In short
If the physician's criminal file and compensation file are separate, the paper enters according to the principal number on it. The two numbers are not mixed. A paper submitted to one file is not treated as having entered the other file of itself. The general separation of the criminal route and compensation is not recounted again in this text.
Two numbers are two covers
On the criminal side there is an investigation number or a court principal number. On the compensation side there is the principal number of the civil or administrative court. Whichever number the covering writing carries, the paper goes to that cover. If the number is faint, it is not guessed. A guess is not counted as entry to the wrong cover. A faint figure is not completed with a clear figure on another service. If two services stand side by side, each keeps its own number.
The physician looks at which prosecution office, or which court, the service in his hand came from. The heading writes the name of the institution. If there is no name, the number on its own is not completed as the number of the other file. The same sequence of figures may have passed in two institutions at once. The sequence being the same does not join the two covers. The year column and the sequence column are read as they are split on the paper. If there is no split, this text does not impose a form.
Why the two routes stand separately is in the article criminal proceedings and compensation. This page does not build that separation from the start. What it builds is which number the paper stayed in. There is no amount and no period in this text. Which file was opened earlier does not choose the cover the paper will go to either. What chooses is the number on the covering writing. If the order of opening does not stand on the paper, an order is not invented.
The submission's own record
An epicrisis given to the prosecution office does not pass of itself to the file of the compensation court. A report annexed to the compensation petition is not written of itself onto the evidence list of the criminal file. The same photocopy can be given to both places. The place it was given is read from the custody or sequence record. If there is no record, the word "I gave it" is not counted as entry. An envelope left by hand is different from a covering writing that carries a transfer date. If there is no number on the envelope, the envelope does not stand in for the numbered covering writing. If there is a cargo or post receipt, the recipient's name on the receipt is read. If the recipient is not the authority of the file, the receipt is not counted as entry to that file.
Each submission carries its own date. If there is no date, the date is not copied from the submission day of the other file. This article does not add a day in between. Which pages were counted in the annex of the submission is read from the index slip of the covering writing. If there is no slip, the word "I gave the whole file" does not write a page count. If the report named on the slip and the copy that remained in hand are different, the difference is not closed. A missing page is not counted as having been given in full.
An expert report taken in the criminal file does not pass to the compensation file of itself. Whichever principal number is written on the report, the report is on that cover. If a copy was taken out and submitted to the other number, the record of the submission is looked for separately. If there is an annotation "true to the original" on the copy, the annotation is read. The annotation does not, on its own, write that the report entered both files. A photocopy without an annotation does not change the cover where the original stands either. Which folder the original stayed in is read from the index of that folder. If there is no index, the original is not assumed to be in the place where the photocopy in hand is found.
Later changing a line in the record, or doing away with a document, is not the subject of this article. What is recounted is that each submission carries its own number. The physician does not draw from this page a route for doing away with a copy he thinks went to the wrong cover.
A covering writing that fell to the wrong number
A covering writing that fell to the wrong number is not treated as standing in the other file before it is submitted separately to the correct number. The copy on the wrong cover is not done away with. The copy standing on the wrong cover does not mean the correct cover has seen that paper. Entry to the correct cover is looked for in that cover's own custody record. If there is no custody record, there is no entry. If the institution's internal correspondence tied the two numbers to each other, the sentence that tied them is read. If there is no sentence, the internal correspondence is not treated as having carried the paper to the other file.
If there is a covering writing that was returned, the return annotation is read. The annotation does not mean the paper was never submitted, and it does not mean it went to the correct number of itself either. The return stands as a return. A new submission requires a new record. The old annotation does not stand in for the new record.
If the return annotation says "wrong authority", the authority that is said is read. If the name of the correct authority is not in the annotation, the name is not added from this text. A name that is not added has not carried the paper to the other file. The physician puts the authority in the annotation and the number on the covering writing side by side. If the two do not agree, the disagreement is not closed. The disagreement does not mean the paper stands nowhere either. The place it stands is the place the annotation and the custody record show. A place that is not shown is left blank.
Against whom the action is filed is in the article against whom it is filed. Paper that fell to the wrong number does not change the list of defendants. Paper that entered the correct number does not, on its own, erase the name on the list either. The list is on the cover of that file.
The same report on two covers
If the same report stands on both covers at once, both questions may be standing as well. Why the questions are separate is the subject of the separation article. What is read here is which number the report entered. The stamp on one copy of the report does not fill the gap on the other copy. An expression "it is annexed" on one cover does not mean it is annexed on the other cover as well. If the page counts on the two covers are different, the difference is read. The difference is not written in this text as a result in one side's favour.
The frame of a medical practice error is under medical malpractice. That frame does not say which principal number the report will enter. The patient's complaint authority is in the article a complaint process against a doctor. The authority the complaint petition went to does not change the criminal or compensation number in the physician's hand. If the petition is registered to a number, that number is read. The physician's own submission does not stick of itself to the number of the petition. The sticking exists if that number is written on the covering writing.
A covering writing that was mixed
If a compensation principal number was written beside the criminal principal number on the covering writing, the two lines are read separately. If two results at once were asked in a single petition, the results that were asked are still separate. Having been asked does not create a single file. The physician separates, from the heading of the service, which result stayed in which number. If only one is in the heading, the other is not assumed to exist. A number that is assumed has not carried the paper to the other cover.
If the subject of the covering writing is "for information", this expression does not mean the paper is the evidence of that file. Entry onto the evidence list is read from the list's own line. If there is no list, the information writing is not completed as evidence. If it is not written that a copy of the information writing was also put in the other file, it is not assumed that it was put. The initial on the transfer annotation does not mean the number changed. If there is no new number beside the initial, the old number stands.
If there are two covering writings that went out to two authorities on the same day, each writing carries its own annex list. Even if the lists carry the name of the same report, the two submissions are separate. If one counts a missing page, the gap is not closed from the full count of the other. The physician reads the two slips one under the other. The reading does not change the medical result of the report. The result is in the report's own sentence, and this page does not rewrite that sentence. What is written is the page name on the slip.
If the transfer under the covering writing writes which registry the paper went to, that registry is read. If the registry name does not change the principal number, the number stands. If the registry does not write as if it had turned the number into another file, a turning is not assumed. The physician reads the registry in the transfer and the number of the cover together. If the two are separate institutions, they stay as separate institutions. If two registries of the same institution also gave rise to two records, both records stand. One does not erase the other's custody record.
If there is more than one authority on the distribution list, each authority is read on its own line. If the prosecution office is on the list and the civil court is not, entry to the civil court is treated as absent. The reverse of the list holds as well. The list does not stand in for the service piece either. Whichever authority the piece went out to, that authority is read.
Conclusion
The paper enters the principal number on it. The two numbers are not mixed. One submission does not pass to the other file of itself. The copy on the wrong cover is not the record of the correct cover. The general frame of the separation is in the article criminal proceedings and compensation. The frame is on the health law page. If the two covers stand, the assessment is made on those numbers through contact. The basis of the criminal paper is the text of the Criminal Procedure Code numbered 5271.