In short
If a private hospital asks for recourse from the physician, the place that is read is the sentence of recourse in the contract between the hospital and the physician. This sentence is separate from the insurer's writing of recourse. The sentence says in which event the hospital turns to the physician. If there is no sentence, the absence is not filled from the policy. The patient's writing of complaint is not a copy of this contract. An amount and a period are not in this text.
This writing answers the sentence of recourse in the contract. It does not answer the patient's path against the private hospital. That path stands in the record a medical error in a private hospital. The writing by which the insurer turns to the physician is not put in the place of this sentence either.
The sentence of recourse in the contract
The document that is read is the contract the physician signed with the hospital. The sentence may not say "recourse". It may also stand as "collection from the physician of the price the hospital paid" or "passing the damage on to the physician". What is looked for is the line that says after which event the hospital turns to the physician. Whether the line writes after payment, or while the claim is still at the hospital, that separation is read.
If there is no line, the contract is left as not silently carrying a provision of recourse. The gap that is left is not completed from a heading in the insurance policy. The definition of the policy is in the record compulsory insurance. The definition is not an article of the hospital contract. The limit of cover and the amount of the premium are not written into the gap of the contract either.
The sentence may have been written very widely. A line such as "every kind of damage is taken from the physician" shows its width. The width does not build the amount by itself. The width does not rule on this page that the sentence is valid or invalid either. The ruling is built separately by reading the contract in hand and the line of the statute side by side. This page does not give that ruling in advance. A ruling that is not given is not a promise that the sentence will be disregarded either. If the sentence stands in the contract, it stands.
The event the sentence is tied to is read as well. Is the event a particular patient and a particular procedure, or the whole of the physician's work at the hospital. If it is written as the whole of the work, the writing stands that way. If it is written as a particular procedure, another day is not added to that sentence. A day that is not added is not carried from the patient's petition of complaint.
The place that separates from the insurer's recourse
The insurer's writing recounts whether the loss the company paid turns back to the physician. The sentence of the hospital contract recounts whether the hospital turns to the physician for the item it paid itself, or undertook to pay. The addressee, the cause and the basis of the two papers are separate. One is not pasted into the file like the annex of the other.
Whom the patient sued is in the record against whom it is opened. The names of the items are in the record the items of compensation. A figure is not written into this record. The writing the hospital sent to the physician is not a receipt that that figure became final. If there is a receipt, the receipt must show separately which event the sentence of the contract was tied to. If it does not show it, a tie is not invented.
The writing of recourse the insurer sent to the physician is not read like an annex of this contract. If the insurer shows a cause in the general conditions, that writing is on its own paper. If the hospital shows the sentence in the contract, the basis is the contract. The two may have come in the same week. Coming in the same week does not make the two bases one sentence. The physician separates which envelope rests on which paper. If there is an amount on the envelope, the amount is not written here.
The hospital may also write to the physician before it has made the payment. If the writing says "we paid, we turned", the claim of payment is read. If the writing says "if we pay later, we will take it", this is not a receipt of a payment that happened. If the two sentences are mixed, the mixed writing is not corrected as a payment that happened. The correction is on the receipt or on the line of the contract. If there is no receipt, payment is not assumed. A payment that is not assumed does not erase the sentence of the contract either.
An employee, or another contract
The contract writes whether the physician is a paid employee or is bound under another title. An operative part of the statute is not pasted before the line of the title is read. Article 66 of the Turkish Code of Obligations writes that a person who employs another may, for the compensation they paid, have recourse against the employee who caused the damage only to the extent the employee is personally liable. This measure is read if the employment relation enters this article. The measure is not turned into a rate or into lira in this text.
Article 62 of the same code writes that, among those who are jointly and severally liable for the same damage, the one who paid more than their own share may turn to the other for this excess. The share is read together with the weight of the fault and the intensity of the danger. The share is not written into the contract as a single percentage. A percentage is not in this text. If the physician does not carry the capacity of employee, the last sentence of Article 66 is not copied onto that contract by itself. Then too, the place that is read is the sentence itself in the contract.
A payroll, a list of shifts or a paper such as rent of a room does not by itself build the line of the title. The title that is built is how the contract names the physician. The naming may be "consultant", "partner of a company" or another capacity. If the capacity brings Article 66 by itself, it brings it. If it does not bring it, it does not. This page does not choose a capacity before seeing the contract in hand. A capacity that is not chosen does not mean that the sentence of recourse is disregarded either. If the sentence stands, the sentence is read. An operative part of the statute is placed beside it only if the contract enters that relation.
If the hospital's writing says to the physician's insurance "you are the principal debtor", this sentence does not stand in for the definition of the policy. The policy is on the insurer's paper. The hospital's internal writing is not the insurer's cause of recourse. If the two papers stand in front of the physician, both stand. One does not erase the other. The limit and the premium are not written again.
The patient's writing of complaint is not this contract
The patient's application at the private hospital is a separate text that recounts the record, the organisation and the path of compensation. That text does not carry the internal sentence between the hospital and the physician. A petition of complaint is not put in the place of the sentence of recourse. The sentence having been written widely does not build a ruling of validity on this page. The ruling is built by reading the contract in hand and the line of the statute side by side. This page does not give that ruling in advance.
Changing the report, or having an expert write a result, is not the reading of this sentence either. The document that is read is the signed contract and the writing the hospital relies on. A sentence of fault in the report does not fill the line of recourse of the contract by itself. The filling is read if there is a sentence in the contract tied to that report or to that act. If there is no sentence, the report is not turned into an article of the contract. A report that is not turned is not counted as absent either. The report stands in its own file. A promise of disregarding it is not in this text.
If the patient's complaint was added to the hospital's writing, the annex is the complaint itself. The annex is not put in the place of the article of the contract. The amount in the complaint is not carried into the contract either. An amount that is not carried does not require the physician not to read the writing. What is read is which sentence of the contract the annex was tied to. If the tie is not in the writing, a tie is not invented.
More than one contract may stand in front of the physician. The main text, an additional protocol, a shift, or a separate paper about a particular unit. Whichever of these the sentence of recourse is in, that paper is read. If there is no sentence on the other paper, the absence is not copied from the paper that has the sentence. An absence that is not copied does not erase the paper that has the sentence either. If the dates of signature differ, each paper stays on its own date. If a later protocol does not write that it changed the earlier one, it is not treated as having changed it. If it wrote it, the field it wrote is read. A sentence that remained outside the field stands.
If the sentence says "after the payment was made", a paper that shows the payment is looked for in the annex of the writing. If there is no paper, the payment is not assumed from the width of the sentence. If the sentence says "when the claim reaches the hospital", this is not a receipt of an amount that was paid. If the two accounts stand side by side in the same contract, both are read. One does not build the amount of the other. An amount, a premium and a limit of cover are not written beside this separation. A figure that is not written does not mean the contract will not be read. What is read is the line that says in which event the hospital turns to the physician.
Where the contract is read from
The sentence of recourse is separated from the insurance writing and from the text of the patient's complaint. An operative part of the statute is not pasted before the line of the title is read. A rate, a limit and a period are not written. An office in Çankaya does not change the hospital that is a party to the contract.
Conclusion
The recourse a private hospital asks from the physician is read from the sentence in the contract. The sentence is separate from the insurer's recourse. The patient's writing of complaint is not a copy of this sentence. If there is a relation of employing a person, the statute limits the recourse to the measure for which the employee is personally liable. The measure, a rate and a period are not in this text. The frame is on the page health law. The contact path is open for the sentence in the contract. The basis is Article 66 and Article 62 of Turkish Code of Obligations No. 6098.