In short
A complaint on a bounced cheque is not read as another name for enforcement, and the two doors are not joined by the bank's note. The money enters the cover account of the enforcement file, while the complaint goes to the judicial authority, and one file's papers are not the other's cashier. This note states no prison term, no fine, and no complaint day, and these measures are not chosen before the cheque is seen. Which version of the Cheque Law leaves the complaint open is not said before the cheque's date and the note line are seen, and the version in force is not chosen from memory either.
Enforcement is the file for the money
Seeking the cheque by the negotiable-instrument route sits in the account of enforcement of a cheque debt, and that text deliberately leaves the criminal complaint outside. If there has been no presentment at all, presentment is read first. A complaint does not itself turn an unpresented cheque into an enforcement file, and a number of days is not carried into this body either. The general frame of a negotiable-instrument proceeding is in the negotiable-instrument proceeding text. Not every cheque is the opening document of a bankruptcy action. If the bank copy of the cheque does not stand in the enforcement request, a measure of collection is not built. A copy without the note is not treated as having filled the cover account, and a judicial petition does not stand in for that account either.
The complaint goes to the judicial authority
A complaint carries the claim that the cheque bounced to the judicial authority, and it carries no promise of collection. The money does not come out of this door's cashier. The signature of a company officer and the drawer company may be different persons. Whom the application is made against is read from the signature and the business name on the face of the cheque. An unauthorised signature stands apart in the account of an unauthorised cheque. This body does not rewrite the elements of the offence, and it sets no measure of imprisonment. The bank copy of the cheque is attached to the complaint petition. While the copy is missing, a measure of result is not built, and collection in the enforcement file does not mean the complaint has fallen away.
The two doors do not end on the same note
The bank's note can be evidence for both doors, but the note is not treated as having both collected the money and ended the judicial examination. This note does not treat the enforcement file and the complaint petition on a bounced cheque as the same cover number. Each paper goes to its own authority. Service going out from the enforcement office does not do the work of the judicial authority, and a judicial writing does not close the enforcement cover account. An invoice or a current-account statement is not pasted in place of the note on the cheque, and the decision is read separately for each door. Collection is not treated as having dropped the complaint on its own.
The authority is not chosen from the office address
That the office is in Çankaya does not choose the competent authority on a bounced cheque. The district of the bank branch does not itself establish both the enforcement office and the judicial authority. Which door is open is not announced before the date of the particular cheque, the place of drawing, and the note line are seen. If the application papers have no copy of the cheque, the question whether complaint and enforcement are separated is not answered on an incomplete document. A prison term and a complaint day are not written into this body without looking at the version of the statute, which has changed over the years. A fine is not chosen before the cheque is seen either.
Two statutes carry the two doors
The basis is the Cheque Law No. 5941 and the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004. The first text carries the judicial frame on a cheque being unpaid, and the second carries seeking the money in an enforcement file. The two do not complete each other's petition. Which provision applies is not chosen before the date of the note is seen. The version in force is not announced detached from the cheque's date, and a measure of imprisonment does not come out as a figure from the names of these two statutes. A prison term and a complaint day do not enter this note as figures merely because the names of these two statutes are mentioned.
Conclusion
On a bounced cheque, enforcement and a complaint are two doors. The bank's note does not end both of them, and collection does not drop the complaint on its own. A prison term and a complaint day are not in this note. A fine is not chosen either, and the version in force is not announced before the cheque's date is seen. The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. If the cheque copy and the note are missing, which door is open is not said. An invoice does not take the place of the note, a current-account statement is not treated as having joined the two doors, and collection does not close the judicial door.