In short
In the description of a transfer to the enforcement account, the office name, the principal number, and the debtor's name as it is in the file are written. This line shows which debt the payment was tied to. If the line is incomplete, the money may stay uncertain. It is not said, with this description, that another person's debt closed. This text does not build that closing.
Which account the money will go to is under payment into the enforcement file. Even if the description is correct, the collection not appearing in the file is under I paid the debt. If a collection line opens, the name of the item that can arise is in the article the collection fee. The rate and the amount are not here. Only the description line is read here.
The file and the name on the line
The description is the line the cashier reads in order to tie the money to a principal number. The office name, the year and the sequence number, and the debtor's name as it appears in the file stand on this line. The creditor's name is a distinguisher when the debtor has more than one file. If the bank's character limit shortens the line, what is shortened is the unnecessary word, not the principal number. If the principal number and the office name are lost under the abbreviation, the match stays uncertain again.
The order may change according to the bank's field. Even if the order changes, if the three pieces of information do not stand, which debt was meant is not completed. A general sentence such as "debt payment" does not stand in for the principal number. A general sentence does not have the office make a choice. The words "enforcement debt", "attachment", or "payment order" do not produce a principal number either. A word may call to mind the kind of intention. The suggestion is not put in the place of the file number.
The number is taken from the record in the payment order, the service, or the office writing. A figure said on the telephone is not carried into the description without being compared with this record. If there is no comparison, the risk of a wrong match stays in the description. If the figure on the message screen and the figure in the payment order are separate, the figure in the order is taken as the basis. The figure on the screen is not treated as having corrected the order.
An incomplete description leaves the match uncertain
A transfer on which only the name and surname are written may not be tied to another file of the same name, or to any file. A transfer on which only the amount is written carries no intention at all. If the number is missing, the office may take the money to the first place it sees, or into a custody account. This possibility does not mean a particular file closed. The meaning is that the match stayed uncertain.
Money that stayed uncertain does not stand as a collection in the file the debtor wanted. An amount taken into custody does not fall into that file of itself when the description is completed later. The allocation appears by a new line opening in the office record. Without the line opening, the sentence "I passed the description on later" does not change the balance. The sentence that was passed is not pasted in the place of the empty description on the receipt.
A number written wrongly shows that number before the intention. A correction is not made by a later interpretation of the figure on the receipt. Which item it was entered to is the question of the cover. The item breakdown is in the article the cover account. This text does not write the item order or the amount. The effect of a partial deposit on the remaining balance is not built here either. Writing "remaining debt" in the description is not treated as having chosen the item order on the cover.
Another person's name does not build a closing
Writing another person's name and file number in the description does not show that that person's debt closed. The line only carries which debt the money was intended to be tied to. The office does not write a closing without matching it with its own record. Even if there is a match, the closing is not built from this line. Paying another person's debt is read separately from the collection line in the file. If there is no line, the closing is treated as absent.
A transfer that goes to one's own debt in a family member's name gives rise to the same uncertainty. If the person who appears as the debtor in the file and the person in the description are separate, the office may not be able to build the match from the description. Without the match being built, the attachment is not accepted as lifted. In a file where there is joint liability, which name will be written is read from the record that appears as the debtor in the proceeding. A name that is not in the record is not added. If the surety and the principal debtor are on separate lines in the same file, the description should show which line was meant. A line that does not show it is not treated as having closed both.
A person who wants to pay a third person's debt may write his own name in the description and skip the file number. The skipped number does not close the third person's file. The record that closes it is only the collection line of that file. This page does not build the results of a payment for the benefit of a third person. What is built is only this: if the name in the description does not overlap with the debtor's name in the file, the match stays uncertain.
The receipt does not change the description afterwards
The bank receipt is a copy of the description that went. A message sent after the transfer has gone out does not change the line on the receipt. The office reads the description that came together with the money that came. A later petition can recount the intention. The petition does not rewrite the bank record retrospectively. A new transfer is not treated as having completed the old movement without a description of itself.
The bank branch cannot erase the description, after the movement has passed, with the debtor's word either. A claim of erasure is not accepted if there is no new receipt the bank corrected. If there is a new receipt, the old line and the new line are read side by side. While one is absent, the other is not produced in its place. If the two receipts conflict, the office takes as the basis the description of the movement that reached its hand. A correction that is not in its hand is not treated as entered in the file.
Even if the description was written correctly, if the money went to the wrong account the line does not correct the account. The account and the line are read separately. The correctness of the account stands under payment into the file. This text does not produce an IBAN. A number that does not appear in the file is not added because the description is trusted. If the description is correct and the account is wrong, the money may not have entered the office cashier. Money that did not enter is not brought to the state of having entered by a description sentence.
The trade name and the character limit
The trade name that appears as the debtor in the file is written. The authorised person's own name does not stand in for the company's principal number. The trade name is read as it is in the file. If an abbreviation does not match the office record, the match stays uncertain. "Ltd", "A.Ş.", or the short name on the signboard may not be the whole of the trade name in the register. If the full trade name does not fit, at least the principal number and the office name should fit. If the principal number does not fit, the short name has not chosen the file.
The character limit is the length of the bank's field. The length is not for carrying the debtor's letter of intention. What will be carried is the office, the principal number, and the name in the file. If these three overflow the field, the unnecessary courtesy sentence is taken out first. If the principal number is taken out, the match stays uncertain. A transfer that stayed uncertain is not treated as written to the correct file because the field filled up.
If more than one file is squeezed into the same description, the office may not be able to separate which debt was meant. Money it could not separate does not close both files. A separate movement for each file is not written as an order on this page. What is written is that a single description will not be treated as having allocated two principal numbers at the same time. If two principal numbers are to be allocated, each is looked for as a separate line in the office record.
A custody line does not choose the description afterwards
Money whose description stayed incomplete may stand at the office as custody. Custody does not mean a file closed. Tying the amount in custody to a principal number later requires a new office record. Without the record opening, a second message the debtor sent does not drop the custody into the file he wanted.
When the tying record is opened, the principal number that is read is the principal number in the record. The empty description on the first receipt is not written in the place of this principal number. If the two papers conflict, the office record is read. If there is no record, the gap on the receipt has not chosen a file in the debtor's favour. The attachment of a file that was not chosen is not treated as lifted because the custody is standing.
In a proceeding that has more than one debtor, the description should also show which debtor's share was meant. A line that does not show it is not treated as having closed all the debtors at once. The share is read from the debtor column in the file. A share that is not in the column is not added because the description is trusted.
If the description line carries the creditor's abbreviated name, the office name and the principal number should still stand. An abbreviated creditor does not stand in for the principal number. If the principal number does not stand, the custody is not written of itself to that creditor's file. The closing of a file that was not written is not built from the short name in the description.
Conclusion
The transfer description shows, with the office name, the principal number, and the name in the file, which debt was meant. An incomplete line leaves the match uncertain. It is not said from this line that another person's debt closed. The receipt does not change the description afterwards. If the character limit swallows the principal number, the match stays uncertain again. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The collection entered in the file is read under the provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law numbered 2004. If the description and the receipt are in hand, they can be looked at separately through the contact route.