Enforcement & bankruptcy · Legal information

What Does the Vehicle Record Show When Motor Vehicle Tax Becomes an Attachment?

Author · Av. Ayşenur Konar, Avukat

Published ·

In short

The trace of a motor-vehicle-tax debt on the vehicle record is not a general attachment of a vehicle. What is read on the register is the institution that placed the annotation and the type of the debt. If the line writes the tax office and motor vehicle tax, the record is that public claim entered on the vehicle. This line is not called a general attachment when there is no enforcement-file number. A sale, a prohibition of transfer or a block on an account is not added from here if it is not in the sentence of the register. An amount and a rate are not in this article.

The institution and the type of debt on the register printout

Each line on the traffic-registration printout carries the name of the institution that entered the annotation and, if possible, the type of the debt. If the name is the tax office and the type is motor vehicle tax, the trace is the record of the public claim on the vehicle. This trace is not read as the enforcement office's regime of seizure or of preservation. That regime stands under attachment of a vehicle. What is built here is whom the register line belongs to.

If there is no office name at the top of the printout and the institution is also empty on the line, motor vehicle tax is not assumed. The plate appearing as "restricted" in the system does not stand in for the name of the institution. If the word restriction does not write which office entered it for which debt, the type is not completed. The registration information on the front of the licence is not put in the place of the list of annotations on the back, or in the query. If the list of annotations is not in hand, a photocopy of the licence is not treated as having shown the attachment.

In a public debt, the authority is the office in the heading of the paper. If the register writes the tax office, the authority is that office. Law No. 6183 on the Procedure for Collection of Public Receivables does not make this line the payment order of an enforcement office. The two procedures are not written into the same sentence of an annotation. A traffic-fine line, a premium line and a motor-vehicle-tax line are not joined in a single file as ordinary enforcement without a judgment either.

The holder of the licence and the debtor's name

The person who appears on the licence and the debtor on the tax writing do not have to be the same. The two names are read side by side. If the name of the licence holder is not on the annotation line, the attachment is not treated as entered on that vehicle. If the name of the licence holder is not on the debtor line, the tax writing does not pass by itself to the person on the licence. If the line is empty, the plate is not declared attached.

If the vehicle was sold, the sale document and the date of the annotation should stand side by side. If the date is not in the writing, the transfer is not completed as before or after the annotation. A notarial sale does not change the name of the institution on the register. The new owner is not made the debtor while they are not on the annotation line. The former owner is not counted as the debtor, by saying the plate was with me, if the annotation is not standing in their name. If it is a company vehicle, the trade name is looked for both on the licence and on the annotation line. An employee who is the driver is not written as the debtor if the trade name is not standing. Use inside the family does not change the holder of the registration.

The sentence of the annotation is not a notice of sale

The annotation may stand in front of a transfer. Whether it does is read from the restriction sentence on the register. Counting every record as a prohibition of sale when there is no restriction sentence confuses the annotation with a notice. A notice of sale is a separate paper. If the place, the day and the file are not in the notice, the sale is not assumed to have started. This article does not add a day that is not written in the notice. The sale announcement of an enforcement office is not treated as hidden inside the annotation of the tax office. If the announcement is not in hand, it is not said that there is an announcement.

During a transfer, the notary or the registration unit may see the annotation. Seeing it does not by itself build the result that the sale was made at that moment, or could not be made. The result is read from the text of the restriction sentence. If the sentence does not say a transfer cannot be made, this article does not produce that prohibition. If the sentence only shows the record of the debt, the record is not a notice of sale. An annotation of a pledge or of another right is not renamed as motor vehicle tax either. If the type is separate, the lines stay separate.

More than one line on the same vehicle

If there is more than one line, the institution and the type of debt of each line are read separately. A tax line and an enforcement-file line are not joined as a single annotation. If one line has an office name and the other has an enforcement-file number, there are two records. A line without a number is not made an annex of the line with a number. If the type is not written, it is not filled in as motor vehicle tax. A line belonging to a traffic fine is not read in the place of the tax type. If the fine paper is not an annex of this register printout, similarity of the plate does not create a match.

If the same person has two plates, the printout of each plate is separate. A tax line on one plate is not copied onto the other plate. If the plate is empty on the printout, the line is not written onto the plate of the licence in hand. A trailer, or another class, is not chosen from here if it is not written on the line. The class does not change the type of the annotation. The type is read from the name of the institution and from the sentence of the debt. The plate on an insurance policy, or the chassis on an expert report, does not stand in for the register line. If the chassis number is not on the printout, the chassis does not create a match.

An invoice, a service slip or an expert report is not the basis of the tax annotation. A repair price does not explain the public line on the vehicle record. The general order of an attachment in an enforcement file is in how an attachment happens. That order is not pasted onto the tax-office annotation as ordinary enforcement without a judgment. The coming off of the annotation is not announced from this order either. The coming off is not treated as completed if there is no new printout showing that the line fell on the register.

A bank notice does not complete the registration

The bank may notify separately that it is holding the account. The notice does not stand in for the line on the vehicle register. The type of the block is separated under electronic attachment. If the notice does not write the tax office, an attachment of motor vehicle tax is not assumed. When there is no annotation on the register, the vehicle record is not declared attached by looking only at the bank notice. The plate appearing in the notice is not treated as having written the line on the registration printout.

The amount in the account movement is not read as the amount of the debt on the register. If the amount line is not in the notice, the balance is not completed from here. If there is more than one holding, the name of the institution of each notice is separate. A movement whose institution name is empty is not written to the tax office. An instalment of a vehicle credit, or a collection of insurance, is not the description of the annotation line. If the receipt does not show which office it went to and with which description, it does not close the annotation.

The tax writing and the enforcement file are separate envelopes

If a payment order of an enforcement office has arrived separately, that order is under when the payment order arrived. An objection in enforcement is not pasted onto the writing of the tax office. An objection to enforcement belongs only to the paper of the enforcement office. If there is no enforcement file number on the tax writing, a number is not invented. Even if the two envelopes went in the same week, the letterheads are not mixed.

The register printout, the tax writing and, if there is one, the bank notice stand side by side in the same file. If the institution on the printout does not match the office in the heading of the writing, the conflict is not treated as closed. The conflict is not treated as absent because the plate is the same. A photocopy of the licence does not stand in for these three documents if there is no annotation line. If there is a heading of an enforcement office as the basis, the statute is the text of Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004. A heading of the tax office is not added to this text as a payment order.

A second printout taken from the query does not pass into the place of the first by itself. The date lines of the two printouts should stand side by side. If there is no date, which one was taken later is not chosen. If there is a line on one printout and not on the other, the line is not treated as erased. The erasure is read if an open sentence that it fell stands on the new printout. If there is no sentence, it is not announced that the old annotation is still standing either. If the two printouts conflict, the vehicle is not closed, in a single word, as attached or as not attached, before the conflict closes. A query taken during a notarial sale is not put in the place of the registration record if it is not an annex of the sale contract. The query should carry the plate and the name of the institution. If it does not carry them, the sale is not treated as having lifted the annotation.

Conclusion

The tool of the reading is a register printout on which the name of the institution and the type of the debt are written. The front of the licence does not carry the annotation. A public record and an attachment of an enforcement office do not join, in the same sentence, as a general attachment of a vehicle. A bank notice does not complete the registration line. If the lines conflict, contact is for comparing the printout with the writing. The enforcement context stands on the enforcement and bankruptcy page.

Legislation

Frequently asked questions

If the register writes only the tax office, was the vehicle attached by the enforcement office?

No. If the institution is the tax office, the record is the annotation of the motor-vehicle-tax debt. A general attachment of a vehicle is not said when there is no enforcement-file number. The plate appearing restricted in the query does not make the name of the institution on the register line an enforcement office.

Is the annotation line a notice of sale?

It is not. A notice of sale is a separate paper. This article does not declare a sale prohibited when there is no restriction sentence on the register. The sale is not assumed to have started when there is no notice. The annotation standing does not mean the vehicle was put up for sale that day either.

Does a notice of the account change the vehicle record?

It does not. A bank notice and the registration line are separate documents. One is not treated as having written the other's annotation. If the tax office is not in the notice, the holding on the account is not named as motor vehicle tax.

If the licence is with another person and the debt is written in my name, for whom does the annotation run?

The name on the record and the debtor's name are compared. If the name of the licence holder is not on the annotation line, the attachment is not treated as entered on that vehicle. A tax writing written in your name does not pass by itself to the person on the licence. The two names should stand side by side.

If there is more than one line on the same vehicle, which one is motor vehicle tax?

The institution and the type of debt of each line are read separately. If the type is not written, it is not completed as motor vehicle tax. An enforcement-file line and a tax line are not joined. A traffic-fine line is not read in the place of this type either.

Related reading

This article sits under one practice area. The neighbouring guides carry the detail that does not belong in this text.

Practice areas · Enforcement & bankruptcy

Sources

AK

Author

Av. Ayşenur Konar

Lawyer on the Ankara Bar Association roll, founder of Konar Hukuk. This text is general information; a specific file is reviewed separately. Author profile · Editorial policy

A consultation

We can look at the matter with you. The path depends on the documents. This is not a promise about the result.

Call