In short
A transfer of a share in a limited company depends on the form the statute and the articles of association look for, and on the entry in the share ledger. If the form is missing, a claim of good faith does not, on its own, fill the ledger, and that the price has been paid does not close the gap either. The question of how the transfer is made is not answered by oral consent. The transfer of a share in a joint-stock company is in a separate text. That form is not copied here, because the transfer is not announced before the concrete contract, the minutes, and the share ledger stand side by side. A missing paper does not turn oral consent into form. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant decision does not close this gap either.
The form is read from the statute and from the articles
The form in which the transfer transaction will be made stands in the statute and in the articles of association. In practice the written text and entry in the share ledger are looked for together. The articles can also tie the transfer to the partners' approval, and the place of the approval is read from the articles. The form comes out of these two sources. A third convenience is not invented. A new partner is not announced by skipping the sentence of approval in the articles, because the form is not announced before the concrete contract, the written text, and the ledger stand side by side. A missing paper does not finish the transfer. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant minutes do not close this gap either.
Approval is not filled with oral consent
If approval is looked for, the decision should stand in the minutes of the general assembly or in the place the articles show. A sentence of oral consent does not stand in for the permission the articles wrote. Permission and the price are not the same thing. That money was paid does not write the minutes of approval. If there are no minutes, the consent of the partners' assembly is not assumed, because approval is not announced before the concrete decision, the articles, and the signature stand side by side. A missing paper does not turn the price into permission. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant document does not close this gap either.
The share ledger does not complete the form
The share ledger follows who appears as the owner of the share against the company, and writing it in the ledger does not keep the transfer standing if the form that is looked for is missing. Good faith is not counted as a signature put in place of an empty form. The meaning of the ledger entry is in the text of the share-ledger entry. Here the ledger carries the trace of the transfer against the company. It does not become the provision itself, because a new partner is not announced before the concrete share ledger, the articles, and the minutes stand side by side. A missing paper does not turn the line into a transfer. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant decision does not close this gap either.
Paying the price does not finish the transfer
That the price was paid to the other party does not itself complete the form, and a payment slip does not stand in for the written text of the transfer. An invoice or a bank description does not produce the permission the articles of association look for either. The reading of the commercial books as evidence is in the account of commercial books. That account does not fill the form of the transfer. If the set of documents is incomplete, a new owner of the share is not announced, because the price is not treated as having completed the form before the concrete payment slip, the invoice, and the articles stand side by side. A missing paper does not turn the payment into a transfer. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant minutes do not close this gap either.
A transfer in a joint-stock company stands apart
The general split between a joint-stock company and a limited company is in the text of the difference between a joint-stock company and a limited company, and the transfer of a share in a joint-stock company is in the text of a transfer of shares in a joint-stock company. The two forms do not write each other's petition. The Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 gives the frame. That the office is in Çankaya does not change the authority of the transfer. The points to watch at formation are in the account of formation of a limited company, and the general frame is on the commercial law page, because the authority is not announced before the concrete petition, the articles, and the register record stand side by side. A missing paper does not join the two types of company. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant decision does not close this gap either.
Conclusion
A transfer of a share in a limited company depends on the form that is looked for and on the share-ledger entry. The articles of association can add approval. The ledger does not, on its own, fill a missing form, and oral consent does not take the place of the minutes. A new partner is not announced before the articles, the minutes, and the ledger stand side by side. The register record is not treated as having itself completed a missing form either, because a result is not built before the concrete articles, the minutes, and the ledger stand side by side. A missing paper does not announce a new partner. A guess does not fill this gap, and the relevant document does not close this gap either.