In short
A wrong name of a tumour is not the report coming out late. What is read is the name in the sentence of the diagnosis. This writing separates from the file which name the pathology report gave to which tissue. On which day the report was written is in the record delay of a pathology report. The piece belonging to another person is in the record a mixed sample. The definition of the consent form and the general list of an application to the hospital are not repeated here. An amount of compensation and the name of a compulsory centre are not written.
Which name the line of diagnosis carries
If the diagnosis section of the report carries the organ and the name of the lesion, that name is read. The clinical diagnosis on the request paper is not the short name of the pathology sentence. A clinician may have written a preliminary diagnosis, and the pathology may have written another name. If the two conflict, both stay in the file. The conflict is not closed by erasing one of them. A free sentence in the comment, the explanation or the epicrisis is not pasted in the place of the line of diagnosis. The line of diagnosis stands separately. The comment stands separately.
Article 11 of the Patient Rights Regulation asks that the diagnosis conform to the requirements of modern medical knowledge and technology. A diagnosis contrary to the principles of the practice of medicine, or of a misleading character, may not be made. The provision does not by itself announce every report in hand as wrong. The wrongness is read from the conflict of the name in the file with the later correction or with the clinical record. When there is no conflict, the name is not changed by a sentence that is remembered. If the name of the person who signed the report is on the printout, that name is read. If the signature box is empty, the name is not completed.
If the organ written on the request paper and the tissue examined in the report differ, the difference is marked. The difference does not by itself tie it as a ruling that the name is wrong. Which piece was tied to which report is seen from the protocol number, if it stands. If there is no number, the absence is written separately. The absence does not carry the name of a neighbouring report into this file.
The first sentence and the writing of correction
If there is an additional report, a correction or a later note, the first sentence of diagnosis is not treated as erased. The two texts stand side by side. Whichever date is earlier, that date does not mean that the later one made the first one absent. If it is written in the clinical note which intervention began after which sentence, that note speaks. If the note says only that the report arrived, which name was taken as the basis cannot be read. A place that cannot be read is not filled as if there were a new name.
A short preliminary assessment of the same tissue and the final report are two separate sentences as well. The preliminary assessment is not joined as a draft of the final report. If there is no final report, the absence is written separately. The final report changes the preliminary sentence only if it changes it in its own text. If it does not change it, the two names stay in the file. The patient keeps the first copy in their hand and the later copy in the same envelope. If one is lost, the loss does not mean that the other is correct.
A new report does not build a compulsory centre
Article 17 of the regulation asks for the completion, the explanation and the correction of medical information in the record that is incomplete, uncertain or erroneous. The right also covers asking for a new report about the state of health to be drawn up at the same establishment or at another. The sentence does not carry the name of a particular pathology centre. The patient looks at whether there is a note of another physician in the file. If there is no note, an institution is not invented. A copy may be asked for, under Article 16, by the patient, their attorney or their legal representative. The copy does not correct the sentence of diagnosis by itself. The correction appears when a corrected or a new report comes out.
Article 18 writes that the patient may ask a second opinion about the state of health from another physician, with the same complaint. The request appears by a note that stands in the file. If there is no note, a second opinion is not treated as having been made. The name of a laboratory is not added to this text in order for it to be treated as made. A second look may also write differently without announcing the first sentence as false. The difference stands in the petition as two sentences. It is not summarised as if there were a single name. The summary does not build an item of compensation either.
What the paper of consent is is in the writing informed consent. The pathology sentence does not enter the consent form by itself. A form signed before the procedure is not treated as having changed the name the report wrote later. The general list of applications to be made to the hospital is in the writing patient rights. The line of diagnosis is not read as an item of that list. The application does not repeat the list without saying which name of which report it disputes.
A report that is late and a piece that was mixed
The report being written late does not mean that the name is wrong. A correct name that came out late is the subject of the record of delay. What is read here is the name itself. If the identity of the piece shows another patient, the subject moves to the mixing. If the identity is the same, the subject stays in the sentence of diagnosis. If the two events join in one person, they still stand on a separate line. A barcode, a name and a protocol number are for the identity. The line of diagnosis is not put in the place of these numbers. If the number is missing, the gap is not completed as if there were a name of a tumour.
The frame of the activity of medicine is in the text of Law No. 1219. The statute does not carry a list for the name of a tumour. The list is not put in the place of the line of diagnosis of the report. The name in another patient's report does not become an example for this file because the organ is similar. A foreign report brought as an example does not change the sentence in hand.
Which sentence the treatment rests on
If a clinical note, a decision of an operation or a plan of treatment rests on a sentence of diagnosis, that sentence is marked. If the basis is not written, it is not assumed that the intervention rested on the later correction. If there is time between the first name and the procedure, the time is read from the dates in the file. If there is no date, an order is not invented. The patient keeps together the copy of the first report, the correction if there is one, and the request paper. If the name differs on one of the copies, the difference is not completed from a faint place on the photocopy. The faint place is written as not being readable.
The drug name or the scheme of the plan of treatment is not on this page. If the plan writes which pathology sentence it mentions, that mention is read. If there is no mention, the plan is not treated as having chosen the pathology name by itself. A name that was not chosen does not stand in the petition as if it were there.
An empty line of diagnosis
If the line of diagnosis is empty, the gap is not filled with the general diagnosis in the examination note. The patient asks for a copy of the report. If the copy is empty as well, the name is not built by an oral account. If the oral account and the paper conflict, the conflict is the emptiness of the line. The gap does not produce an item of compensation either. If the name of the institution's internal pathology unit is written on the printout, that name is read. If it is not written, the name is not added. A name that is added does not have changed the place that made the examination.
If the report carries a sentence such as "insufficient for a diagnosis", or a similar sentence, that sentence is not a name of a tumour. If the sentence proposed a new piece or a new examination, the proposal stays on its own line. The proposal is not read as an examination at a second centre that was made. Whether it was made is understood from the later printout. If there is no printout, the examination is not assumed.
The request paper may carry the place the piece was taken, the clinical information and the earlier procedure. These lines do not stand in for the sentence of diagnosis. If the clinical information is empty, the gap is not filled backwards from the name of the report. If the place the piece was taken does not match the organ in the report, the mismatch is marked. The mismatch is not an identity mix by itself either. If the identity numbers are the same, the subject is still the name of the diagnosis. If the numbers differ, the subject moves to the record of the mixing.
If the report was written in the name of the physician who requested it, that name is read. If there is no name, and the report does not say to whom it was delivered, delivery is not assumed. If there is an annotation of delivery, the date is read. If there is no annotation, the patient is not treated as never having seen the report. Not seeing it is read only if there is a record that writes this. If one of two copies stands with the patient and one in the file, the two are compared. If one carries a missing page, the missing page is not completed as if there were a full text.
The patient separates the headings "preliminary diagnosis" and "final diagnosis". If the two are on the same page, both are read. If only one is there, the other is written as absent. A heading that is absent is not built by being chosen from the paragraph of the comment. If the comment counts possible names, the names that are counted are not the line of diagnosis. If the line of diagnosis does not stand separately, a diagnosis is not treated as having been made.
An office in Çankaya does not choose the authority the file will go to.
Conclusion
If a pathology diagnosis comes out wrong, what is read is the sentence in which the name of the tumour is written. The first report, the correction and the clinical basis stand side by side. A report that is late and a piece that was mixed are other records. A compulsory second centre is not in this text. The frame is on the page health law. The sentences in hand may be placed side by side separately by the contact path. The basis is Articles 11, 16, 17 and 18 of the Patient Rights Regulation.