked whether it counts as an annex. If it is mentioned, it is looked at whether it stands in the annex. If it is not in the annex, the thing mentioned is not treated as having been shown. That it is not treated as shown does not also erase the remaining sentences of the record. The remaining sentences stand with their own signature. A prison result does not come out of this comparison. What comes out is which line was read. The line that was read may also be a correction squeezed between the signature and the answer. If the correction remained readable, it stands as it is. If it was made unreadable, what was deleted is asked from the second copy. If there is no second copy, the deleted word is not invented. A word that was not invented is not written in place of the remaining signed sentences either.
Conclusion
The statement record is the written face of the statement. Signing it without reading produces argument. An Ankara lawyer does not take the signature and the statement as the same line. The frame is on the criminal law page. There is no promise of an outcome.
The basis is the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.