In short
If a medication accusation is written against the nurse, the physician's order and the application hour in the nurse's record are read as separate lines. Article 4 of the Nursing Law numbered 6283 speaks of the nurse applying the treatment given in writing by the physician, except in emergencies. The written request is one line. The hour at which the application was entered is another line. The patient's medication complaint is in the record a medication error. This text does not copy that guide. There is no technique of application and no dose table.
This article answers how the two lines are separated in the accusation written against the nurse. It does not answer the authority the patient will apply to, or the head of harm. The construction of the fault sentence in the report, with the patient's objection, is also in the record an expert report. The report is not treated as absent on this page.
The order line
The order is the request the physician wrote. What is read is the name under which the medication was written on the paper, the route if there is one, and the hour of the request. If the name conflicts with the writing on the box, the conflict stands separately. This conflict does not recount how the medication will be prepared. The manner of preparation and of giving is not in this article.
If there is no physician's signature on the request, the absence is left. Another physician being on the same ward does not complete the signature. An emergency is the exception the statute mentions in the rule of a written request. The exception is not built later if it does not stand as a sentence in the file. Which clinical picture will be counted as an emergency is not described in this text. A picture that is not described does not recount how the medication will be given either.
If the name of the medication is written on the order, the name is read as the word on the paper. How the word will be prepared, by which route, and at which speed it will be given, is not on this page. If a route name is written on the paper, that also stands as a word. The word is not turned into an application lesson. A word that is not turned does not mean the line was erased either. If the line stands, the name is read.
If two physicians wrote an order on the same day, each order stays at its own hour and with its own signature. One is not treated as having corrected the other's request. If a correction line is in the file, the line is read. If there is no line, the later order is not treated as having erased the earlier one. Whichever order the accusation shows, that order is looked for. An order that is not shown is not treated as absent. Both stand.
The application hour
The Regulation on the Operation of Inpatient Treatment Institutions says that, in an institution within its own scope, the nurse who applies the medication written on the chart enters the result of the application in the nurse's book. The hour in the book is the application record. The hour on the chart is the hour of the request. Even if the two hours do not show the same minute, the two are not reduced to a single line.
If the result box is empty, the word "I applied it" does not stand in for the line of the book. If the line is full, the full line may conflict with the hour in the complaint. The conflict is read from the hours. The conflict does not open a lesson about the correctness of the technique. In an institution that is not within the scope of the regulation, the article is not treated as applied of itself. The name of the ward is taken from the heading of the book.
If the same medication was entered twice, the hour of each line stands separately. The second line is not assumed to be the corrected state of the first. If a correction line is in the file, the hour of the line is also read. If there is no line, it is not treated as drawn later. This text does not show the route of erasing the line, or of writing an hour backwards.
If the application record carries another nurse's name, the accusation is looked at on that name's line. The morning note of the nurse who took over the duty does not stand in for the application hour of the night. The handover note is the later record. The night signature stands at its own hour. If two names were written together on the same line, the line is not split and one left outside. The split is made if there is already a separate line in the file.
If a page of the book is missing, the missing page is not produced from the hour on the chart. A page that is not produced does not have the chart treated as absent either. If the chart stands, the request is read. If the book stands, the application hour is read. If one is not there, the absence is not filled with the other's sentence. An absence that is not filled is not turned into a judgment of "she did not apply it" or "she applied it" either. There is no judgment in this text.
The signatures standing apart
The physician's signature is on the request. The nurse's signature is on the application record. If the accusation shows the nurse, the name on the application line is looked for. The physician's name on the order does not erase the nurse's signature. The nurse's signature does not bring the order to the state of never having been written either. The same regulation writes that the treatment of the inpatient is provided by the relevant health personnel on the physician's arrangement, and that the care is done by the nurses. The two duties do not load one person's act onto the other automatically, and they do not leave one outside automatically.
Against whom an action will be filed is in the record a malpractice action. Whether the act is a medical practice is in the record medical malpractice. The accusation written against the nurse is not the party line of the petition in the action. Which authority the patient's complaint goes to is in the record a complaint process against a doctor. That record does not carry the nurse's reading of the order.
The office's address does not choose at which hospital the order was opened. The hospital is read from the heading of the chart and of the nurse's book. If the heading says a private hospital or a public hospital, the institution is read from that heading. The heading does not change the place of the signatures. The physician's signature stays on the request, and the nurse's signature stays on the application record. A claim about the institution's organisation does not reduce these two signatures to a single line.
If the accusation shows the nurse and the physician's name on the order also appears in the report, the two names are kept separate. The separation that is kept does not leave the nurse, or the physician, outside in advance. Not leaving them outside is not announcing both as the perpetrator of the same act either. The announcement stays after the lines in the file are read, and outside this page. This page shows that the two signatures do not erase each other.
It is not a copy of the patient's complaint
The patient reads, in his own record, where he will apply after the medication. The nurse puts the two hours side by side in the accusation written against her. The authority of the application, the head of harm, and the plan of the complaint petition are not carried into this text. A plan that is not carried does not erase the order in front of the nurse either.
If the accusation says "the wrong medication", the name on the chart and the name in the book are read. If the accusation says "the wrong hour", the two hours are read. If the accusation is about technique, the technique is not recounted in this article. A technique that is not recounted does not mean the signature line is treated as absent either. If the signature stands, the signature stands.
The word on the chart
The medication name written on the chart and the name written in the nurse's book are put side by side as two words. If the words are the same, it is seen that they are the same. If they are different, the difference is left. The difference does not say how the medication will be prepared, or which dose is correct. There is no dose table in this text. The absence of the table does not mean the words will not be read either. What is read is the writing on the paper.
If a box, a label, or a pharmacy printout stands in the annex, the name on that paper is a third word. The third word is not put in the place of the order or of the book. If the three conflict, all three stand. The conflict is not turned into an application recipe on this page. There is no recipe that is turned. The nurse separates, in the accusation written against her, which word stands on which paper. The separation is not a method of erasing the line.
If the expert report mentions the nurse's name, the name that is mentioned is put side by side with the signature in the book. If there is a name in the report and there is no signature in the book, the absence is not filled from the report. If there is a signature in the book and another name is written in the report, both names stand. The report is not treated as absent for this reason. The patient's objection petition is not copied in the nurse's place either. A petition that is not copied does not erase the order line. The order stands. The application hour stands.
The duty-handover book and the nurse's intervention record are separate pages as well. The handover book may carry the summary left to the next nurse. The intervention record carries the application hour. The summary is not put in the place of the hour. The hour does not erase the summary. If the accusation shows a sentence in the summary and does not mention the intervention line, the line that is not mentioned is not treated as absent. Both are read. The reading does not pass to how the medication will be prepared, or how it will be given. This manner is not in the article. A manner that is not written does not mean the name on the paper will not be read either.
If the medication name was written as an abbreviation on the paper, and written as the open name on the other paper, the two writings stand side by side. Standing side by side does not judge on this page which writing is correct. Where a judgment is not built, the two writings are not erased either. A writing that is not erased is not turned into a dose table either. There is no table. The nurse's question is which word and which hour the accusation shows. The word and the hour stay as they stand in the file.
Conclusion
A medication accusation against the nurse is read from the order line and from the application hour. The patient's complaint guide and the technique of application are not in this text. The two signatures do not erase each other. The frame is on the health law page. Which hour is in which book can be asked with the record through contact.
The basis is on article 4 of the Nursing Law and, for the institutions within its scope, on articles 71 and 73 of the Regulation on the Operation of Inpatient Treatment Institutions.