In short
The start of interest on a judgment for non-pecuniary compensation is the interest sentence in the operative paragraph. If the sentence writes a starting word, the start is that word. If there is no sentence, the creditor does not add a start. A rate is not written if the paragraph does not write it. This note answers from which paragraph the interest line is read. The opening of enforcement with a judgment, the fork in the path, and the definition of non-pecuniary compensation are not built here.
The discussion in the reasoning does not change the paragraph. A paragraph that does not change does not carry another start into the request. A word that is carried is a line that is not in the judgment.
The starting word is in the paragraph
The creditor writes the operative paragraph into the enforcement request, not the reasoning paragraph. If the paragraph built the interest on the non-pecuniary compensation in a separate sentence, what is read is that sentence. If the sentence shows the kind of interest in a word, the kind is that word. A percentage is not added if the paragraph does not write it. If the paragraph wrote a rate, that writing is read. This note does not produce a rate. A percentage that is produced goes outside the judgment.
If the starting word shows a particular date, that date is the date the judgment shows. If the date is not on the file, the creditor does not choose a date. The date that is chosen stands in for the sentence. The sentence may have written the time of the event, the time the decision was given, or another word as the start. Whichever word was written, that word is read. The creditor does not choose, of the three, the one that does not stand in the paragraph. The debtor does not change the word written in the paragraph with another discussion in the reasoning either.
If the paragraph asked for the interest together with the principal price in a single result sentence, the request carries that joined sentence too. If the joined sentence wrote only the principal price without using the word interest at all, the interest part is treated as absent. The part that is treated as absent is not added to the end of the petition.
The reasoning paragraph does not change the operative paragraph
The reasoning is the section that tells why the court reached that result. The operative paragraph is the result that is put into enforcement. If interest was spoken of in the reasoning and an interest sentence was not built in the paragraph, the text put into enforcement is the paragraph. The creditor does not cut a sentence from the reasoning and write it into the petition of request as the start of interest. The debtor does not count a hesitation in the reasoning as a record that erases a sentence written clearly in the paragraph either.
If the reasoning and the paragraph do not use the same word, the conflict is read by the paragraph being the last word. If the reasoning tells a longer period and the paragraph chose a shorter word, the word that was chosen is the one in the paragraph. If the creditor carries the long account into the paragraph, they have asked for the period the judgment did not choose. The period that is carried is not confirmed from this note.
If the decision was corrected, or the reasoned decision was written later, the interest sentence that is read is in the paragraph of the last text put into enforcement. The sentence in the earlier short decision does not run on its own if the last text does not keep it. If the last text did not build the paragraph at all, the earlier draft is not presented as an interest sentence.
The word of the pecuniary item is not borrowed
On the same judgment, the interest on pecuniary compensation can start from another word. The non-pecuniary line does not take the date of the pecuniary line. If the two items were joined in a single interest sentence, the joined sentence of the judgment is read. Two sentences that are not joined are not pulled to a single start in the petition. The word that is pulled invents interest for the item that stayed silent.
If the pecuniary item writes one date and the non-pecuniary item writes another date, each request carries the word of its own sentence. The creditor does not see the two dates side by side and apply the earlier one to the non-pecuniary line as well. The debtor cannot spread the later one to both lines either. Spreading erases the sentence the paragraph separated.
What non-pecuniary compensation is sits on the pecuniary and non-pecuniary compensation page. The definition does not fill the starting word in the operative paragraph. The definition note tells which damage is counted as non-pecuniary. The account does not choose a kind of interest that is not written in the judgment. If there is more than one non-pecuniary item, each item's own sentence is looked for. If the paragraph gathered them all in a single sentence, the gathered sentence is read. If it did not gather them, the word of the first item does not pass to the second item.
An extra line is not put on a silent paragraph
If the word interest is not in the judgment, a start of interest is not put on the request for enforcement. A start that is put is a word that is not in the judgment. The creditor does not choose a kind from the text of a statute and fill the silence of the paragraph. This note does not choose a kind either. If the paragraph wrote only the principal price, what is asked for is that price. A line added beside the price is outside the judgment.
The interest record on an employment judgment is not the example of this line. That record sits on the enforcement of an employment claim page. The word the labour court used is not carried into the paragraph of non-pecuniary compensation. The word that is carried does not become the sentence of this judgment. In the same way, the interest sentence on the judgment of another civil court is not the paragraph of this file either. Each judgment is read with its own paragraph.
If the paragraph showed the kind of interest in a word and did not write the starting word at all, the missing piece is not completed. The kind stands as the kind. If the start is not in the paragraph, the request does not add a date beside that kind. A date that is added is not treated as having filled the place the sentence left silent.
The sentence in the minutes is not the court's paragraph
If there is an interest sentence in mediation minutes, the document is minutes, not a judgment. The minutes sit on the enforcement of mediation minutes page. The start in the minutes is not carried into the court's paragraph. If the judgment and the minutes stand side by side in the same dispute, the text put into enforcement is the paper the request for enforcement shows as the basis. If the request shows the judgment, the word in the minutes is not added to the judgment. If the request shows the minutes, the paragraph of the judgment is not written in place of the minutes.
How a file with a judgment is opened sits on the how enforcement with a judgment is started page. The separation of enforcement with a judgment and without a judgment sits on the difference between enforcement with and without a judgment page. This note does not tell the enforcement order or the competent office. While the interest sentence is looked for in the paragraph, it is written from the contact record. The record does not complete a rate that is not in the paragraph, or a start that is not there.
If the paragraph wrote more than one defendant as jointly liable, the request carries that sentence of joint liability. If the sentence showed only one defendant as liable, the other is not added to this line. The defendant who is added is the person the judgment left silent. If the word of joint liability is not in the paragraph, the creditor does not put this word beside the starting sentence. If a separate start was written for each defendant, each request carries its own word. One person's word does not pass to the other's line.
If the higher court changed the starting sentence in the first-instance paragraph, the sentence that is read is the last text. If the last text changed only the start of the pecuniary item, the non-pecuniary line stands in the state that was not changed. The creditor does not apply the word of the item that changed to the item that did not change either. If a reversal decision did not build a new paragraph, the text that was reversed is not presented as the last word put into enforcement. Which text is the last is separated from the date of the covers and from the name of the authority. If there is no date, the creditor does not choose the last text.
A partial payment the debtor made does not change the starting word. The slip must show whether it was counted against the principal price, or, if the paragraph wrote a separate line, against that line. If it does not show it, the slip is not treated as having erased the start. If the receipt and the judgment conflict, the conflict is not closed in favour of the receipt while the paragraph stands. Closing is read only if the judgment, or a later written document of the parties, writes that it closed that item.
The petition of request must carry the sentence in the paragraph in its own words. If the creditor leaves the kind-word of the sentence and writes another kind, the kind that was written is not in the judgment. When the debtor sees the extra word in the petition, they direct their answer to that word. An answer that does not direct it does not itself have discussed the start written in the paragraph. If the enforcement order does not carry the word in the request as it stands, the order and the paragraph are placed side by side. If the start the order added is not in the paragraph, the order is not treated as having built that start.
If there is more than one judgment for the same event, the non-pecuniary line of each judgment is read from its own paragraph. The starting word of the first judgment is not carried to the second if the second judgment did not refer to it. The reference is limited to the judgment the paragraph shows. The creditor does not join the two paragraphs in a single start. The debtor does not count the silence of the second judgment as a record that erases the word of the first judgment either. Erasure is read only if the last text writes that it removed the earlier sentence.
Conclusion
Interest on a judgment for non-pecuniary compensation starts from the line in the operative paragraph. If there is no line, a start and a rate are not added. The reasoning paragraph does not stand in for this line. The word of the pecuniary item is not written onto the non-pecuniary line. The frame stands on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The official basis is the provisions on the enforcement of judgments in the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.