In short
A sentenced person's right to meet a lawyer is the legal-help meeting during the serving of the sentence, and the conviction does not of itself erase this meeting. The aim is that a legal matter be discussed, such as an objection to the serving of the sentence or preparation for conditional release. Entry is not treated as made before the power of attorney and the identity document the institution looks for are complete. There is no length of meeting in this text.
A person in pretrial detention is under a measure before the judgment has become final. The sentenced-person record is read from the institution's document of the person. The rule of a family visit is not built so that it passes of itself into this meeting. The decision and the petition stand without joining the two doors in the same sentence. Which status is being discussed is not said before the document is seen. The minutes are requested separately.
The sentence record is not a copy of pretrial detention
The meeting with a person in pretrial detention sits under a meeting in pretrial detention. What is recounted there is the meeting of a person under a measure with defence counsel. A sentenced person is in the sentence regime. The two records are not pasted onto the same petition. The status is read from the institution's document of the person. A record kept before the judgment becomes final does not stand in for the sentence document. The decision shows which stage was written.
The general lawyer meeting in a penal institution sits under a lawyer in prison. That heading does not finish the status in a single sentence. The sentenced-person record is not buried of itself inside that general account. The result is not stated before the document of the person and the petition stand side by side. The length of the meeting is not written in this separation either. A minute or an hour is not added to this text.
The power of attorney and the document the institution looks for
The institution asks for a power of attorney and an identity document. If the document is missing, that entry may not be made. The gap does not mean legal help has fallen away. A new entry is the completion of the missing page. If the decision has not yet been served, the meeting is not put in the place of service. The petition shows for which matter the meeting is requested. If minutes were kept, the subject that was discussed, or left unspoken, is read from that line. A subject that was not written is not added to the petition.
The application proceeds in the order the institution asked for. The order is not copied from another institution's paper. The power of attorney does not stand in for the visitors' list. The list does not stand in for the power of attorney either. The two papers are kept separately. A conclusion that entry was made is not built before the identity document and the power of attorney stand side by side. The length of the meeting is not written onto this missing paper either.
A claim of confidentiality and the restriction writing
The confidentiality of the meeting sits under confidentiality in the meeting. A claim that it was listened to is read separately from the meeting itself. An officer standing at the door does not mean the content of the conversation was written down. If the content was written, those minutes are requested separately. Content that was not written is not added to the petition. A claim of restriction is read from the document the institution wrote.
The general frame of prohibitions sits under prohibitions on a prison visit. That frame does not paste the same prohibition onto every sentenced person. If a discipline note became the subject of the meeting, the note itself is looked for. It is not said that it was cut off while there is no note. The decision shows the date and the ground of the note. If the ground was not written, a result is not invented. The length of the meeting is not written as the length of the prohibition either.
The schedule does not carry the length into this text
The institution's schedule sits under the working-hours schedule. The schedule does not carry into this text how many minutes the meeting will last. The length is read from the record of the institution where the meeting took place. There is no length here. An article number is not added either. The line on the schedule does not stand in for the request in the petition.
The paper that comes out of the meeting may not have been given to the person. A paper that was not given does not mean the meeting did not happen. The petition makes do with the entry document in hand and the power of attorney. The decision is not made while the record the institution kept is absent. A member of the family waiting at the same time does not make this meeting a family visit. The two doors are two documents. Service shows separately which of them was notified.
What is separated in a sentenced person's meeting
A meeting of a sentenced person and a lawyer is the legal-help record during the serving of the sentence, and it is read apart from a meeting in pretrial detention. The office being in Çankaya does not change the authority of the institution where the sentenced person is held; this is read from the document. The length of the meeting is not written. A family visit is not put in the place of this meeting.
Conclusion
A meeting of a sentenced person and a lawyer is the legal-help meeting at the stage of serving the sentence, and the conviction does not erase this meeting. The length of the meeting is not written. The result is not stated before the power of attorney, the identity document, and the institution's record are there. The pretrial-detention record is not pasted onto this petition. The frame sits on the criminal law page. The basis is the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.