In short
Preservation of evidence in an intellectual-property right is having a product, a page, or a process that one fears will be lost recorded through the court. That record is not a judgment that infringement has been established. Compensation, and a stop on sales, are not the automatic result of the preservation. The day of preservation is not tied to a figure in this text. If the product disperses, or the page is deleted, a later action may be unable to show the state of things at that moment.
The minutes write what was seen on that date. They do not finish the other side's fault, or the amount of the loss. Not every suspicion produces an order for preservation. Risk is not assumed without a concrete product or page. The right holder separates which right is in issue, and why the evidence carries a risk of dispersing.
A sample seen during an inspection is not treated as having been taken off the shelf until it is tied to the minutes. A photograph of a withdrawn product does not stand in for the sentence in the minutes. The sentence writes what was seen, and where. If the place is not written, the product is not widened as if it were in every warehouse.
What the minutes establish
A sample, a label, a machine, a warehouse, a web page, and a marketplace listing can be the subject of preservation. The general route for a trademark sits in the trademark infringement record. A comparison of appearance sits in design infringement, and a technical claim sits in the patent infringement record. This record does not rebuild those tests. The minutes are not the result of the test.
The trademark register may show the document of the right. The register does not stand in for the inspection minutes. The right on the register and the product on the shelf are read apart. While there is no product, the register does not of itself have infringement treated as established. The petition separates which document is the register and which document is the minutes. The separation is made when the two papers are placed side by side.
A screenshot is not an inspection
A screenshot the right holder took shows one moment of the listing. Preservation by the court is an inspection, or an expert's minutes. The two do not carry the same weight in every file. The image is not put in place of the minutes. If there are no minutes, a sentence of "I saw it" is not written as inspection minutes. The application separates which record was taken by the court.
A marketplace listing may also come down in its own channel. That coming down sits in the imitation listing on a marketplace record. A listing that has come down does not erase the minutes of a preservation already made. If there are no minutes, a page that has come down is not read as if it had never existed. The image in hand is an indication. An indication is not the judgment itself.
Compensation does not end with these minutes
Preservation keeps the evidence. How the loss will be discussed is a matter for the examination on the merits. This text does not write a sum. An order for preservation does not of itself give rise to compensation. Stopping the sales is also a separate request. The request is not of itself added to the last line of the minutes. The decision does not finish preservation and a stop in the same sentence.
When the right holder says which right has been infringed, they show the product, the page, or the process. If what is shown does not carry a risk of dispersing, preservation is not opened on a general suspicion. The risk is read from a concrete document. Risk is not assumed when there is no document. The petition does not name a suspicion as minutes.
The day of preservation is not in this text
When the preservation will be completed is read from the file's own course. This text does not write a day of preservation, and it does not tie it to a figure. A day is not invented. The date on the minutes is not an announcement of the day the step ended. The date fixes what was seen. The later action on the merits speaks of the state of things on that date. The date does not of itself turn into a finding of infringement.
A lawyer in Ankara separates, from the minutes, the fact that the office being in Çankaya does not change the competent authority. The office in Çankaya does not choose the place where the preservation will be made, or the court of the action on the merits. The name of the district does not stand in for the place where the product is, or for the register. The competent authority is read from the dispute's own rule. The office address does not produce a day of preservation.
How preservation is read from the document
Preservation of evidence in an intellectual-property right is read from the minutes of a product, page, or process that may disperse. Those minutes are not treated as a finding of infringement, or as compensation arising of itself. The day of preservation is not fixed in this text, and a screenshot does not stand in for inspection minutes.
Conclusion
Preservation of evidence records a state of things that may disperse. It is not a finding of infringement, and it is not a decision on compensation. The day of preservation is not written. The frame sits on the intellectual property page. The basis is the Code of Civil Procedure and the Industrial Property Code.