In short
What is read for a new sale after a sale falls through is that the note of failure and the attachment annotation stand apart. A sale that fell through does not mean the attachment lifted by itself. If there is no writing of a release, or that the attachment has lapsed, the attachment is not treated as lifted. A new sale does not open by itself as the next copy of the failed notice. An action to set the auction aside is not built in this text. A figure for a time limit is not written either.
What the note of failure writes
A record that the sale fell through, that the auction produced no result, or that no buyer came forward, writes that the notice did not end in a change of hands. That record does not stand in for an auction minute. If there is no minute, an auction is not treated as having happened. The record also does not write to whom the property passed. If there was no passing, title or the register may remain with the debtor. That it remains does not show that the attachment lifted. That the property remains with the debtor does not mean the debt was deleted either. The cover does not close without a collection annotation.
A sentence about a new sale is not made before the name of the annotation is read. If the name is that an auction was held, what is spoken of is a finished auction, not a failed sale. If the name is that the sale fell through, there is no change of hands. Melting the two names in the same petition confuses which paper is to be read. If the paper is not in the file, a name is not invented. "The auction produced no result" and "no buyer came forward" may not be the same sentence. Whichever wording the minute uses is the wording that is read. If the wording is absent, a reason is not added. Reasons such as no bid coming, a bid remaining insufficient, or a buyer withdrawing are not completed if they are not on the line.
If more than one asset is in the same notice, the failure is read as limited to the asset for which the minute writes it. If the limit is not written, it is not completed either as "all the assets failed" or as "none of them failed." The uncertainty is not closed. If movables and immovables sit on separate lines, each line is read from its own failure record. The failure of one does not erase the sale of the other.
The date of the failure annotation is not the date of the new sale. If no date is written, a date is not added. The date is not read as the moment the attachment lifted either. The office that wrote the annotation is read as it stands on the line. If the office name is absent, an office is not added. A failure annotation from another file number is not pasted onto this file.
The attachment may still stand after that record
The attachment minute and the register annotation may still stand in the file after the record that the sale fell through. If they stand, the attachment on the property has not been lifted by that record. The creditor or the debtor cannot say that the sale fell through and the attachment is over. To say it is over, a separate writing of a release, or that the attachment has lapsed, is looked for. If that writing is absent, the attachment is in place. An attachment that is in place may be the subject of a new sale line. Being in place does not mean the sale opened by itself. The sale is read from the request line, if that line exists.
How the line is written is in the request for sale after attachment article. This text does not build that petition. The writing does not turn the failed notice into a request petition. If the request does not stand separately, a new sale is not treated as having been asked for. The old request petition is not treated as renewed by itself after the failed notice. Renewal needs a new line. Leaving a photocopy of the old petition in the file is not a new request.
The attachment annotation at the land registry, in the traffic register, or in another register may still be visible after the failure record. That it is visible does not show that the sale was held. The lifting of the annotation is seen by a release writing. Without a release writing, a screenshot is not treated as having deleted the annotation. If there is more than one attachment, each annotation is separate. A failed sale of one asset does not lift the annotation on another asset. If belonging is not written, belonging is not completed.
A message from the creditor that the sale fell through and that they also lifted the attachment is not a release. If the message has not been entered in the file, it has no effect. A postponement that has been entered is not a release writing either. The scope of the postponement is in the annotation's own sentence. If that sentence is absent, the scope is not widened. The debtor cannot put a screenshot of the message in as a release document.
A new sale is not a copy of the old notice
The date of the failed notice is not the notice of the new sale. A new notice needs a new annotation. Leaving the old notice on the board or on a list does not count as a new sale having been held. The failed notice does not by itself open the next auction. The new sale record is looked for separately in the file. If the record is absent, it is not said that the sale was renewed. If the asset's name is missing from the new notice, the asset is not completed from the old notice. The figure on the old notice is not the figure of the new notice. If no figure is written, a figure is not added. A fraction is not added either.
What the electronic setting is appears under electronic sale. The setting does not turn a failed sale into a release of the attachment. An old notice still sitting on the screen is not a new sale line. If the screen record and the office annotation conflict, the annotation is read. Without the annotation, the screen is not treated as having renewed the sale. The name of the channel does not change the wording of the failure annotation. If the two channels carry two different wordings, both are read. One is not chosen and the other treated as absent.
If it is written to whom the new notice was served, that record is read. If it is not written, service is not assumed. Having been served does not mean the attachment lifted. Not having been served does not turn the old notice into the new notice either. The service paper does not stand in for the text of the notice. Even if the two arrive in the same envelope, they are not taken as the same line.
If there is more than one creditor, one creditor's not asking for a new sale does not erase another request that stands in the file. If the request annotation writes which creditor it belongs to, that name is read. If it does not, belonging is not completed. Belonging that was not completed does not make the sentence that all requests fell through.
An action to set the auction aside is not the name of this failure
Setting an auction aside after the auction is completed is under setting the auction aside. The falling through of a sale is not the setting aside of a completed auction. If there is an auction minute, this page does not write the petition to set that minute aside. If there is no minute, a setting aside is not assumed either. The failure annotation is not read as a decision setting the auction aside. If a decision stands separately, the decision is read from its own heading. If the heading is that the sale fell through, there is no change of hands. If the heading is that the auction was set aside, the door that is read changes. This text does not build the petition for that door.
A record that no buyer came forward may not be the same as a record that the buyer did not pay in the money. If there is a receipt or an annotation that the money was not paid in, that annotation is read. If there is not, default is not assumed. Even if default is not assumed, the failure annotation does not erase the debt. Without an auction minute, a buyer's name is not added either. If a name is there, the name does not mean that title passed. Passage of title is seen by the registration record. If the record is absent, there is no passage.
A payment document does not turn a failed sale into a release
Paying the debt before the sale is not the result of a sale that fell through. Payment is under paying the debt before the sale. Without a payment document, the debt is not deleted because the sale fell through. Even if the document exists, the attachment annotation is not treated as lifted before the document is annotated. If the two annotations are not side by side, one does not erase the other. If the document writes an amount, that amount is read. If it does not, an amount is not added. A partial document does not close the whole cover. If the cover has no collection annotation, the balance remains.
A release is not read as another name for the failure annotation. If there is a release, its scope is in its own sentence. If the sentence is absent, the scope is not widened. A creditor's oral sentence "I withdrew" has no effect if it has not been entered in the file. A withdrawal that has been entered is read as limited to the asset it relates to. If there is no limit, it is not said that all the assets were freed.
If no buyer's name is written in the failed sale, a name is not added. Even if a name is written, the name does not mean that title passed to that person. Passage is looked for separately by a registration or delivery record. If the record is absent, the property may have remained with the debtor. That it remained does not erase the attachment annotation. If a line about the buyer's deposit is not in the failure annotation, a deposit is not produced from this failure. If the deposit is on a separate receipt, the receipt is read from its own heading. If there is no heading, the receipt is not treated as an annex of the failure annotation.
If there are two failure records for the same asset, each record is tied to its own notice. If the tie is not written, the two records are not joined as a single sale. One is not the release of the other. If a new sale has been requested, the request is written on a separate line, not on top of the failure record. If a crossing-out has been written on top, the crossing-out is read. If there is no crossing-out, the failure record stands.
When a copy of the file is read, the office details are on the contact page. Without the copy, a guess that the attachment lifted, or that a new sale opened, is not written. A guess is not an annotation.
Conclusion
A sale that fell through is not a release of the attachment annotation. A new sale needs a new notice line. An action to set the auction aside is not built in this body. A figure for a time limit is not written. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004 on a sale that does not conclude.