In short
When a condominium easement is attached, an annotation of condominium ownership does not arise from this attachment on its own; the attachment is entered on the easement record. This line is not the condominium-ownership line. Attaching the easement does not create condominium ownership. If ownership is created later, whether the attachment annotation was transferred to the new record is read from the land-registry writing. If there is no transfer writing, the annotation is not completed as if it were present on the ownership line.
This note answers why the two title lines are not the same record. It does not answer the general state of an annotation of attachment over immovable property, an objection to valuation, or the order of a mortgage sale.
The two records are not the same line
A condominium easement is a right created for an independent unit before the building is completed, and it is tied to a land share. Condominium ownership is the ownership record created for the same independent unit after the building is completed. One is not melted into a single line as the old name of the other. Which column is filled is read on the title extract. If the easement column is filled and the ownership column is empty, it is not said that condominium ownership was attached.
A contract, or a construction-in-return-for-flats project, may write that ownership will be created later. That sentence does not turn the easement on the title into ownership from that day. A flat that is in fact lived in does not change the column name either. An occupancy permit, or a permit to use the building, is not itself the attachment annotation. The permit document does not, by itself, show that the creation was entered on the title. The permit date and the registration date are separate lines. The two are not taken as the same day.
The list of independent units shows which flat the easement is tied to. If there is no list, a flat name is not produced from the site management's writing. A management plan does not itself change the title owner. The owner is read from the name column on the easement page. If the name conflicts with a promise in the contractor's contract, the title is taken as the basis. A promise does not give rise to an ownership annotation without registration.
Which line the attachment is entered on
The enforcement writing should show, by block, parcel, and unit number, which independent unit's easement it targets. While the number is missing, it does not follow that the whole block was attached. The land share is the share the easement is tied to. The rate of the share does not carry the attachment to a neighbouring flat's easement. If the list and the writing conflict, the conflict is kept. The conflict is not treated, by silence, as having attached the whole site.
If the unit number has changed on the title, the old number and the new number are placed side by side. If there is no writing of the change, the attachment on the old number is not treated as having passed to the new number on its own. The writing should show which number was abandoned. If it does not, the number is not completed. If two blocks carry the same number, the block name is looked for as well. If there is no block name, the attachment is not treated as spread to every block inside the island.
The general state of an annotation of attachment over immovable property sits under attachment of immovable property. This note does not repeat how that annotation does not lock the home. Objection to the valuation report sits under valuation. The report does not make the easement line an ownership line. The expert reads the title character from the register. A character that is not on the register is not created by being added to the report. A photograph of the flat in the report does not change the column name.
Where the annotation looks once ownership is created
When condominium ownership is created, the land registry may transfer an attachment and a mortgage on the easement to the new record. Transfer does not make the two records the same line. If the attachment appears on the new page, that line is read separately. If it does not appear, the old easement attachment is not treated as having passed to ownership by silence. The person concerned asks, from the land-registry writing, whether the transfer was entered. A petition does not announce an unentered annotation as if it had been entered.
If the old easement page was closed and a new ownership page was opened, the closing annotation is read. If the closing does not write that it deleted the attachment, deletion is not assumed. If the attachment line on the new page is blank, the blank is not treated as filled by a photocopy of the old page. A photocopy is not a transfer writing. The transfer stands in the annotations column of the new page itself.
If a mortgage is on the easement, the attachment does not delete it. The mortgage route sits under turning a mortgage into money. This note does not write rank or the order of sale. The mortgage line and the attachment line can stand side by side. One is not the release of the other. If there is no release writing, the annotation is not treated as lifted. If the mortgage was transferred to the new ownership page and the attachment was not, the two rights are not treated as having shared the same fate. Each is read from its own line.
If the owner transfers an attached easement record, the annotation is not deleted by the transfer. Transfer sits under can attached immovable property be sold. This note does not retell that the buyer takes it together with the annotation. The buyer reads which line was transferred from the title extract. If there is no extract, the line is not assumed. If the transfer contract writes "condominium ownership" and the title still shows an easement, the contract does not change the column name.
Another independent unit does not enter this attachment
The easements of the other flats on the same parcel are not locked by an attachment that came onto the debtor's unit. Site management, or the contractor, is not the owner on the title. The owner's name is read from the list of independent units. If there is no list, a flat number is not invented. A unit belonging to the contractor and a unit belonging to the landowner may be written separately in the contract. The contract does not itself change the title owner. If the title and the contract conflict, the title is taken as the basis.
A common area is not the easement of an independent unit. An annotation that comes onto a common area is not treated as having attached the debtor's flat separately. An attachment that comes onto a flat is not treated as having put the common area up for sale either. If the common area has no title line, a line is not produced from the site plan as an enforcement annotation. The plan shows which unit is independent. If it does not, the number is not completed.
A claim of a dwelling suited to the person's condition sits under homestead protection. Whether the easement yet has the character of a dwelling is read from the title character and the actual situation. This note does not build the homestead petition. A family-home annotation is not the same line as an easement attachment either. That annotation sits under the family-home annotation. If there is no annotation, the character of a family home is not treated as having turned the attachment into condominium ownership. If there is an annotation, and the column name still stands as an easement, ownership is not treated as created.
A permit document does not stand in for registration
A permit to use the building, an occupancy permit, or a numbering writing is not the moment condominium ownership was created. These documents may show that the building can be used, or that an address was given. Registration is the land registry closing the easement page and opening the ownership page. If there is no opening writing, the attachment is not treated as entered there as if an ownership page existed.
The duration of the condominium easement, or its removal, may be written separately on the title. If the removal annotation does not write that it also deleted the attachment on it, the attachment is not treated as lifted. If removal and attachment appear on the same day, which was entered first is read from the sequence number. If there is no sequence number, the earlier right is not completed. This note does not write an order of priority.
If the sale notice announced the easement as condominium ownership, the notice has not corrected the title. If the character in the notice and the column on the title conflict, the conflict is kept. The auction is not turned, by silence about the conflict, into a sale of ownership. The buyer reads which right was sold once the title extract and the notice stand side by side. If there is no extract, the character is not built from the sentence of the notice.
A later change in the land-share rate does not carry the attachment to another independent unit. If the change was entered on the title, the entered line is read. A project or a management writing, without being entered, does not change the number of the attached unit. The new number is not treated as having taken over the old attachment on its own. A transfer exists if the land-registry writing shows which attachments passed to the new number. If the writing only changes the share rate and does not mention the attachment, the attachment has not been written onto the new unit. The owner of a neighbouring unit shows, with a title extract, that no annotation fell on their own easement. If there is no extract, the neighbouring unit is not treated as clear. A record that is not treated as clear does not delete the attachment on the debtor's unit either. A block or site name does not stand in for the unit number. If the name is not on the title extract, the attachment is not treated as spread to the whole site.
Conclusion
An easement attachment is not the same line as a condominium-ownership annotation. The attachment is entered on the easement shown by the unit number. When ownership is created, the transfer is read from the land-registry writing. If there is no writing, the annotation is not assumed on the new line. Another unit does not enter this attachment on its own. A permit document does not stand in for registration. The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The contact line is open for reading the two title pages together. The basis is the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.