In short
The working hours of a meeting with counsel are read from the working frame the institution has announced. Not every prison applies the same schedule. This text does not write an hour, a minute or the length of the meeting. The question of by what the hours of a meeting with counsel are read is answered from there if the institution's document stands.
Capacity, security and the staff plan change the schedule. A public holiday and the duty rota can also have an effect. A holiday is not written as a copy of the weekday schedule. If there is no notice, there is no hour either. An oral sentence that "it is open every day" does not take the place of the notice.
The schedule is in the institution's notice
The meeting hour is not a single national table. The institution announces its own operation. The notice may stand on the board, in a writing or in a document given to counsel. Which document will be taken as the basis is read from the paper in hand. If there is no paper, the hour is not completed. One institution's notice does not announce another institution's hour. If there is a transfer, the new institution's schedule is looked for. The old institution's hour is not carried of itself to the new place.
A person in pre-trial detention and a convicted person may not be in the same ward. The meeting order of the two statuses is not dissolved in the same sentence either. Which status is written is read from the decision and the institution's record. If there is no record, the status is not invented. The request for a meeting is read from the unit to which the request was given. If the unit conflicts with the place on the service, both are stated and one is not erased. The conflict is not closed by adding an hour.
A family visit is not the same list
It is not said that a family visit is another name for a meeting with counsel. The visitors' list does not take the place of the defence-counsel record. An open visit and a closed visit are the family visit's own distinction. That distinction is not pasted onto counsel's working schedule. Counsel's document check runs apart from the visitor's identity check. The two doors are two documents. One does not determine the other's hour.
Confidentiality concerns the content of the meeting. The hour does not carry the rules of the content. How the content is protected is read separately. This text writes neither the subject of the conversation nor its length. If minutes were kept, and if the minutes show the hour, that hour is the hour the institution wrote. If they do not show it, an hour is not added. A signature does not of itself change the schedule.
Confirmation before the meeting is read from the paper
Confirmation with the institution before the meeting is looking at the notice in hand. Confirmation is not inventing a new hour. The document asked for at the entrance is on the institution's list. If there is no list, a list of documents is not completed from here. Being late can affect the queue. The measure of that is in the institution's practice. A number of minutes is not written. Whether there is duty on a public holiday is also read from the notice. If the notice is silent, the holiday is not counted as open.
An urgent case outside working hours is not a rule that brings every request inside working hours. What is called urgent is read from there if it stands in the institution's writing and in the concrete event. If there is no writing, an urgent hour is not produced. The practice of an institution in another province is not carried here as an example. Each file looks at its own institution's document.
If the institution's notice counts certain days of the week, those days are in the notice. If it does not count them, a list of days is not written from here. The order of meetings can change with that day's density. The measure of the density is not frozen as a period. Papers counsel brings are limited to the documents the institution asked for. A list of papers that were not asked for is not invented. If a convicted person has been transferred to another institution, the transfer document shows the name of the new institution. The old institution's schedule is not read as still running after the transfer. The new institution's notice is looked for. If there is no notice, there is no hour either. If the transfer document and the minutes conflict, both remain.
The Çankaya address does not choose the institution
An Ankara lawyer does not write the Çankaya address of the office in the place of the prison. The competent authority is the place the judgment and the institution's record show. An hour is not added so that the schedule will pass of its own accord. The district of the office does not change the institution where the meeting will be held. The name of the district does not take the place of the hour in the notice.
How the hour is read from the file
An hour and a length of meeting that are not written in the institution's notice are not added. A family-visit list is not read as counsel's schedule.
Conclusion
The answer to by what the hours of a meeting with counsel are read is the institution's notice. An hour and a period are not written. A meeting in prison sits under a meeting at the institution, a meeting with a convicted person under a meeting with a convicted person, a meeting with a person in pre-trial detention under a meeting with a detained person, and confidentiality under confidentiality of the meeting. The framework is on the criminal law page. The basis is the text of Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.